Identifikation des Gruppe I Introns CDISt1 in offenen Leserastern des Clostridium difficile Genoms und dessen Charakterisierung als chimäres genetisches Element

Im tcdA-Gen des Clostridium difficile Stammes C34 wurde eine Insertion mit einer Größe von 1975 bp lokalisiert. Der als CdISt1 bezeichneten Insertion konnten charakteristische Merkmale von Gruppe I Introns und von Insertionselementen zugewiesen werden. Dem im 5’ Bereich gelegenen Anteil ließen sich die Intron-spezifischen Eigenschaften zuordnen, im 3’ Anteil wurden zwei offene Leseraster gefunden, die hohe Homologien zu Transposasen der IS605 Familie hatten. Funktionelle Analysen belegten die Spleißaktivität des chimären Ribozymes. CdISt1 konnte in mehren Kopien in allen untersuchten C. difficile Stämmen nachgewiesen werden. In anderen clostridialen Spezies konnte das Gruppe I Intron bislang nicht vorgefunden werden. Der Integrationsort in C. difficile war in allen untersuchten Fällen immer ein offenes Leseraster. Bislang waren Gruppe I Introns noch nie in bakteriellen offenen Leserastern beschrieben worden. Es kann angenommen werden, dass der chimäre Aufbau des Ribozymes die Integration in bakterielle offene Leseraster ermöglicht. Dabei wäre für die Spleißaktivität der Gruppe I Intron Anteil maßgeblich, die Mobilität würde über den IS Element Anteil vermittelt. Im Rahmen der Dissertationsarbeit konnten erste experimentelle Hinweise erbracht werden, dass das chimäre Ribozym an der evolution clostridialer Proteine beteiligt sein kann, wovon seinen Wirt C. difficile entsprechend profitieren würde.An insertion of 1975 bp is situated in the tcdA-gene of Clostridium difficile strain C34. The insertion was designated as CdISt1 and it had characteristics of group I introns and insertion elements. The group I characteristcs could be found in the 5’ area of the genetic element, in the 3’ area two open reading frames were located with high homologies to transposases of the IS605 family. Functional studies could proof the splicing activity of the ribozyme. CdISt1 could be found in several copies in all C. difficile strains examined so far. It was absent in other examined clostridial species. In all cases, the integration site in C. difficile was an open reading frame. Up to now, group I introns never were discovered in bacterial open reading frames. It can be assumed that the chimeric characteristics of the ribozyme permit an integration in bacterial open reading frames. The group I intron part would be responsible of the splicing activity, the IS element part could mediate the mobility of the genetic element. First experimental evidences point to a possible involvement of the chimeric ribozyme in the evolution of clostridial proteins, so the host C. difficile could benefit from its presence.

Analysing the possible influence of transposon TCl4.7 insertion on the function of the genome of Cydia pomonella granulovirus

CpGV-MCp5 is a natural mutant of the Cydia pomonella Granulovirus (Mexican isolate) (CpGV-M) that harbors an insect host transposon termed TCl4.7 in its genome. TCl4.7 is located between the open reading frames Cp15 and Cp16 and separates two homologous regions hr3 and hr4, which have been recently shown to be origins of replication of CpGV-M. The MCp5 has a significant replication disadvantage in the presence of the wild-type CpGV-M. In this study, the possible effects of TCl4.7 transposon insertion on the genome function of its insertion site has been analysed. The role of Cp15 and Cp16 in the context of the virus infection cycle was examined by generating a CpGV-Bacmid (CpBAC) and Cp15 knock-out (CpBACCp15KO) and Cp16 knock-out (CpBACCp16KO) mutants. The mutant CpBACCp15KO was not able to replicate in CM larvae suggesting that Cp15 was essential for virus replication. In contrast, the mutant CpBACCp16KO infected CM larvae and produced viable occlusion bodies (OBs) demonstrating that Cp16 is a non-essential gene for virus in vivo infection of C. pomonella. The temporal transcription of Cp15 and Cp16, as well as of Cp31 (F protein) as a control, was analysed using RT-PCR and quantitative real-time PCR. It suggested a general delay or reduction of gene transcription of MCp5 compared to the parental CpGV-M. Western blot analyses using anti-Cp15 and anti-Cp16 polyclonal antibodies, however, did not show any immuno-reactive response. Thus, a direct influence of TCl4.7 on the expression of Cp15 and Cp16 could not be substantiated. To investigate whether the interruption of hr3 and hr4 palindromes affects the virus replication, two mutant bacmids with a deletion of hr3 and hr4 (CpBAChr3/hr4-KO) and another with an insertion of a Kanamycin resistance cassette between hr3 and hr4 (CpBAChr3-kan-hr4) were generated. Both mutant bacmids replicated and produced infectious virus OBs, which did not significantly differ in their median lethal concentration (LC50) and median survival time (ST50) compared to the parental CpBAC. Interestingly, the mutant CpBAChr3-kan-hr4 was very effectively out-competed by parental CpBAC, when CM larvae were co-infected with known ratios of OBs of CpBAC and the mutant CpBAChr3-kan-hr4. These observations suggested a functional co-operation between hr3 and hr4 which was interrupted by the KanR insertion in CpBAChr3-kan-hr4 and possibly by TCl4.7 transposon insertion in the mutant MCp5. This hypothesis may explain the observed replication disadvantage of the mutants MCp5 and CpBAChr3-kan-hr4 in the presence of the parental viruses CpGV-M and CpBAC, respectively.