Endobronchial donor pre-treatment with ventavis: is a second administration during reperfusion beneficial to optimize post-ischemic function of non-heart beating donor lungs?

BACKGROUND: Lung retrieval from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) has been introduced into clinical practice successfully. However, because of potentially deleterious effects of warm ischemia on microvascular integrity, use of NHBD lungs is limited by short tolerable time periods before preservation. Recently, improvement of NHBD graft function was demonstrated by donor pre-treatment using aerosolized Ventavis (Schering Inc., Berlin, Germany). Currently, there is no information whether additional application of this approach in reperfusion can further optimize immediate graft function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Asystolic pigs (n = 5/group) were ventilated for 180-min of warm ischemia (groups 1-3). In groups 2 and 3, 100 microg Ventavis were aerosolized over 30-min using an ultrasonic nebulizer (Optineb). Lungs were then retrogradely preserved with Perfadex and stored for 3-h. After left lung transplantation and contralateral lung exclusion, grafts were reperfused for 6-h. Only in group 3, another dose of 100 microg Ventavis was aerosolized during the first 30-min of reperfusion. Hemodynamics, pO2/FiO2 and dynamic compliance were monitored continuously and compared to controls. Intraalveolar edema was quantified stereologically, and extravascular-lung-water-index (EVLWI) was measured. Statistics comprised ANOVA analysis with repeated measurements. RESULTS: Dynamic compliance was significantly lower in both Ventavis groups, but additional administration did not result in further improvement. Oxygenation, pulmonary hemodynamics, EVLWI and intraalveolar edema formation were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar deposition of Ventavis in NHBD lungs before preservation significantly improves dynamic lung compliance and represents an important strategy for improvement of preservation quality and expansion of warm ischemic intervals. However, additional application of this method in early reperfusion is of no benefit.

Uptake of bone-related matrix proteins into implanted deproteinized bovine bone mineral

Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (Bio-Oss®, Geistlich-Pharma, Wohlhusen, Switzerland) is widely used as a bone substitute for the preservation or augmentation of bone volume. After implantation near native bone, new bone may form around the DBBM particles. Since DBBM is very resistant to resorption, it will hardly ever be replaced by bone and, therefore, the mechanical stability largely depends on the extent of bridging between the newly formed bone and the DBBM particles. The molecular factors responsible for the deposition of new bone to the DBBM particles have not been determined. The aim of this study was, therefore, to test the hypothesis that DBBM implanted near bone take up bone-related matrix proteins that are involved in cell-matrix interactions. Cylindrical biopsies harvested from tooth extraction sites filled with DBBM particles were fixed in aldehydes, decalcified, and embedded in LR White resin. Thin sections were incubated with antibodies against bone sialoprotein (BSP) and osteopontin (OPN), two bone proteins involved in cell attachment, signaling, and mineralization. High-resolution immunogold labeling was used to examine protein distribution. BSP and OPN were immunodetected in all DBBM particles and yielded an identical distribution pattern. Most gold particles were found over the peripheral DBBM matrix, although some peripheral regions lacked immunolabeling. The bulk of the interior DBBM portion was mainly free of labeling with the exception of the peripheral matrix of some osteocyte lacunae and canaliculi. It is concluded that DBBM selectively takes up at least BSP and OPN after its implantation at a bone site. BSP and OPN or other molecules accommodating in DBBM may modulate events associated with cell attachment and differentiation.

Diethylhexylphthalate extracted by typical newborn lipid emulsions from polyvinylchloride infusion systems causes significant changes in histology of rabbit

Background: Looking for a candidate substance inducing hepatobiliary dysfunction under parenteral nutrition (PN) in newborns, we recently discovered that newborn infusions extract large amounts of the plasticizer diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP) from commonly used polyvinylchloride (PVC) infusion lines. This plasticizer is well known to be genotoxic and teratogenic in animals and to cause changes in various organs and enzyme systems even in humans. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of DEHP, extracted in the same way and in the same amount as in newborns, on livers of young rabbits. Methods: Prepubertal rabbits received lipid emulsion through central IV lines continuously for 3 weeks either via PVC or polyethylene (PE) infusion systems. Livers were examined after 1 and 3 weeks by light and electron microscopy. Results: By light microscopy, hydropic degeneration, single-cell necrosis, fibrosis, and bile duct proliferation were observed more in the PVC group. Electron microscopy revealed multiple nuclear changes, clusters and atypical forms of peroxisomes, proliferation of smooth endoplasmic reticulum, increased deposition of lipofuscin, and a mild perisinusoidal fibrosis only in the PVC group. These changes, which are generally regarded as reaction upon a toxic stimulus, could be exclusively attributed to DEHP. Conclusions: This investigation proved that DEHP produces toxin-like changes in livers of young rabbits in the same dose, duration, and method of administration as in newborn infants. For this reason, it is likely that DEHP is the substance that causes hepatobiliary dysfunction in newborns under PN. Possible modes of action of DEHP are proposed.

Pathophysiology and diagnosis of nephrocalcinosis

Nephrocalcinosis is the result of a myriad of hereditary or acquired diseases in the calcium, phosphate or oxalate metabolism that lead to deposition of calcium containing precipitates within the kidney. Nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis are pathophysiologically tightly related and often co-exist. In the case of recurrent nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis has to be excluded. Stone analysis can yield important clues to the underlying disease process. The best way to diagnose nephrocalcinosis and an accompanying nephrolithiasis is by native computer tomography scans. Untreated, nephrocalcinosis will lead to a progressive decline in renal function and eventually to end stage renal disease. Thus, for each case, the underlying disease process has to be determined and a causative therapy initiated.