Does perioperative glucocorticosteroid treatment correlate with disturbance in surgical wound healing after treatment of facial fractures? A retrospective study

PURPOSE: To clarify whether perioperative glucocorticosteroid treatment used in association with repair of facial fractures predisposes to disturbance in surgical wound healing (DSWH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of records of patients who had undergone open reduction, with or without ostheosynthesis, or had received reconstruction of orbital wall fractures during the 2-year period from 2003 to 2004. RESULTS: Steroids were administered to 100 patients (35.7%) out of a total of 280. Dexamethasone was most often used, with the most common regimen being dexamethasone 10 mg every 8 hours over 16 hours, with a total dose of 30 mg. The overall DSWH rate was 3.9%. The DSWH rate for patients who had received perioperative steroids was 6.0%, and the corresponding rate for patients who did not receive steroids was 2.8%. The difference was not statistically significant. An intraoral surgical approach remained the only significant predictor to DSWH. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to DSWH, patients undergoing operative treatment of facial fractures can safely be administered doses of 30 mg or less of perioperative glucocorticosteroids equivalent to dexamethasone.

Retaining perivascular tissue of human saphenous vein grafts protects against surgical and distension-induced damage and preserves endothelial nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide synthase activity

OBJECTIVE: Conventional harvesting of saphenous vein used for coronary artery bypass surgery induces a vasospasm that is overcome by high-pressure distension. Saphenous vein harvested with its cushion of perivascular tissue by a "no touch" technique does not undergo vasospasm and distension is not required, leading to an improved graft patency. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of surgical damage and high-pressure distension on endothelial integrity and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and activity in saphenous vein harvested with and without perivascular tissue. METHODS: Saphenous veins from patients (n = 26) undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were prepared with and without perivascular tissue. We analyzed the effect of 300 mm Hg distension on morphology and endothelial nitric oxide synthase/nitric oxide synthase activity using a combination of immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme assay in distended (with and without perivascular tissue) compared with nondistended (with and without perivascular tissue) segments. RESULTS: Distension induced substantial damage to the luminal endothelium (assessed by CD31 staining) and vessel wall. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and activity were significantly reduced by high-pressure distension and removal of, or damage to, perivascular tissue. The effect of distension was significantly less for those with perivascular tissue than for those without perivascular tissue in most cases. CONCLUSION: The success of the saphenous vein used as a bypass graft is affected by surgical trauma and distension. Veins removed with minimal damage exhibit increased patency rates. We show that retention of perivascular tissue on saphenous vein prepared for coronary artery bypass surgery by the "no touch" technique protects against distension-induced damage, preserves vessel morphology, and maintains endothelial nitric oxide synthase/nitric oxide synthase activity.

Validation of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score in liver surgery

BACKGROUND: The estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) has been used to produce a numerical estimate of expected mortality and morbidity after elective gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study was to validate E-PASS in a selected cohort of patients requiring liver resections (LR). METHODS: In this retrospective study, E-PASS predictor equations for morbidity and mortality were applied to the prospective data from 243 patients requiring LR. The observed rates were compared with predicted rates using Fisher's exact test. The discriminative capability of E-PASS was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The observed and predicted overall mortality rates were both 3.3% and the morbidity rates were 31.3 and 26.9%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the comprehensive risk scores for deceased and surviving patients (p = 0.043). However, the scores for patients with or without complications were not significantly different (p = 0.120). Subsequent ROC curve analysis revealed a poor predictive accuracy for morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The E-PASS score seems to effectively predict mortality in this specific group of patients but is a poor predictor of complications. A new modified logistic regression might be required for LR in order to better predict the postoperative outcome.