Induction of RAGE shedding by activation of G-protein-coupled receptors

The multiligand Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products (RAGE) is involved in various pathophysiological processes, including diabetic inflammatory conditions and Alzheimers disease. Full-length RAGE, a cell surface-located type I membrane protein, can proteolytically be converted by metalloproteinases ADAM10 and MMP9 into a soluble RAGE form. Moreover, administration of recombinant soluble RAGE suppresses activation of cell surface-located RAGE by trapping RAGE ligands. Therefore stimulation of RAGE shedding might have a therapeutic value regarding inflammatory diseases. We aimed to investigate whether RAGE shedding is inducible via ligand-induced activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We chose three different GPCRs coupled to distinct signaling cascades: the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) activating adenylyl cyclase, the oxytocin receptor (OTR) linked to phospholipase Cβ, and the PACAP receptor (subtype PAC1) coupled to adenylyl cyclase, phospholipase Cβ, calcium signaling and MAP kinases. We generated HEK cell lines stably coexpressing an individual GPCR and full-length RAGE and then investigated GPCR ligand-induced activation of RAGE shedding. We found metalloproteinase-mediated RAGE shedding on the cell surface to be inducible via ligand-specific activation of all analyzed GPCRs. By using specific inhibitors we have identified Ca2+ signaling, PKCα/PKCβI, CaMKII, PI3 kinases and MAP kinases to be involved in PAC1 receptor-induced RAGE shedding. We detected an induction of calcium signaling in all our cell lines coexpressing RAGE and different GPCRs after agonist treatment. However, we did not disclose a contribution of adenylyl cyclase in RAGE shedding induction. Furthermore, by using a selective metalloproteinase inhibitor and siRNAmediated knock-down approaches, we show that ADAM10 and/or MMP9 are playing important roles in constitutive and PACAP-induced RAGE shedding. We also found that treatment of mice with PACAP increases the amount of soluble RAGE in the mouse lung. Our findings suggest that pharmacological stimulation of RAGE shedding might open alternative treatment strategies for Alzheimers disease and diabetes-induced inflammation.

Gamma-secretase modulators and inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease: influence of genetic background on efficacy and mechanism of action

According to the amyloid hypothesis, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is caused by aberrant production or clearance of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, and in particular of the longer more aggregation-prone Aβ42. The Aβ peptides are generated through successive proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the β-site APP cleaving enzyme (BACE) and γ-secretase. γ-secretase produces Aβ peptides with variable C-termini ranging from Aβ34 to Aβ48, presumably by sequential trimming of longer into shorter peptides. γ-secretase is a multiprotein complex consisting of at least four different proteins and the presenilin proteins (PS1 or PS2) contain the catalytic center of the complex. In 2001 several non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified as the founding members of a new class of γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) that can selectively reduce production of Aβ42. Concomitantly, these GSMs increase Aβ38 production indicating closely coordinated generation of Aβ42 and Aβ38 and a potential precursor-product relationship between these peptides. GSMs seem to exert their activity by direct modulation of γ-secretase. Support for this hypothesis is drawn from the finding that some PS mutations associated with early-onset familial AD (FAD) can modulate the cellular response to GSMs and to γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs), which inhibit production of all Aβ peptides and are known to directly interact with PS. A particularly interesting FAD PS mutation is PS1-ΔExon9, a complex deletion mutant that blocks endoproteolysis of PS1 and renders cells completely non-responsive to GSMs. Studies presented in this thesis show that the diminished response of PS1-ΔExon9 to GSMs is mainly caused by its lack of endoproteolytic cleavage. Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate that a reduced response to GSMs and GSIs is not limited to PS1-ΔExon9 but is a common effect of aggressive FAD-associated PS1 mutations. Surprisingly, we also found that while the Aβ42 response to GSMs is almost completely abolished by these PS1 mutations, the accompanying Aβ38 increase was indistinguishable to wild-type PS1. Finally, the reduced response to GSIs was confirmed in a mouse model with transgenic expression of an aggressive FAD-associated PS1 mutation as a highly potent GSI failed to reduce Aβ42 levels in brain of these mice. Taken together, our findings provide clear evidence for independent generation of Aβ42 and Aβ38 peptides, and argue that the sequential cleavage model might be an oversimplification of the molecular mechanism of γ-secretase. Most importantly, our results highlight the significance of genetic background in drug discovery efforts aimed at γ-secretase, and indicate that the use of cellular models with transgenic expression of FAD-associated PS mutations might confound studies of the potency and efficacy of GSMs and GSIs. Therefore, such models should be strictly avoided in the ongoing preclinical development of these promising and potentially disease-modifying therapeutics for AD.