Die Förderung des sportbezogenen Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepts mittels einer Intervention mit individueller Bezugsnormorientierung im Sportunterricht

Die Förderung der Persönlichkeitsentwicklung ist ein wichtiges Ziel des Sportunterrichts. Die vorliegende Studie nimmt sich der Überprüfung dieses pädagogischen Postulates bei zwölf Primarschulklassen (N = 221) an und untersucht die Veränderung des sportbezogenen Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepts mittels einer zwanzigwöchigen Intervention mit individueller Bezugsnormorientierung (nicht-randomisierte, kontrollierte Interventionsstudie mit prä-post Messwiederholung). Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass sich bei der Versuchsgruppe sowohl die individuelle Bezugsnormorientierung der Lehrperson als auch das sportbezogene Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept der Schülerinnen und Schüler positiv verändern. Auch wenn es sich bei diesen Veränderungen lediglich um kleine Effekte handelt, deuten diese auf die Möglichkeit einer Förderung des Selbstkonzeptes mittels einer individuellen Bezugsnormorientierung der Lehrperson im Sportunterricht hin. Forschungsmethodische Desiderate für zukünftige Interventionsstudien im Sportunterricht werden diskutiert.

Die Implementation einer Intervention zur Veränderung des Selbstkonzepts im Sportunterricht

Bei Studien zur Selbstkonzeptentwicklung fehlt meist der Hinweis auf die Programmumsetzung oder Implementation. Diesem Defizit der Implementationskontrolle nimmt sich die vorliegende Studie an und befasst sich mit der Messung und Erklärung der Implementationshäufigkeit im Rahmen einer Intervention zu Selbstkonzept förderndem Sportunterricht (NLehrer = 16, NSchüler = 309). Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Lehrpersonen eine individuumsorientierte, reflexive Sportvermittlung im Sportunterricht einsetzen. Die Implementationshäufigkeit der Lehrpersonen hängt von deren Berufserfahrung ab. Eine häufigere Implementation geht bei Schülerinnen und Schülern mit einer stärkeren Veränderung des Körperselbstwerts, jedoch nicht des sportbezogenen Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepts, einher.

Kognitive Grundlagen und motivationale Effekte individueller Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen. Ein informationsintegrationstheoretischer Zugang

Verschiedene Autoren gehen davon aus, dass der Glaube einer Gruppe an ihre Handlungsfähigkeit ein handlungs- und leistungsrelevanter Parameter ist (z. B. Bandura, 1997; Feltz, Short & Sullivan, 2008). Empirische Untersuchungen unterstützen diese Vermutung (z. B. Hodges & Carron, 1992) und es wird angenommen, dass Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen über motivationale Faktoren und Zielsetzungen kausal auf Gruppenleistungen wirken. Zur empirischen Theorieprüfung werden u. a. Fragebogen zur Erfassung individueller Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen eingesetzt. Solchen Fragebogen liegen Messmodelle zu Grunde, die Annahmen über die kognitiven Prozesse bei der Bildung individueller Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen machen und dazu dienen, individuelle Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen extern zu konstruieren (Anderson, 1996). Tatsächlich ist über die kognitiven Prozesse, durch die Personen zu ihren individuellen Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen gelangen, bislang wenig bekannt (Myers & Feltz, 2007). Diese kognitiven Prozesse stehen im Fokus dieser Arbeit und es soll untersucht werden, welche Gruppeneigenschaften und kontextuellen Bedingungen bei der Bildung individueller Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen berücksichtigt werden, wie sie zu einer subjektiven Handlungserwartung integriert werden und ob sich Unterschiede in den individuellen Konzepten aufgabenspezifischer Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen finden lassen. Aufgrund der Berichte über kausale Wirkbeziehungen zwischen Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen und Gruppenleistungen werden zudem die Zusammenhänge zwischen Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen und aufgabenbezogener Leistungsmotivation überprüft. Basierend auf einem theoretischen Modell zur Bildung individueller Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen werden Hypothesen zu kognitiven Informationsverarbeitungsprozessen formuliert. Als methodischer Zugang dient Andersons (1981, 1996) Informationsintegrationstheorie. Dreiundzwanzig Bachelor-Studierende der Sportwissenschaft (M = 23.30 Jahre; SD = 3.39; 35% Frauenanteil) der Universität Bern nahmen an den insgesamt sieben Erhebungen teil. Im Rahmen von Gruppenhandlungsszenarien wurden sie nach ihren Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen und/oder ihrer aufgabenspezifischen Leistungsmotivation gefragt. Zur statistischen Analyse wurden Mehrebenmodelle berechnet. Zusätzlich wurden graphische Informationsin-tegrationsdiagramme inhaltlich analysiert. Die Resultate weisen auf Abgleiche zwischen Aufgabenanforderungen und Mannschaftsressourcen als eine kognitive Grundlage individueller Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen hin. Diese Abgleiche beziehen sich auf physisch-technische wie auch psychologische Eigenschaften des Gruppenkontexts und scheinen durch Handlungspläne beeinflusst zu sein. Die Ergebnisse liefern zudem Anhaltspunkte für die externe Konstruktion von individuellen Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen und weisen auf bislang ungelöste Probleme bei der Operationalisierungen von Gruppenwirksamkeitserwartungen im Rahmen von Fragebogen hin. Mögliche weitere Einsatzgebiete für informationsintegrationstheoretische Methoden werden diskutiert.

Information Integration Theory and the Construction of Individually Perceived Group Efficacy

According to Bandura (1997) efficacy beliefs are a primary determinant of motivation. Still, very little is known about the processes through which people integrate situational factors to form efficacy beliefs (Myers & Feltz, 2007). The aim of this study was to gain insight into the cognitive construction of subjective group-efficacy beliefs. Only with a sound understanding of those processes is there a sufficient base to derive psychological interventions aimed at group-efficacy beliefs. According to cognitive theories (e.g., Miller, Galanter, & Pribram, 1973) individual group-efficacy beliefs can be seen as the result of a comparison between the demands of a group task and the resources of the performing group. At the center of this comparison are internally represented structures of the group task and plans to perform it. The empirical plausibility of this notion was tested using functional measurement theory (Anderson, 1981). Twenty-three students (M = 23.30 years; SD = 3.39; 35 % females) of the University of Bern repeatedly judged the efficacy of groups in different group tasks. The groups consisted of the subjects and another one to two fictive group members. The latter were manipulated by their value (low, medium, high) in task-relevant abilities. Data obtained from multiple full factorial designs were structured with individuals as second level units and analyzed using mixed linear models. The task-relevant abilities of group members, specified as fixed factors, all had highly significant effects on subjects’ group-efficacy judgments. The effect sizes of the ability factors showed to be dependent on the respective abilities’ importance in a given task. In additive tasks (Steiner, 1972) group resources were integrated in a linear fashion whereas significant interaction between factors was obtained in interdependent tasks. The results also showed that people take into account other group members’ efficacy beliefs when forming their own group-efficacy beliefs. The results support the notion that personal group-efficacy beliefs are obtained by comparing the demands of a task with the performing groups’ resources. Psychological factors such as other team members’ efficacy beliefs are thereby being considered task relevant resources and affect subjective group-efficacy beliefs. This latter finding underlines the adequacy of multidimensional measures. While the validity of collective efficacy measures is usually estimated by how well they predict performances, the results of this study allow for a somewhat internal validity criterion. It is concluded that Information Integration Theory holds potential to further help understand people’s cognitive functioning in sport relevant situations.

42'195 Meter ins Rampenlicht - Standortmarketing durch Marathonevents in Schweizer Städten

Mit der Durchführung von Sportevents werden vielfältige Hoffnungen verbunden. Unter anderem können Events Informationen über eine Destination transportieren und dadurch das zukünftige Verhalten von relevanten Zielgruppen wie Touristen oder Investoren beeinflussen. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht anhand von drei Marathonevents die Wechselwirkung zwischen Event und Destination sowie die Strategien zur Optimierung der positiven Effekte. Dabei zeigt sich, dass die Passung der Eventthematik zu den Destinationsschwerpunkten sowie der frühzeitige Einbezug aller relevanten Stake Holder Schlüsselrollen spielen. Alle drei betrachteten Marathonevents nehmen im Standortmarketing der jeweiligen Destination keine zentrale Rolle ein, sondern leisten in moderatem Umfang einen Beitrag zum Destination Branding.

Orienteering

Competitive orienteering is the sport of finding one’s way in unknown terrain with the help of a map and a compass; there may or may not be a time limit. Developed in Scandinavia, the sport was popularized first in Europe in the twentieth century and is now becoming popular around the world. Different disciplines include foot, ski, and bicycle orienteering, as well as trail orienteering for physically impaired persons. The sport offers different competition formats and age categories that allow participation with adapted physical and mental demands for all ages.

Comparing the validity and output of the GT1M and GT3X accelerometer in 5- to 9-year-old children

The purpose of this study was to compare the validity and output of the biaxial ActiGraph GT1M and the triaxial GT3X (ActiGraph, LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA)accelerometer in 5- to 9-year-old children. Thirty-two children wore the two monitors while their energy expenditure was measured with indirect calorimetry. They performed four locomotor and four play activities in an exercise laboratory and were further measured during 12 minutes of a sports lesson. Validity evidence in relation to indirect calorimetry was examined with linear regression equations applied to the laboratory data. During the sports lessons predicted energy expenditure according to the regression equations was compared to measured energy expenditure with the Wilcoxon-signed rank test and the Spearman correlation. To compare the output, agreement between counts of the two monitors during the laboratory activities was assessed with Bland-Altman plots. The evidence of validity was similar for both monitors. Agreement between the output of the two monitors was good for vertical counts (mean bias = −14 ± 22 counts) but not for horizontal counts (−17 ± 32 counts). The current results indicate that the two accelerometer models are able to estimate energy expenditure of a range of physical activities equally well in young children. However, they show output differences for movement in the horizontal direction.

Development and validation of energy expenditure prediction models based on GT3X accelerometer data in 5- to 9-year-old children

Background: Accelerometry has been established as an objective method that can be used to assess physical activity behavior in large groups. The purpose of the current study was to provide a validated equation to translate accelerometer counts of the triaxial GT3X into energy expenditure in young children. Methods: Thirty-two children aged 5–9 years performed locomotor and play activities that are typical for their age group. Children wore a GT3X accelerometer and their energy expenditure was measured with indirect calorimetry. Twenty-one children were randomly selected to serve as development group. A cubic 2-regression model involving separate equations for locomotor and play activities was developed on the basis of model fit. It was then validated using data of the remaining children and compared with a linear 2-regression model and a linear 1-regression model. Results: All 3 regression models produced strong correlations between predicted and measured MET values. Agreement was acceptable for the cubic model and good for both linear regression approaches. Conclusions: The current linear 1-regression model provides valid estimates of energy expenditure for ActiGraph GT3X data for 5- to 9-year-old children and shows equal or better predictive validity than a cubic or a linear 2-regression model.

Definition einer kritischen Situation im Fussball - Ergebnisse einer Experten-Fokusgruppe

Einleitung Bei der Untersuchung von Ausschreitungen bei Fußballspielen sind kritische Situationen (KS) interessant, die sich durch eine erhöhte Spannung auszeichnen, aber nicht immer in Gewalt enden. Es stellt sich die Frage, an welchen Merkmalen eine KS in situ erkannt werden kann, und ob dies mit theoretischen Erklärungen verglichen werden kann, wie z.B. mit dem Aggravation and Mitigation Model (Hylander & Guvå, 2010). Methode Um Kriterien einer KS festzulegen, wurde eine Fokusgruppe (Bohnsack, 2007) mit fünf Experten für Zuschauergewalt durchgeführt: zwei Polizisten mit Leitungsfunktion, zwei Fanarbeiter sowie ein Fanverantwortlicher eines Fussballstadions. In der ersten Phase gestalteten die Teilnehmer die Diskussion nach einer offenen einleitenden Frage möglichst autonom. In der zweiten Phase stellte die Moderatorin Fragen zur Klärung früherer Aussagen und bisher nicht erwähnten Themen. Angesprochen wurden das Fanverhalten, Alkoholkonsum und das Verhalten der Polizei. Die ersten beiden Autoren führten unabhängig eine zusammenfassende qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (Mayring, 2008) des transkribierten Gesprächs durch, um die Aussagen zu strukturieren und zu kategorisieren. Ergebnisse und Diskussion Verschiedene Kriterien zur Identifizierung einer KS wurden gefunden, beispielsweise „fehlende Distanz zwischen Fans und Polizei“, „Vermummung der Fans“, „Zusammenrücken der Fangruppe“ sowie „Aktionen ausserhalb der Fanrituale“. Diese und weitere Kategorien lassen sich vier Überkategorien zuordnen und damit strukturieren. Es gelang, durch die Methode der Fokusgruppe, relevante und beobachtbare Faktoren zu identifizieren, um kritische Situationen im Kontext der Fußballzuschauer auch dann zu erkennen, wenn es nicht zu Ausschreitungen kommt. Dies ist eine wichtige Voraussetzung, um die Dynamik der Gewalteskalation oder Mitigation im Feld untersuchen zu können. Literatur Bohnsack, R. (2007). Gruppendiskussion. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff & I. Steinke (Hrsg.), Qualitative For-schung: Ein Handbuch (5. Auflage) (S. 369-384). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Hylander, I., & Guvå, G. (2010). Misunderstanding of out-group behaviour: Different interpretations of the same crowd events among police officers and demonstrators. Nordic Psychology, 62, 25-47. Mayring, P. (2008).Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (10. Auflage). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.

Failure cue priming and impaired cognitive performance—analyses of avoidance motivation as a mediator and fear of failure as a moderator.

The present research investigates whether and how learned symbols for failure reduce task performance. We tested the effect of number priming in two countries with different learning histories for numbers. Priming numbers associated with failure (6 in Germany and 1 in Switzerland) were hypothesized to reduce performance. As expected, in Switzerland, priming with the failure number 1 reduced performance (Study 1), whereas in Germany, priming with the failure number 6 impaired performance in analogy tasks (Study 2). Study 2 additionally analyzed the mechanism and showed that the relationship between failure number priming and performance was mediated by evoked avoidance motivation and that dispositional fear of failure moderated this mediation.

Factors influencing the quality of the consultation process

Sport psychology services have become to be an important brick stone when building athletic success. The strive for better performance is not only a characteristic of athletes, but of the whole support system in top level sport including sport psychology. Sport psychology consultants are permanently challenged to deliver highest quality services to their clients if they do not want to lose their contracts. Sport psychologists are continuously improving their consulting skills, learn new intervention techniques, read scientific papers and, last but not least, gain experience by accumulating hours of deliberate practice (Ericsson) in sport psychology. Even with increasing experience, the consultant has a certain number of degrees of freedom and has to make a series of decisions about how he or she wants to work. Quality, however, depends on a number of issues, and not all of them are under direct control of the consultant. It is argued that, in order for these choices being good, the following factors - among others - must be considered: Who is seeking assistance? What are the "issues and problems" (Gardner & Moore, 2006) the athlete is confronted with? What kind of approaches do fit with the client's need? Who is the 'client' the sport psychologist is supposed to work with? If it is a team, is the sport psychologist supposed to work with a number of individuals, with the coach, or with the whole system? Where are the boundaries of the system? What is the role of the sport psychologist in the sport system? All these issues directly affect the process and outcome quality of the sport psychology consultant. A sound theoretical basis, in connection with a distinct philosophy of the intervention, is an important cornerstone for the quality of sport psychology consultation.

Efficient team actions: Outline of a theory of teams in sport

So far, social psychology in sport has preliminary focused on team cohesion, and many studies and meta analyses tried to demonstrate a relation between cohesiveness of a team and it's performance. How a team really co-operates and how the individual actions are integrated towards a team action is a question that has received relatively little attention in research. This may, at least in part, be due to a lack of a theoretical framework for collective actions, a dearth that has only recently begun to challenge sport psychologists. In this presentation a framework for a comprehensive theory of teams in sport is outlined and its potential to integrate the following presentations is put up for discussion. Based on a model developed by von Cranach, Ochsenbein and Valach (1986), teams are information processing organisms, and team actions need to be investigated on two levels: the individual team member and the group as an entity. Elements to be considered are the task, the social structure, the information processing structure and the execution structure. Obviously, different task require different social structures, communication and co-ordination. From a cognitivist point of view, internal representations (or mental models) guide the behaviour mainly in situations requiring quick reactions and adaptations, were deliberate or contingency planning are difficult. In sport teams, the collective representation contains the elements of the team situation, that is team task and team members, and of the team processes, that is communication and co-operation. Different meta-perspectives may be distinguished and bear a potential to explain the actions of efficient teams. Cranach, M. von, Ochsenbein, G., & Valach, L. (1986).The group as a self-active system: Outline of a theory of group action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 193-229.

Emotional contagion in team sports and its impact on individual performance – an experimental study

In sport psychology research about emotional contagion in sport teams has been scarce (Reicherts & Horn, 2008). Emotional contagion is a process leading to a specific emotional state in an individual caused by the perception of another individual’s emotional expression (Hatfield, Cacioppo & Rapson, 1994). Apitzsch (2009) described emotional contagion as one reason for collapsing sport teams. The present study examined the occurrence of emotional contagion in dyads during a basketball task and the impact of a socially induced emotional state on performance. An experiment with between-subjects design was conducted. Participants (N=81, ♀=38, M=21.33 years, SD=1.45) were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions, by joining a confederate to compose a same gender, ad hoc team. The team was instructed to perform a basketball task as quickly as possible. The between-factor of the experimental design was the confederate’s emotional expression (positive or negative valence). The within-factor was participants’ emotional state, measured pre- and post-experimentally using PANAS (Krohne, Egloff, Kohlmann & Tausch, 1996). The basketball task was video-taped and the number of frames participants needed to complete the task was used to determine the individual performance. The confederate’s emotional expression was appraised in a significantly different manner across both experimental conditions by participants and video raters (MC). Mixed between-within subjects ANOVAs were conducted to examine the impact of the two conditions on participants’ scores on the PANAS subscales across two time periods (pre- and post-experimental). No significant interaction effects but substantial main effects for time were found on both PANAS subscales. Both groups showed an increase in positive and a reduction in negative PANAS scores across these two time periods. Nevertheless, video raters assessment of the emotional states expressed by participants was significantly different between the positive (M=3.23, SD=0.45) and negative condition (M=2.39, SD=0.53; t=7.64, p<.001, eta squared=.43). An independent-samples t-test indicated no difference in performance between conditions. Furthermore, no significant correlation between the extent of positive or negative emotional contagion and the number of frames was observed. The basketball task lead to an improvement of the emotional state of participants, independently of the condition. Even though participants PANAS scores indicated a tendency to emotional contagion, it was not statistically significant. This could be explained by the low task duration of approximately three minutes. Moreover, the performance of participants was unaffected by the experimental condition or the extent of positive or negative emotional contagion. Apitzsch, E. (2009). A case study of a collapsing handball team. In S. Jern & J. Näslund (Eds.), Dynamics within and outside the lab. Proceedings from The 6th Nordic Conference on Group and Social Psychology, May 2008, Lund, pp. 35-52. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge: University Press. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W. & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der „Positive und Negative Affect Schedule“ (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42 (2), 139-156. Reicherts, M. & Horn, A. B. (2008). Emotionen im Sport. In W. Schlicht & B. Strauss (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Grundlagen der Sportpsychologie (Bd. 1) (S. 563-633). Göttingen: Hogrefe.