The importance of visual and olfactory stimuli during flower visits in Apis mellifera

Flowers attract honeybees using colour and scent signals. Bimodality (having both scent and colour) in flowers leads to increased visitation rates, but how the signals influence each other in a foraging situation is still quite controversial. We studied four basic questions: When faced with conflicting scent and colour information, will bees choose by scent and ignore the “wrong” colour, or vice versa? To get to the bottom of this question, we trained bees on scent-colour combination AX (rewarded) versus BY (unrewarded) and tested them on AY (previously rewarded colour and unrewarded scent) versus BX (previously rewarded scent and unrewarded colour). It turned out that the result depends on stimulus quality: if the colours are very similar (unsaturated blue and blue-green), bees choose by scent. If they are very different (saturated blue and yellow), bees choose by colour. We used the same scents, lavender and rosemary, in both cases. Our second question was: Are individual bees hardwired to use colour and ignore scent (or vice versa), or can this behaviour be modified, depending on which cue is more readily available in the current foraging context? To study this question, we picked colour-preferring bees and gave them extra training on scent-only stimuli. Afterwards, we tested if their preference had changed, and if they still remembered the scent stimulus they had originally used as their main cue. We came to the conclusion that a colour preference can be reversed through scent-only training. We also gave scent-preferring bees extra training on colour-only stimuli, and tested for a change in their preference. The number of animals tested was too small for statistical tests (n = 4), but a common tendency suggested that colour-only training leads to a preference for colour. A preference to forage by a certain sensory modality therefore appears to be not fixed but flexible, and adapted to the bee’s surroundings. Our third question was: Do bees learn bimodal stimuli as the sum of their parts (elemental learning), or as a new stimulus which is different from the sum of the components’ parts (configural learning)? We trained bees on bimodal stimuli, then tested them on the colour components only, and the scent components only. We performed this experiment with a similar colour set (unsaturated blue and blue-green, as above), and a very different colour set (saturated blue and yellow), but used lavender and rosemary for scent stimuli in both cases. Our experiment yielded unexpected results: with the different colours, the results were best explained by elemental learning, but with the similar colour set, bees exhibited configural learning. Still, their memory of the bimodal compound was excellent. Finally, we looked at reverse-learning. We reverse-trained bees with bimodal stimuli to find out whether bimodality leads to better reverse-learning compared to monomodal stimuli. We trained bees on AX (rewarded) versus BY (unrewarded), then on AX (unrewarded) versus BY (rewarded), and finally on AX (rewarded) and BY (unrewarded) again. We performed this experiment with both colour sets, always using the same two scents (lavender and rosemary). It turned out that bimodality does not help bees “see the pattern” and anticipate the switch. Generally, bees trained on the different colour set performed better than bees trained on the similar colour set, indicating that stimulus salience influences reverse-learning.

Oligomerization and protein-protein interactions of the sensory histidine kinase DcuS in Escherichia coli

DcuS is a membrane-integral sensory histidine kinase involved in the DcuSR two-component regulatory system in Escherichia coli by regulating the gene expression of C4-dicarboxylate metabolism in response to external stimuli. How DcuS mediates the signal transduction across the membrane remains little understood. This study focused on the oligomerization and protein-protein interactions of DcuS by using quantitative Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) spectroscopy. A quantitative FRET analysis for fluorescence spectroscopy has been developed in this study, consisting of three steps: (1) flexible background subtraction to yield background-free spectra, (2) a FRET quantification method to determine FRET efficiency (E) and donor fraction (fD = [donor] / ([donor]+[acceptor])) from the spectra, and (3) a model to determine the degree of oligomerization (interaction stoichiometry) in the protein complexes based on E vs. fD. The accuracy and applicability of this analysis was validated by theoretical simulations and experimental systems. These three steps were integrated into a computer procedure as an automatic quantitative FRET analysis which is easy, fast, and allows high-throughout to quantify FRET accurately and robustly, even in living cells. This method was subsequently applied to investigate oligomerization and protein-protein interactions, in particular in living cells. Cyan (CFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), two spectral variants of green fluorescent protein, were used as a donor-acceptor pair for in vivo measurements. Based on CFP- and YFP-fusions of non-interacting membrane proteins in the cell membrane, a minor FRET signal (E = 0.06 ± 0.01) can be regarded as an estimate of direct interaction between CFP and YFP moieties of fusion proteins co-localized in the cell membrane (false-positive). To confirm if the FRET occurrence is specific to the interaction of the investigated proteins, their FRET efficiency should be clearly above E = 0.06. The oligomeric state of DcuS was examined both in vivo (CFP/YFP) and in vitro (two different donor-acceptor pairs of organic dyes) by three independent experimental systems. The consistent occurrence of FRET in vitro and in vivo provides the evidence for the homo-dimerization of DcuS as full-length protein for the first time. Moreover, novel interactions (hetero-complexes) between DcuS and its functionally related proteins, citrate-specific sensor kinase CitA and aerobic dicarboxylate transporter DctA respectively, have been identified for the first time by intermolecular FRET in vivo. This analysis can be widely applied as a robust method to determine the interaction stoichiometry of protein complexes for other proteins of interest labeled with adequate fluorophores in vitro or in vivo.