In vivo and in vitro investigation of the tissue-specific activity of the human CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 promoters

The human cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), the predominant but variably expressed cytochrome P450 in adult liver and small intestine is involved in the metabolism of over 50% of currently used drugs. Its paralog CYP3A5 plays a crucial role in the disposition of several drugs with low therapeutic index, including tacrolimus. Limited information is available for the CYP3A5 transcriptional regulation and its induction by xenobiotics remains controversial. In the first part of this study, we analysed the CYP3A5 transcriptional regulation and its induction by xenobiotics in vivo using transgenic mice. To this end, two transgenic strains were established by pronuclear injection of a plasmid, expressing firefly luciferase driven by a 6.2 kb of the human CYP3A5 promoter. A detailed analysis of both strains shows a tissue distribution largely reflecting that of CYP3A5 transcripts in humans. Thus, the highest luciferase activity was detected in the small intestine, followed by oesophagus, testis, lung, adrenal gland, ovary, prostate and kidney. However, no activity was observed in the liver. CYP3A5-luc transgenic mice were similarly induced in both sexes with either PCN or TCPOBOP in small intestine in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, the 6.2 kb upstream promoter of CYP3A5 mediates the broad tissue activity in transgenic mice. CYP3A5 promoter is inducible in the small intestine in vivo, which may contribute to the variable expression of CYP3A in this organ. rnThe hepato-intestinal level of the detoxifying oxidases CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 is adjusted to the xenobiotic exposure mainly via the xenosensor and transcriptional factor PXR. CYP3A5 is additionally expressed in several other organs lacking PXR, including kidney. In the second part of this study, we investigated the mechanism of the differential expression of CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 and its evolutionary origin using renal and intestinal cells, and comparative genomics. For this examination, we established a two-cell line models reflecting the expression relationships of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in the kidney and small intestine in vivo. Our data demonstrate that the CYP3A5 expression in renal cells was enabled by the loss of a suppressing Yin Yang 1 (YY1)-binding site from the CYP3A5 promoter. This allowed for a renal CYP3A5 expression in a PXR-independent manner. The YY1 element is retained in the CYP3A4 gene, leading to its suppression, perhaps via interference with the NF1 activity in renal cells. In intestinal cells, the inhibition of CYP3A4 expression by YY1 is abrogated by a combined activating effect of PXR and NF1 acting on their respective response elements located adjacent to the YY1-binding site on CYP3A4 proximal promoter. CYP3A4 expression is further facilitated by a point mutation attenuating the suppressing effect of YY1 binding site. The differential expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in these organs results from the loss of the YY1 binding element from the CYP3A5 promoter, acting in concert with the differential organ expression of PXR, and with the higher accumulation of PXR response elements in CYP3A4. rn

Consequences of DNA damage for gene transcription : direct effects of modified nucleobases and the role of base excision repair = Folgen von DNA-Schäden für die Gentranskription

The presence of damaged nucleobases in DNA can negatively influence transcription of genes. One of the mechanisms by which DNA damage interferes with reading of genetic information is a direct blockage of the elongating RNA polymerase complexes – an effect well described for bulky adducts induced by several chemical substances and UV-irradiation. However, other mechanisms must exist as well because many of the endogenously occurring non-bulky DNA base modifications have transcription-inhibitory properties in cells, whilstrnnot constituting a roadblock for RNA polymerases under cell free conditions. The inhibition of transcription by non-blocking DNA damage was investigated in this work by employing the reporter gene-based assays. Comparison between various types of DNA damage (UV-induced pyrimidine photoproducts, oxidative purine modifications induced by photosensitisation, defined synthetic modified bases such as 8-oxoguanine and uracil, and sequence-specific single-strand breaks) showed that distinct mechanisms of inhibition of transcription can be engaged, and that DNA repair can influence transcription of the affectedrngenes in several different ways.rnQuantitative expression analyses of reporter genes damaged either by the exposure of cells to UV or delivered into cells by transient transfection supported the earlier evidence that transcription arrest at the damage sites is the major mechanism for the inhibition of transcription by this kind of DNA lesions and that recovery of transcription requires a functional nucleotide excision repair gene Csb (ERCC6) in mouse cells. In contrast, oxidisedrnpurines generated by photosensitisation do not cause transcriptional blockage by a direct mechanism, but rather lead to transcriptional repression of the damaged gene which is associated with altered histone acetylation in the promoter region. The whole chain of events leading to transcriptional silencing in response to DNA damage remains to be uncovered. Yet, the data presented here identify repair-induced single-strand breaks – which arise from excision of damaged bases by the DNA repair glycosylases or endonucleases – as arnputative initiatory factor in this process. Such an indirect mechanism was supported by requirement of the 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) for the inhibition of transcription by synthetic 8-oxodG incorporated into a reporter gene and by the delays observed for the inhibition of transcription caused by structurally unrelated base modifications (8-oxoguanine and uracil). It is thereby hypothesized that excision of the modified bases could be a generalrnmechanism for inhibition of transcription by DNA damage which is processed by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Further gene expression analyses of plasmids containing single-strand breaks or abasic sites in the transcribed sequences revealed strong transcription inhibitory potentials of these lesions, in agreement with the presumption that BER intermediates are largely responsible for the observed effects. Experiments with synthetic base modifications positioned within the defined DNA sequences showed thatrninhibition of transcription did not require the localisation of the lesion in the transcribed DNA strand; therefore the damage sensing mechanism has to be different from the direct encounters of transcribing RNA polymerase complexes with DNA damage.rnAltogether, this work provides new evidence that processing of various DNA basernmodifications by BER can perturb transcription of damaged genes by triggering a gene silencing mechanism. As gene expression can be influenced even by a single DNA damage event, this mechanism could have relevance for the endogenous DNA damage induced in cells under normal physiological conditions, with a possible link to gene silencing in general.

Safety and therapeutic efficacy of adoptive p53-specific T cell antigen receptor (TCR) gene transfer

Immunotherapy with T cells genetically modified by retroviral transfer of tumor-associated antigen (TAA)-specific T cell receptors (TCR) is a promising approach in targeting cancer. Therefore, using a universal TAA to target different tumor entities by only one therapeutic approach was the main criteria for our TAA-specific TCR. Here, an optimized (opt) αβ-chain p53(264-272)-specific and an opt single chain (sc) p53(264-272)-specific TCR were designed, to reduce mispairing reactions of endogenous and introduced TCR α and TCR β-chains, which might lead to off-target autoimmune reactions, similar to Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). rnIn this study we evaluated the safety issues, which rise by the risk of p53TCR gene transfer-associated on/off-target toxicities as well as the anti-tumor response in vivo in a syngeneic HLA-A*0201 transgenic mouse model. We could successfully demonstrate that opt sc p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells prevent TCR mispairing-mediated lethal off-target autoimmunity in contrast to the parental opt αβ-chain p53-specific TCR. Since the sc p53-specific TCR proofed to be safe, all further studies were performed using sc p53-specific TCR redirected T cells only. Infusion of p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells in Human p53 knock-in (Hupki) mice after lymphodepletion-preconditioning regimen with either sublethal body irradiation (5Gy) or chemotherapy (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) in combination with vaccination (anti-CD40, CpG1668 and p53(257-282) peptide) did not result in a depletion of hematopoietic cells. Moreover, adoptive transfer of high numbers of p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells in combination with Interleukin 2 (IL-2) also did not lead to toxic on-target reactions. The absence of host tissue damage was confirmed by histology and flow cytometry analysis. Furthermore, p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells were able to lyse p53+A2.1+ tumor cells in vitro. However, in vivo studies revealed the potent suppressive effect of the tumor microenvironment (TME) mediated by tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Accordingly, we could improve an insufficient anti-tumor response in vivo after injection of the sc p53-specific TCR-redirected T cells by additional depletion of immunosuppressive cells of the myeloid lineage.rnTogether, these data suggest that the optimized sc p53(264-272)-specific TCR may represent a safe and efficient approach for TCR-based gene therapy. However, combinations of immunotherapeutic strategies are needed to enhance the efficacy of adoptive cell therapy (ACT)-mediated anti-tumor responses.