Mechanistic study of the effects of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) on reporter gene expression in mammalian cells

DNA damage causes replication errors, leading to genetic instability or cell death. Besides that, many types of DNA base modifications have been shown to interfere with transcriptional elongation if they are located in the transcribed DNA strand of active genes, acting as roadblocks for RNA polymerases. It is widely assumed that transcription blockage by endogenous DNA damage is responsible for the early cell senescence in organs and accelerated ageing observed in individuals with compromised nucleotide excision repair.rnThe aims of this work were to design new experimental systems for testing transcription blocking potentials of DNA base modifications in an individual gene and to apply these test systems to the investigation of the effects of a frequent endogenously generated base modification, namely 8-oxo-7,8-hydroxyguanine (8-oxoG), on the gene transcription in cells. Several experimental strategies were employed for this purpose. First, I constructed an episomal vector encoding for a short-lived EGFP-ODC fusion protein and measured expression of the reporter gene in permanently transfected clonal cell lines exposed to DNA damaging agents. Second, the expression of plasmid-borne EGFP gene damaged with photosensitisers to obtain one or several oxidative purine modifications per plasmid molecule was determined in transiently transfected human and mouse host cells in an approach known as “host cell reactivation”. As a prerequisite for these experiments, a robust method of precise quantitative measurement of the EGFP gene expression in transiently transfected cells by flow cytometry was developed and validated. Third, I elaborated a very efficient procedure for insertion of synthetic oligonucleotides carrying 8-oxoG into plasmid DNA, avoiding any unwanted base damage and strand breaks. The consequences of 8-oxoG placed in defined positions in opposing DNA strands of the EGFP gene for transcription were measured by host cell reactivation in cells with functional 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) gene and in OGG1 null cells.rnThe results obtained in Ogg1-/- cells demonstrated that unrepaired 8-oxoG, even if situated in the transcribed DNA strand, does not have any negative effect on the reporter gene transcription. On the other hand, as few as one 8-oxoG was sufficient to cause a significant decrease of the gene expression in OGG1-proficient cell lines, i.e. in the presence of base excision repair. For two analysed positions of 8-oxoG in the plasmid DNA, the inhibition of gene transcription by the base modification correlated with the efficiency of its excision by purified OGG1 protein under cell-free conditions. Based on these findings, it has to be concluded that the observed decrease of transcription is mediated by excision of the base modification by OGG1 and probably caused by the repair-induced single-strand breaks. The mechanism of transcription inhibition by 8-oxoG is therefore clearly distinct from stalling of elongating RNA polymerase II complexes at the modified base.

Consequences of DNA damage for gene transcription : direct effects of modified nucleobases and the role of base excision repair = Folgen von DNA-Schäden für die Gentranskription

The presence of damaged nucleobases in DNA can negatively influence transcription of genes. One of the mechanisms by which DNA damage interferes with reading of genetic information is a direct blockage of the elongating RNA polymerase complexes – an effect well described for bulky adducts induced by several chemical substances and UV-irradiation. However, other mechanisms must exist as well because many of the endogenously occurring non-bulky DNA base modifications have transcription-inhibitory properties in cells, whilstrnnot constituting a roadblock for RNA polymerases under cell free conditions. The inhibition of transcription by non-blocking DNA damage was investigated in this work by employing the reporter gene-based assays. Comparison between various types of DNA damage (UV-induced pyrimidine photoproducts, oxidative purine modifications induced by photosensitisation, defined synthetic modified bases such as 8-oxoguanine and uracil, and sequence-specific single-strand breaks) showed that distinct mechanisms of inhibition of transcription can be engaged, and that DNA repair can influence transcription of the affectedrngenes in several different ways.rnQuantitative expression analyses of reporter genes damaged either by the exposure of cells to UV or delivered into cells by transient transfection supported the earlier evidence that transcription arrest at the damage sites is the major mechanism for the inhibition of transcription by this kind of DNA lesions and that recovery of transcription requires a functional nucleotide excision repair gene Csb (ERCC6) in mouse cells. In contrast, oxidisedrnpurines generated by photosensitisation do not cause transcriptional blockage by a direct mechanism, but rather lead to transcriptional repression of the damaged gene which is associated with altered histone acetylation in the promoter region. The whole chain of events leading to transcriptional silencing in response to DNA damage remains to be uncovered. Yet, the data presented here identify repair-induced single-strand breaks – which arise from excision of damaged bases by the DNA repair glycosylases or endonucleases – as arnputative initiatory factor in this process. Such an indirect mechanism was supported by requirement of the 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) for the inhibition of transcription by synthetic 8-oxodG incorporated into a reporter gene and by the delays observed for the inhibition of transcription caused by structurally unrelated base modifications (8-oxoguanine and uracil). It is thereby hypothesized that excision of the modified bases could be a generalrnmechanism for inhibition of transcription by DNA damage which is processed by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Further gene expression analyses of plasmids containing single-strand breaks or abasic sites in the transcribed sequences revealed strong transcription inhibitory potentials of these lesions, in agreement with the presumption that BER intermediates are largely responsible for the observed effects. Experiments with synthetic base modifications positioned within the defined DNA sequences showed thatrninhibition of transcription did not require the localisation of the lesion in the transcribed DNA strand; therefore the damage sensing mechanism has to be different from the direct encounters of transcribing RNA polymerase complexes with DNA damage.rnAltogether, this work provides new evidence that processing of various DNA basernmodifications by BER can perturb transcription of damaged genes by triggering a gene silencing mechanism. As gene expression can be influenced even by a single DNA damage event, this mechanism could have relevance for the endogenous DNA damage induced in cells under normal physiological conditions, with a possible link to gene silencing in general.