Synthese und Charakterisierung von Polymeren mit peptidischen Seitenketten

Die Forschung im Bereich der Drug Delivery-Systeme konzentriert sich auf biokompatible und wenig immunogene Trägermoleküle. Eine Klasse vielversprechender Trägersysteme stellen Peptid basierte Polymere dar, die neben einer hohen Biokompatibilität auch eine Sensitivität gegenüber externen Einflüssen aufweisen. Der zwitterionische Charakter von Aminosäuren und Peptiden verhindert die Adsorption von Serumproteinen und ein „antifouling“ Verhalten kann festgestellt werden, sodass diese Moleküle für den Einsatz als Wirkstoffträgersystem sehr geeignet scheinen. In Kombination mit einer bürstenartigen Struktur entstehen Systeme mit einer einzigartigen Peptidarchitektur, die sich durch eine hohe Dichte funktioneller Gruppen für Konjugationsreaktionen auszeichnen und deren formabhängige Zellaufnahme sie besonders attraktiv für die Anwendung als „Nanocarrier“ macht.rnrnDas zwitterionische Poly-(ε-N-Methacryloyl-L-Lysin) (Mw = 721,000 g∙mol 1) wurde durch freie radikalische Polymerisation dargestellt und seine Konformation in Abhängigkeit von Ionenstärke und pH-Wert untersucht. Die Biokompatibilität des Systems konnte durch Toxizitätstests und dynamische Lichtstreuung in humanem Blutserum nachgewiesen werden. Zusammen mit der vernachlässigbaren unspezifischen Aufnahme in dendritische Zellen aus Knochenmark erfüllt das System damit alle Bedingungen, die an ein polymeres Wirkstoffträgersystem gestellt werden. Darüber hinaus können Komplexe des Polymers mit DNA in Gegenwart von divalenten Metallionen für die Gentransfektion verwendet werden.rnrnDurch Kopplung von ε-N-Methacryloyl-L-Lysin mit der Elastin-ähnlichen Polypeptid Pentasequenz Valin-Prolin-Glycin-Glycin-Glycin konnte ein Hexapeptid-Makromonomer dargestellt werden, welches anschließend mittels „grafting through“ Polymerisation zur Polymerbürste umgesetzt wurde. Die wurmartige Struktur der Polymerbürsten wurde in AFM-Aufnahmen gezeigt und eine hohe Kettensteifigkeit der Polymerbürsten über dynamische und statische Lichtstreuung nachgewiesen. Zirkulardichroismus-Messungen lieferten Informationen über struktur-, salz- und temperaturabhängige Veränderungen der Konformation. Toxizitätstests und dynamische Lichtstreuung in humanem Blutserum bestätigten die erwartete Biokompatibilität.rnrnBasierend auf zwei Elastin-ähnlichen Polypeptiden mit ähnlicher Peptidsequenz wurden insgesamt vier unterschiedliche Makromonomere mit jeweils 20 Pentapeptid-Wiederholungseinheiten dargestellt. Über anschließende „grafting through“ Polymerisation entstanden molekulare Bürstenmoleküle mit variierenden externen funktionellen Gruppen, die für zukünftige Konjugationsreaktionen verwendet werden können. Der Einfluss von Ionenstärke und Temperatur auf die Konformation der Makromonomere und Polymere wurde mittels Zirkulardichroismus- und Trübungskurven-Messungen untersucht und ein starker Einfluss der hohen Seitenkettendichte auf das Verhalten der Polymerbürsten wurde festgestellt. Über dynamische Lichtstreuung konnte ein von den externen funktionellen Gruppen abhängiges Aggregationsverhalten in humanem Blutserum nachgewiesen werden.rnrnDie in dieser Arbeit synthetisierten Polymerbürsten mit peptidischen Seitenketten stellen damit biokompatible und vielversprechende Trägersysteme für die Konjugation mit Biomolekülen dar, die zukünftig als Drug Delivery-Systeme ihren Einsatz finden können.rn

Synthese und Charakterisierung von zylindrischen Bürsten mit polypept(o)idischen Seitenketten als nanopartikuläre Trägersysteme

Zylindrische Polymerbürsten mit pept(o)idischen Seitenketten sind auf Grund ihrer elongierten Topologie, Bioverträglichkeit und hohen Dichte an funktionellen Gruppen vielversprechende Kandidaten für Anwendungen im Bereich des kontrollierten Wirkstoff- bzw. Gentransportes.In dieser Arbeit wurden Polylysin und Polysarkosin als Bestandteile der Seitenketten verwendet. Polylysin dient als positiv geladener Polypeptidblock für die Komplexierung von Polynukleotiden. Polysarkosin reduziert mit seinem „Stealth“-Effekt die Toxizität des Trägersystems und vermindert Wechselwirkungen mit dem Immunsystem. Über den „grafting from“-Ansatz und mit Hilfe der ringöffnenden NCA-Polymerisation konnten erstmals zylindrische Bürsten mit reinen Polysarkosin-Seitenketten sowie mit amphiphilen Seitenketten aus einem Polylysinkern und einer Polysarkosinschale hergestellt werden. Die Bürsten wurden mittels Lichtstreuung, GPC, CD-Spektroskopie und AFM charakterisiert. Die hohe Biokompatibilität beider Bürsten konnte durch Toxizitätstests und dynamische Lichtstreuung in humanem Blutserum nachgewiesen werden.Die Polysarkosin-Bürsten konnten zusätzlich an den Seitenkettenenden mit Azidgruppen funktionalisiert werden, welche eine effektive Biokonjugation ermöglichen. Die zylindrischen Bürsten zeigten nach ihrer Modifikation keine unspezifische Aufnahme in dendritische Zellen und könnten somit als Ausgangssubstanzen für die Synthese polymerbasierter Antikörper-Antigen-Konjugate in der Krebsimmuntherapie verwendet werden.Die Kern-Schale-Bürsten konnten erfolgreich mit siRNA komplexiert werden, ohne dass dabei eine Aggregation auftrat. In ersten Gen-Knockdown-Experimenten zeigten ihre Komplexe eine signifikante Verminderung der ApoB100-Proteinexpression in AML-12 Hepatozyten und könnten daher zukünftig als Transfektionsmittel in der Gentherapie ihren Einsatz finden.

Differential cell type-specific transcriptional regulation of the CYP1A1 gene

Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) monooxygenase plays an important role in the metabolism of environmental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs). Oxidation of these compounds converts them to the metabolites that subsequently can be conjugated to hydrophilic endogenous entities e.g. glutathione. Derivates generated in this way are water soluble and can be excreted in bile or urine, which is a defense mechanism. Besides detoxification, metabolism by CYP1A1 may lead to deleterious effects since the highly reactive intermediate metabolites are able to react with DNA and thus cause mutagenic effects, as it is in the case of benzo(a) pyrene (B[a]P). CYP1A1 is normally not expressed or expressed at a very low level in the cells but it is inducible by many PAHs and HAHs e.g. by B[a]P or 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Transcriptional activation of the CYP1A1 gene is mediated by aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor. In the absence of a ligand AHR stays predominantly in the cytoplasm. Ligand binding causes translocation of AHR to the nuclear compartment, its heterodimerization with another bHLH protein, the aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator (ARNT) and binding of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer to a DNA motif designated dioxin responsive element (DRE). This process leads to the transcriptional activation of the responsive genes containing DREs in their regulatory regions, e.g. that coding for CYP1A1. TCDD is the most potent known agonist of AHR. Since it is not metabolized by the activated enzymes, exposure to this compound leads to a persisting activation of AHR resulting in diverse toxic effects in the organism. To enlighten the molecular mechanisms that mediate the toxicity of xenobiotics like TCDD and related compounds, the AHR-dependent regulation of the CYP1A1 gene was investigated in two cell lines: human cervix carcinoma (HeLa) and mouse hepatoma (Hepa). Study of AHR activation and its consequence concerning expression of the CYP1A1 enzyme confirmed the TCDD-dependent formation of the AHR/ARNT complex on DRE leading to an increase of the CYP1A1 transcription in Hepa cells. In contrast, in HeLa cells formation of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer and binding of a protein complex containing AHR and ARNT to DRE occurred naturally in the absence of TCDD. Moreover, treatment with TCDD did not affect the AHR/ARNT dimer formation and binding of these proteins to DRE in these cells. Even though the constitutive complex on DRE exists in HeLa, transcription of the CYP1A1 gene was not increased. Furthermore, the CYP1A1 level in HeLa cells remained unchanged in the presence of TCDD suggesting repressional mechanism of the AHR complex function which may hinder the TCDD-dependent mechanisms in these cells. Similar to the native, the mouse CYP1A1-driven reporter constructs containing different regulatory elements were not inducible by TCDD in HeLa cells, which supported a presence of cell type specific trans-acting factor in HeLa cells able to repress both the native CYP1A1 and CYP1A1-driven reporter genes rather than species specific differences between CYP1A1 genes of human and rodent origin. The different regulation of the AHR-mediated transcription of CYP1A1 gene in Hepa and HeLa cells was further explored in order to elucidate two aspects of the AHR function: (I) mechanism involved in the activation of AHR in the absence of exogenous ligand and (II) factor that repress function of the exogenous ligand-independent AHR/ARNT complex. Since preliminary studies revealed that the activation of PKA causes an activation of AHR in Hepa cells in the absence of TCDD, the PKA-dependent signalling pathway was the proposed endogenous mechanism leading to the TCDD-independent activation of AHR in HeLa cells. Activation of PKA by forskolin or db-cAMP as well as inhibition of the kinase by H89 in both HeLa and Hepa cells did not lead to alterations in the AHR interaction with ARNT in the absence of TCDD and had no effect on binding of these proteins to DRE. Moreover, the modulators of PKA did not influence the CYP1A1 activity in these cells in the presence and in the absence of TCDD. Thus, an involvement of PKA in the regulation of the CYP1A1 Gen in HeLa cells was not evaluated in the course of this study. Repression of genes by transcription factors bound to their responsive elements in the absence of ligands has been described for nuclear receptors. These receptors interact with protein complex containing histone deacetylase (HDAC), enzyme responsible for the repressional effect. Thus, a participation of histone deacetylase in the transcriptional modulation of CYP1A1 gene by the constitutively DNA-bound AHR/ARNT complex was supposed. Inhibition of the HDAC activity by trichostatin A (TSA) or sodium butyrate (NaBu) led to an increase of the CYP1A1 transcription in the presence but not in the absence of TCDD in Hepa and HeLa cells. Since amount of the AHR and ARNT proteins remained unchanged upon treatment of the cells with TSA or NaBu, the transcriptional upregulation of CYP1A1 gene was not due to an increased expression of the regulatory proteins. These findings strongly suggest an involvement of HDAC in the repression of the CYP1A1 gene. Similar to the native human CYP1A1 also the mouse CYP1A1-driven reporter gene transfected into HeLa cells was repressed by histone deacetylase since the presence of TSA or NaBu led to an increase in the reporter activity. Induction of reporter gene did not require a presence of the promoter or negative regulatory regions of the CYP1A1 gene. A promoter-distal fragment containing three DREs together with surrounding sequences was sufficient to mediate the effects of the HDAC inhibitors suggesting that the AHR/ARNT binding to its specific DNA recognition site may be important for the CYP1A1 repression. Histone deacetylase is recruited to the specific genes by corepressors, proteins that bind to the transcription factors and interact with other members of the HDAC complex. Western blot analyses revealed a presence of HDAC1 and the corepressors mSin3A (mammalian homolog of yeast Sin3) and SMRT (silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) in both cell types, while the corepressor NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) was expressed exclusively in HeLa cells. Thus the high inducibility of CYP1A1 in Hepa cells may be due to the absence of NCoR in these cells in contrast to the non-responsive HeLa cells, where the presence of NCoR would support repression of the gene by histone deacetylase. This hypothesis was verified in reporter gene experiments where expression constructs coding for the particular members of the HDAC complex were cotransfected in Hepa cells together with the TCDD-inducible reporter constructs containing the CYP1A1 regulatory sequences. An overexpression of NCoR however did not decrease but instead led to a slight increase of the reporter gene activity in the cells. The expected inhibition was observed solely in the case of SMRT that slightly reduced constitutive and TCDD-induced reporter gene activity. A simultaneous expression of NCoR and SMRT shown no further effects and coexpression of HDAC1 with the two corepressors did not alter this situation. Thus, additional factors that are likely involved in the repression of CYP1A1 gene by HDAC complex remained to be identified. Taking together, characterisation of an exogenous ligand independent AHR/ARNT complex on DRE in HeLa cells that repress transcription of the CYP1A1 gene creates a model system enabling investigation of endogenous processes involved in the regulation of AHR function. This study implicates HDAC-mediated repression of CYP1A1 gene that contributes to the xenobiotic-induced expression in a tissue specific manner. Elucidation of these processes gains an insight into mechanisms leading to deleterious effects of TCDD and related compounds.

Mechanistic study of cell death induction by O 6-methylating agents, focusing on the role of homologous recombination as a molecular target for sensitization of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic alkylating agents

Chemotherapeutic SN1‑methylating agents are important anticancer drugs. They induce several covalent modifications in the DNA, from which O6‑methylguanine (O6MeG) is the main toxic lesion. In this work, different hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the mechanism of O6MeG‑triggered cell death were tested. The results of this work support the abortive processing model, which states that abortive post‑replicative processing of O6MeG‑driven mispairs by the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) machinery results in single‑strand gaps in the DNA that, upon a 2nd round of DNA replication, leads to DNA double‑strand break (DSB) formation, checkpoint activation and cell death. In this work, it was shown that O6MeG induces an accumulation of cells in the 2nd G2/M‑phase after treatment. This was accompanied by an increase in DSB formation in the 2nd S/G2/M‑phase, and paralleled by activation of the checkpoint kinases ATR and CHK1. Apoptosis was activated in the 2nd cell cycle. A portion of cells continue proliferating past the 2nd cell cycle, and triggers apoptosis in the subsequent generations. An extension to the original model is proposed, where the persistence of O6MeG in the DNA causes new abortive MMR processing in the 2nd and subsequent generations, where new DSB are produced triggering cell death. Interestingly, removal of O6MeG beyond the 2nd generation lead to a significant, but not complete, reduction in apoptosis, pointing to the involvement of additional mechanisms as a cause of apoptosis. We therefore propose that an increase in genomic instability resulting from accumulation of mis‑repaired DNA damage plays a role in cell death induction. Given the central role of DSB formation in toxicity triggered by chemotherapeutic SN1‑alkylating agents, it was aimed in the second part of this thesis to determine whether inhibition of DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR) or non‑homologous end joining (NHEJ) is a reasonable strategy for sensitizing glioblastoma cells to these agents. The results of this work show that HR down‑regulation in glioblastoma cells impairs the repair of temozolomide (TMZ)‑induced DSB. HR down‑regulation greatly sensitizes cells to cell death following O6‑methylating (TMZ) or O6‑chlorethylating (nimustine) treatment, but not following ionizing radiation. The RNAi mediated inhibition in DSB repair and chemo‑sensitization was proportional to the knockdown of the HR protein RAD51. Chemo‑sensitization was demonstrated for several HR proteins, in glioma cell lines proficient and mutated in p53. Evidence is provided showing that O6MeG is the primary lesion responsible for the increased sensitivity of glioblastoma cells following TMZ treatment, and that inhibition of the resistance marker MGMT restores the chemo‑sensitization achieved by HR down‑regulation. Data are also provided to show that inhibition of DNA‑PK dependent NHEJ does not significantly sensitized glioblastoma cells to TMZ treatment. Finally, the data also show that PARP inhibition with olaparib additionally sensitized HR down‑regulated glioma cells to TMZ. Collectively, the data show that processing of O6MeG through two rounds of DNA replication is required for DSB formation, checkpoint activation and apoptosis induction, and that O6MeG‑triggered apoptosis is also executed in subsequent generations. Furthermore, the data provide proof of principle evidence that down‑regulation of HR is a reasonable strategy for sensitizing glioma cells to killing by O6‑alkylating chemotherapeutics.