Radiolabeling of defined polymer architectures with fluorine-18 and iodine-131 for ex vivo and in vivo evaluation : visualization of structure-property relationships

Nuclear medicine imaging techniques such as PET are of increasing relevance in pharmaceutical research being valuable (pre)clinical tools to non-invasively assess drug performance in vivo. Therapeutic drugs, e.g. chemotherapeutics, often suffer from a poor balance between their efficacy and toxicity. Here, polymer based drug delivery systems can modulate the pharmacokinetics of low Mw therapeutics (prolonging blood circulation time, reducing toxic side effects, increasing target site accumulation) and therefore leading to a more efficient therapy. In this regard, poly-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-methacrylamide (HPMA) constitutes a promising biocompatible polymer. Towards the further development of these structures, non-invasive PET imaging allows insight into structure-property relationships in vivo. This performant tool can guide design optimization towards more effective drug delivery. Hence, versatile radiolabeling strategies need to be developed and establishing 18F- as well as 131I-labeling of diverse HPMA architectures forms the basis for short- as well as long-term in vivo evaluations. By means of the prosthetic group [18F]FETos, 18F-labeling of distinct HPMA polymer architectures (homopolymers, amphiphilic copolymers as well as block copolymers) was successfully accomplished enabling their systematic evaluation in tumor bearing rats. These investigations revealed pronounced differences depending on individual polymer characteristics (molecular weight, amphiphilicity due to incorporated hydrophobic laurylmethacrylate (LMA) segments, architecture) as well as on the studied tumor model. Polymers showed higher uptake for up to 4 h p.i. into Walker 256 tumors vs. AT1 tumors (correlating to a higher cellular uptake in vitro). Highest tumor concentrations were found for amphiphilic HPMA-ran-LMA copolymers in comparison to homopolymers and block copolymers. Notably, the random LMA copolymer P4* (Mw=55 kDa, 25% LMA) exhibited most promising in vivo behavior such as highest blood retention as well as tumor uptake. Further studies concentrated on the influence of PEGylation (‘stealth effect’) in terms of improving drug delivery properties of defined polymeric micelles. Here, [18F]fluoroethylation of distinct PEGylated block copolymers (0%, 1%, 5%, 7%, 11% of incorporated PEG2kDa) enabled to systematically study the impact of PEG incorporation ratio and respective architecture on the in vivo performance. Most strikingly, higher PEG content caused prolonged blood circulation as well as a linear increase in tumor uptake (Walker 256 carcinoma). Due to the structural diversity of potential polymeric carrier systems, further versatile 18F-labeling strategies are needed. Therefore, a prosthetic 18F-labeling approach based on the Cu(I)-catalyzed click reaction was established for HPMA-based polymers, providing incorporation of fluorine-18 under mild conditions and in high yields. On this basis, a preliminary µPET study of a HPMA-based polymer – radiolabeled via the prosthetic group [18F]F-PEG3-N3 – was successfully accomplished. By revealing early pharmacokinetics, 18F-labeling enables to time-efficiently assess the potential of HPMA polymers for efficient drug delivery. Yet, investigating the long-term fate is essential, especially regarding prolonged circulation properties and passive tumor accumulation (EPR effect). Therefore, radiolabeling of diverse HPMA copolymers with the longer-lived isotope iodine-131 was accomplished enabling in vivo evaluation of copolymer P4* over several days. In this study, tumor retention of 131I-P4* could be demonstrated at least over 48h with concurrent blood clearance thereby confirming promising tumor targeting properties of amphiphilic HPMA copolymer systems based on the EPR effect.

Conceptual and normative issues of memory enhancement

Our growing understanding of human mind and cognition and the development of neurotechnology has triggered debate around cognitive enhancement in neuroethics. The dissertation examines the normative issues of memory enhancement, and focuses on two issues: (1) the distinction between memory treatment and enhancement; and (2) how the issue of authenticity concerns memory interventions, including memory treatments and enhancements. rnThe first part consists of a conceptual analysis of the concepts required for normative considerations. First, the representational nature and the function of memory are discussed. Memory is regarded as a special form of self-representation resulting from a constructive processes. Next, the concepts of selfhood, personhood, and identity are examined and a conceptual tool—the autobiographical self-model (ASM)—is introduced. An ASM is a collection of mental representations of the system’s relations with its past and potential future states. Third, the debate between objectivist and constructivist views of health are considered. I argue for a phenomenological account of health, which is based on the primacy of illness and negative utilitarianism.rnThe second part presents a synthesis of the relevant normative issues based on the conceptual tools developed. I argue that memory enhancement can be distinguished from memory treatment using a demarcation regarding the existence of memory-related suffering. That is, memory enhancements are, under standard circumstances and without any unwilling suffering or potential suffering resulting from the alteration of memory functions, interventions that aim to manipulate memory function based on the self-interests of the individual. I then consider the issue of authenticity, namely whether memory intervention or enhancement endangers “one’s true self”. By analyzing two conceptions of authenticity—authenticity as self-discovery and authenticity as self-creation, I propose that authenticity should be understood in terms of the satisfaction of the functional constraints of an ASM—synchronic coherence, diachronic coherence, and global veridicality. This framework provides clearer criteria for considering the relevant concerns and allows us to examine the moral values of authenticity. rn