Untersuchung der zellulären Antwort von Tumor und Endothelium auf radioaktive Bestrahlung in vitro und in vivo

Tumore des Kopf-Hals Bereiches sprechen aufgrund schneller Resistenzbildung häufig schlecht auf die derzeit praktizierten Bestrahlungstherapien an. Der Erfolg dieser Behandlung wird dabei maßgeblich durch die Strahlenresistenz des malignen Gewebes limitiert. Das Verständnis der zugrunde liegenden zellulären und molekularen Mechanismen ist diesbezüglich unvollständig. Die Resistenzzunahme während der klinischen Behandlung könnte durch die Selektion strahlenresistenter Einzelzellen verursacht werden oder durch die Aktivierung von Resistenzmechanismen. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wurde die bestrahlungsvermittelte Freisetzung möglicherweise protektiv wirkender Faktoren durch Tumorzelllinien des Kopf-Hals Bereiches untersucht. Durch Bestrahlung erfolgte eine Induktion von VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) und FGF-2 (fibroblast growth factor 2), IL-8 (Interleukin-8) und PGE2 (Prostaglandin E2). Die Untersuchung von VEGF und FGF-2 zeigte weiterhin ein zytoprotektives Potential dieser Faktoren, d.h. die T

Mechanisms of resistance of tumor cells in response to treatment with the vacuolar H+-ATPase inhibitor archazolid B

Resistance of cancer cells towards chemotherapy is the major cause of therapy failure. Hence, the evaluation of cellular defense mechanisms is essential in the establishment of new chemotherapeutics. In this study, classical intrinsic and acquired as well as new resistance mechanisms relevant in the cellular response to the novel vacuolar H+-ATPase inhibitor archazolid B were investigated. Archazolid B, originally produced by the myxobacterium Archangium gephyra, displayed cytotoxicity in the low nanomolar range on a panel of cancer cell lines. The drug showed enhanced cytotoxic activity against nearly all cancerous cells compared to their non-cancerous pendants. With regards to ABC transporters, archazolid B was identified as a moderate substrate of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) and a weak substrate of ABCG2 (BCRP), whereas hypersensitivity was observed in ABCB5-expressing cells. The cytotoxic effect of archazolid B was shown to be independent of the cellular p53 status. However, cells expressing constitutively active EGFR displayed significantly increased resistance. Acquired drug resistance was studied by establishing an archazolid B-resistant MCF-7 cell line. Experiments showed that this secondary resistance was not conferred by aberrant expression or DNA mutations of the gene encoding vacuolar H+-ATPase subunit c, the direct target of archazolid B. Instead, a slight increase of ABCB1 and a significant overexpression of EGFR as well as reduced proliferation may contribute to acquired archazolid B resistance. For identification of new resistance strategies upon archazolid B treatment, omics data from bladder cancer and glioblastoma cells were analyzed, revealing drastic disturbances in cholesterol homeostasis, affecting cholesterol biosynthesis, uptake and transport. As shown by filipin staining, archazolid B led to accumulation of free cholesterol in lysosomes, which triggered sterol responses, mediated by SREBP-2 and LXR, including up-regulation of HMGCR, the key enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesis. Furthermore, inhibition of LDL uptake as well as impaired LDLR surface expression were observed, indicating newly synthesized cholesterol to be the main source of cholesterol in archazolid B-treated cells. This was proven by the fact that under archazolid B treatment, total free cholesterol levels as well as cell survival were significantly reduced by inhibiting HMGCR with fluvastatin. The combination of archazolid B with statins may therefore be an attractive strategy to circumvent cholesterol-mediated cell survival and in turn potentiate the promising anticancer effects of archazolid B.