Gamma-secretase modulators and inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease: influence of genetic background on efficacy and mechanism of action

According to the amyloid hypothesis, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is caused by aberrant production or clearance of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, and in particular of the longer more aggregation-prone Aβ42. The Aβ peptides are generated through successive proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the β-site APP cleaving enzyme (BACE) and γ-secretase. γ-secretase produces Aβ peptides with variable C-termini ranging from Aβ34 to Aβ48, presumably by sequential trimming of longer into shorter peptides. γ-secretase is a multiprotein complex consisting of at least four different proteins and the presenilin proteins (PS1 or PS2) contain the catalytic center of the complex. In 2001 several non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified as the founding members of a new class of γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) that can selectively reduce production of Aβ42. Concomitantly, these GSMs increase Aβ38 production indicating closely coordinated generation of Aβ42 and Aβ38 and a potential precursor-product relationship between these peptides. GSMs seem to exert their activity by direct modulation of γ-secretase. Support for this hypothesis is drawn from the finding that some PS mutations associated with early-onset familial AD (FAD) can modulate the cellular response to GSMs and to γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs), which inhibit production of all Aβ peptides and are known to directly interact with PS. A particularly interesting FAD PS mutation is PS1-ΔExon9, a complex deletion mutant that blocks endoproteolysis of PS1 and renders cells completely non-responsive to GSMs. Studies presented in this thesis show that the diminished response of PS1-ΔExon9 to GSMs is mainly caused by its lack of endoproteolytic cleavage. Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate that a reduced response to GSMs and GSIs is not limited to PS1-ΔExon9 but is a common effect of aggressive FAD-associated PS1 mutations. Surprisingly, we also found that while the Aβ42 response to GSMs is almost completely abolished by these PS1 mutations, the accompanying Aβ38 increase was indistinguishable to wild-type PS1. Finally, the reduced response to GSIs was confirmed in a mouse model with transgenic expression of an aggressive FAD-associated PS1 mutation as a highly potent GSI failed to reduce Aβ42 levels in brain of these mice. Taken together, our findings provide clear evidence for independent generation of Aβ42 and Aβ38 peptides, and argue that the sequential cleavage model might be an oversimplification of the molecular mechanism of γ-secretase. Most importantly, our results highlight the significance of genetic background in drug discovery efforts aimed at γ-secretase, and indicate that the use of cellular models with transgenic expression of FAD-associated PS mutations might confound studies of the potency and efficacy of GSMs and GSIs. Therefore, such models should be strictly avoided in the ongoing preclinical development of these promising and potentially disease-modifying therapeutics for AD.

Safety and therapeutic efficacy of adoptive p53-specific T cell antigen receptor (TCR) gene transfer

Immunotherapy with T cells genetically modified by retroviral transfer of tumor-associated antigen (TAA)-specific T cell receptors (TCR) is a promising approach in targeting cancer. Therefore, using a universal TAA to target different tumor entities by only one therapeutic approach was the main criteria for our TAA-specific TCR. Here, an optimized (opt) αβ-chain p53(264-272)-specific and an opt single chain (sc) p53(264-272)-specific TCR were designed, to reduce mispairing reactions of endogenous and introduced TCR α and TCR β-chains, which might lead to off-target autoimmune reactions, similar to Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). rnIn this study we evaluated the safety issues, which rise by the risk of p53TCR gene transfer-associated on/off-target toxicities as well as the anti-tumor response in vivo in a syngeneic HLA-A*0201 transgenic mouse model. We could successfully demonstrate that opt sc p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells prevent TCR mispairing-mediated lethal off-target autoimmunity in contrast to the parental opt αβ-chain p53-specific TCR. Since the sc p53-specific TCR proofed to be safe, all further studies were performed using sc p53-specific TCR redirected T cells only. Infusion of p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells in Human p53 knock-in (Hupki) mice after lymphodepletion-preconditioning regimen with either sublethal body irradiation (5Gy) or chemotherapy (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) in combination with vaccination (anti-CD40, CpG1668 and p53(257-282) peptide) did not result in a depletion of hematopoietic cells. Moreover, adoptive transfer of high numbers of p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells in combination with Interleukin 2 (IL-2) also did not lead to toxic on-target reactions. The absence of host tissue damage was confirmed by histology and flow cytometry analysis. Furthermore, p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells were able to lyse p53+A2.1+ tumor cells in vitro. However, in vivo studies revealed the potent suppressive effect of the tumor microenvironment (TME) mediated by tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Accordingly, we could improve an insufficient anti-tumor response in vivo after injection of the sc p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells by additional depletion of immunosuppressive cells of the myeloid lineage.rnTogether, these data suggest that the optimized sc p53(264-272)-specific TCR may represent a safe and efficient approach for TCR-based gene therapy. However, combinations of immunotherapeutic strategies are needed to enhance the efficacy of adoptive cell therapy (ACT)-mediated anti-tumor responses.