Chimäre Archonta?: vergleichend-morphologische Studien zur Hyolaryngealregion

Chimäre Archonta? Vergleichend-morphologische Studien zur Hyolaryngealregion. Mit Brevia zur Dental- und Tarsalmorphologie. Die Dissertation greift aus phylogenetisch-systematischer Perspektive das Problem des Primatenursprungs auf. Traditionell wurde die Überordnung Archonta (= Primates + Scandentia + Dermoptera + Chiroptera) angenommen, die aufgrund molekularer Befunde nicht mehr als valide eingestuft wird. Eine Klassifikation anhand der Superordo Euarchontoglires (= Primates + Scandentia + Dermoptera + Glires) wird derzeit bevorzugt. Beide Verwandtschaftshypothesen werden in den taxonomischen Analysen berücksichtigt, um den potentiellen Einfluss der Außengruppenwahl auf die Konstellation der Euarchonta (= Primates + Dermoptera + Scandentia) zu bestimmen. Der Schwerpunkt der Untersuchung liegt in der 3D-Rekonstruktion ontogenetischer Stadien der Hyolaryngealregion diverser Spezies der Ordnungen Artiodactyla, Chiroptera, Dermoptera, Primates, Rodentia, Scandentia und Soricomorpha. Mit AMIRA® 3.1.1 konnten basierend auf histologischen Schnittserien 18 dreidimensionale Modelle der überwiegend spätfetalen Zungenbein- und Kehlkopfregion dargestellt werden. Durch das Studium der Knorpelmorphologie und der Larynx-Myologie wurden 150 Merkmale definiert und in eine MacClade®-Datenmatrix überführt. Die auf dem Parsimonie-Prinzip basierenden PAUP®-Analysen sprechen für eine Schwestergruppenbeziehung der Primates und der Dermoptera (= Primatomorpha). Die als Chimäre titulierte Überordnung Archonta wurde als Vehikel verwendet, um die Integration der Chiropteren zu ermöglichen und die Hyolaryngealforschung zu intensivieren, da auch Echolot-Peilung verwendende Taxa Bestandteil der Untersuchung waren. Die morphologischen Ähnlichkeiten des Zungenbein- und Kehlkopfapparates zwischen der basalen Form Rousettus (Pteropodidae) und dem Dermoptera-Vertreter Cynocephalus wurden als symplesiomorphe Merkmale gedeutet. Bei der Außengruppenwahl eines Rodentia-Repräsentanten hingegen konnte in Übereinstimmung mit den molekularen Befunden und nach dem Gros der Lehrmeinung die Schwestergruppenbeziehung der Primates und der Sundatheria bestätigt werden. Zwecks eines umfassenderen Ansatzes wurden im Rahmen einer „total evidence“-Methodik dental- und tarsalmorphologische Merkmale integriert. Das Resultat der Clusteranalyse, basierend auf 263 Merkmalen, modifiziert das Zwischenergebnis und befürwortet in Übereinstimmung mit molekularen Daten als Schwestergruppe der Primaten das Taxon Sundatheria (= Dermoptera + Scandentia). Damit konnte erstmals mittels eines konsequenten phylogenetisch-systematischen Ansatzes der Primaten-Grundplan hinsichtlich der Merkmalsausstattung der Hyolaryngealregion mit 27 Merkmalen rekonstruiert werden. Der Primatenursprung kann mit dem Euarchonta-Grundplan rekonstruiert werden. Für die Sundatheria wurden 12 Grundplanmerkmale definiert

The prehistoric inhabitants of the Wadi Howar : an anthropological study of human skeletal remains from the Sudanese part of the Eastern Sahara

All currently available human skeletal remains from the Wadi Howar (Eastern Sahara, Sudan) were employed in an anthropological study. The study’s first aim was to describe this unique 5th to 2nd millennium BCE material, which comprised representatives of all three prehistoric occupation phases of the region. Detecting diachronic differences in robusticity, occupational stress levels and health within the spatially, temporally and culturally heterogeneous sample was its second objective. The study’s third goal was to reveal metric and non-metric affinities between the different parts of the series and between the Wadi Howar material and other relevant prehistoric as well as modern African populations. rnThe reconstruction and comprehensive osteological analysis of 23 as yet unpublished individuals, the bulk of the Wadi Howar series, constituted the first stage of the study. The analyses focused on each individual’s in situ position, state of preservation, sex, age at death, living height, living weight, physique, biological ancestry, epigenetic traits, robusticity, occupational stress markers, health and metric as well as morphological characteristics. Building on the results of these efforts and the re-examination of the rest of the material, the Wadi Howar series as a whole, altogether 32 individuals, could be described. rnA wide variety of robusticity, occupational stress and health variables was evaluated. The pre-Leiterband (hunter-gatherer-fisher/hunter-gatherer-fisher-herder) and the Leiterband (herder-gatherer) data of over a third of these variables differed statistically significantly or in tendency from each other. The Leiterband sub-sample was characterised by higher enamel hypoplasia frequencies, lower mean ages at death and less pronounced expressions of occupational stress traits. This pattern was interpreted as evidence that the adoption and intensification of animal husbandry did probably not constitute reactions to worsening conditions. Apart from that, the relevant observations, noteworthy tendencies and significant differences were explained as results of a broader spectrum of pre-Leiterband subsistence activities and the negative side effects of the increasingly specialised herder-gatherer economy of the Leiterband phase. rnUsing only the data which could actually be collected from it, multiple, separate, individualised discriminant function analyses were carried out for each Wadi Howar skeleton to determine which prehistoric and which modern comparative sample it was most similar to. The results of all individual analyses were then summarised and examined as a whole. Thus it became possible to draw conclusions about the affinities the Wadi Howar material shared with prehistoric as well as modern populations and to answer questions concerning the diachronic links between the Wadi Howar’s prehistoric populations. When the Wadi Howar remains were positioned in the context of the selected prehistoric (Jebel Sahaba/Tushka, A-Group, Malian Sahara) and modern comparative samples (Southern Sudan, Chad, Mandinka, Somalis, Haya) in this fashion three main findings emerged. Firstly, the series as a whole displayed very strong affinities with the prehistoric sample from the Malian Sahara (Hassi el Abiod, Kobadi, Erg Ine Sakane, etc.) and the modern material from Southern Sudan and, to a lesser extent, Chad. Secondly, the pre-Leiterband and the Leiterband sub-sample were closer to the prehistoric Malian as well as the modern Southern Sudanese material than they were to each other. Thirdly, the group of pre-Leiterband individuals approached the Late Pleistocene sample from Jebel Sahaba/Tushka under certain circumstances. A theory offering explanations for these findings was developed. According to this theory, the entire prehistoric population of the Wadi Howar belonged to a Saharo-Nilotic population complex. The Jebel Sahaba/Tushka population constituted an old Nilotic and the early population of the Malian Sahara a younger Saharan part of this complex. The pre-Leiterband groups probably colonised the Wadi Howar from the east, either during or soon after the original Saharo-Nilotic expansion. Unlike the pre-Leiterband groups, the Leiterband people originated somewhere west of the Wadi Howar. They entered the region in the context of a later, secondary Saharo-Nilotic expansion. In the process, the incoming Leiterband groups absorbed many members of the Wadi Howar’s older pre-Leiterband population. The increasing aridification of the Wadi Howar region ultimately forced its prehistoric inhabitants to abandon the wadi. Most of them migrated south and west. They, or groups closely related to them, probably were the ancestors of the majority of the Nilo-Saharan-speaking pastoralists of modern-day Southern Sudan and Eastern Chad.

Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of Juncaginaceae

I investigated the systematics, phylogeny and biogeographical history of Juncaginaceae, a small family of the early-diverging monocot order Alismatales which comprises about 30 species of annual and perennial herbs. A wide range of methods from classical taxonomy to molecular systematic and biogeographic approaches was used. rnrnIn Chapter 1, a phylogenetic analysis of the family and members of Alismatales was conducted to clarify the circumscription of Juncaginaceae and intrafamilial relationships. For the first time, all accepted genera and those associated with the family in the past were analysed together. Phylogenetic analysis of three molecular markers (rbcL, matK, and atpA) showed that Juncaginaceae are not monophyletic. As a consequence the family is re-circumscribed to exclude Maundia which is pro-posed to belong to a separate family Maundiaceae, reducing Juncaginaceae to include Tetroncium, Cycnogeton and Triglochin. Tetroncium is weakly supported as sister to the rest of the family. The reinstated Cycnogeton (formerly included in Triglochin) is highly supported as sister to Triglochin s.str. Lilaea is nested within Triglochin s. str. and highly supported as sister to the T. bulbosa complex. The results of the molecular analysis are discussed in combination with morphological characters, a key to the genera of the family is given, and several new combinations are made.rnrnIn Chapter 2, phylogenetic relationships in Triglochin were investigated. A species-level phylogeny was constructed based on molecular data obtained from nuclear (ITS, internal transcribed spacer) and chloroplast sequence data (psbA-trnH, matK). Based on the phylogeny of the group, divergence times were estimated and ancestral distribution areas reconstructed. The monophyly of Triglochin is confirmed and relationships between the major lineages of the genus were resolved. A clade comprising the Mediterranean/African T. bulbosa complex and the American T. scilloides (= Lilaea s.) is sister to the rest of the genus which contains two main clades. In the first, the widespread T. striata is sister to a clade comprising annual Triglochin species from Australia. The second clade comprises T. palustris as sister to the T. maritima complex, of which the latter is further divided into a Eurasian and an American subclade. Diversification in Triglochin began in the Miocene or Oligocene, and most disjunctions in Triglochin were dated to the Miocene. Taxonomic diversity in some clades is strongly linked to habitat shifts and can not be observed in old but ecologically invariable lineages such as the non-monophyletic T. maritima.rnrnChapter 3 is a collaborative revision of the Triglochin bulbosa complex, a monophyletic group from the Mediterranean region and Africa. One new species, Triglochin buchenaui, and two new subspecies, T. bulbosa subsp. calcicola and subsp. quarcicola, from South Africa were described. Furthermore, two taxa were elevated to species rank and two reinstated. Altogether, seven species and four subspecies are recognised. An identification key, detailed descriptions and accounts of the ecology and distribution of the taxa are provided. An IUCN conservation status is proposed for each taxon.rnrnChapter 4 deals with the monotypic Tetroncium from southern South America. Tetroncium magellanicum is the only dioecious species in the family. The taxonomic history of the species is described, type material is traced, and a lectotype for the name is designated. Based on an extensive study of herbarium specimens and literature, a detailed description of the species and notes on its ecology and conservation status are provided. A detailed map showing the known distribution area of T. magellanicum is presented. rnrnIn Chapter 5, the flower structure of the rare Australian endemic Maundia triglochinoides (Maundiaceae, see Chapter 1) was studied in a collaborative project. As the morphology of Maundia is poorly known and some characters were described differently in the literature, inflorescences, flowers and fruits were studied using serial mictrotome sections and scanning electron microscopy. The phylogenetic placement, affinities to other taxa, and the evolution of certain characters are discussed. As Maundia exhibits a mosaic of characters of other families of tepaloid core Alismatales, its segregation as a separate family seems plausible.