Mechanistic study of cell death induction by O 6-methylating agents, focusing on the role of homologous recombination as a molecular target for sensitization of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic alkylating agents

Chemotherapeutic SN1‑methylating agents are important anticancer drugs. They induce several covalent modifications in the DNA, from which O6‑methylguanine (O6MeG) is the main toxic lesion. In this work, different hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the mechanism of O6MeG‑triggered cell death were tested. The results of this work support the abortive processing model, which states that abortive post‑replicative processing of O6MeG‑driven mispairs by the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) machinery results in single‑strand gaps in the DNA that, upon a 2nd round of DNA replication, leads to DNA double‑strand break (DSB) formation, checkpoint activation and cell death. In this work, it was shown that O6MeG induces an accumulation of cells in the 2nd G2/M‑phase after treatment. This was accompanied by an increase in DSB formation in the 2nd S/G2/M‑phase, and paralleled by activation of the checkpoint kinases ATR and CHK1. Apoptosis was activated in the 2nd cell cycle. A portion of cells continue proliferating past the 2nd cell cycle, and triggers apoptosis in the subsequent generations. An extension to the original model is proposed, where the persistence of O6MeG in the DNA causes new abortive MMR processing in the 2nd and subsequent generations, where new DSB are produced triggering cell death. Interestingly, removal of O6MeG beyond the 2nd generation lead to a significant, but not complete, reduction in apoptosis, pointing to the involvement of additional mechanisms as a cause of apoptosis. We therefore propose that an increase in genomic instability resulting from accumulation of mis‑repaired DNA damage plays a role in cell death induction. Given the central role of DSB formation in toxicity triggered by chemotherapeutic SN1‑alkylating agents, it was aimed in the second part of this thesis to determine whether inhibition of DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR) or non‑homologous end joining (NHEJ) is a reasonable strategy for sensitizing glioblastoma cells to these agents. The results of this work show that HR down‑regulation in glioblastoma cells impairs the repair of temozolomide (TMZ)‑induced DSB. HR down‑regulation greatly sensitizes cells to cell death following O6‑methylating (TMZ) or O6‑chlorethylating (nimustine) treatment, but not following ionizing radiation. The RNAi mediated inhibition in DSB repair and chemo‑sensitization was proportional to the knockdown of the HR protein RAD51. Chemo‑sensitization was demonstrated for several HR proteins, in glioma cell lines proficient and mutated in p53. Evidence is provided showing that O6MeG is the primary lesion responsible for the increased sensitivity of glioblastoma cells following TMZ treatment, and that inhibition of the resistance marker MGMT restores the chemo‑sensitization achieved by HR down‑regulation. Data are also provided to show that inhibition of DNA‑PK dependent NHEJ does not significantly sensitized glioblastoma cells to TMZ treatment. Finally, the data also show that PARP inhibition with olaparib additionally sensitized HR down‑regulated glioma cells to TMZ. Collectively, the data show that processing of O6MeG through two rounds of DNA replication is required for DSB formation, checkpoint activation and apoptosis induction, and that O6MeG‑triggered apoptosis is also executed in subsequent generations. Furthermore, the data provide proof of principle evidence that down‑regulation of HR is a reasonable strategy for sensitizing glioma cells to killing by O6‑alkylating chemotherapeutics.

Development of a highly potent bispecific antibody format targeting the novel tumor-specific antigen CLDN18.2

Due to multiple immune evasion mechanisms of cancer cells, novel therapy approaches are required to overcome the limitations of existing immunotherapies. Bispecific antibodies are potent anti-cancer drugs, which redirect effector T cells for specific tumor cell lysis, thus enabling the patient’s immune system to fight cancer cells. The antibody format used in this proof of concept study–bispecific ideal monoclonal antibodies termed BiMAB–is a tailor-made recombinant protein, which consists of two fused scFv antibodies recognizing different antigens. Both are arranged in tandem on a single peptide chain and the individual variable binding domains are separated by special non-immunogenic linkers. The format is comprised of a scFv targeting CLDN18.2–a gastric cancer tumor associated antigen (TAA) –while the second specificity binds the CD3 epsilon (CD3ε) subunit of the T cell receptor (TCR) on T cells. For the first time, we compared in our IMAB362-based BiMAB setting, four different anti-CD3-scFvs, respectively derived from the mAbs TR66, CLB-T3, as well as the humanized and the murine variant of UCHT1. In addition, we investigated the impact of an N- versus a C-terminal location of the IMAB362-derived scFv and the anti-CD3-scFvs. Thus, nine CLDN18.2 specific BiMAB proteins were generated, of which all showed a remarkably high cytotoxicity towards CLDN18.2-positive tumor cells. Because of its promising effectiveness, 1BiMAB emerged as the BiMAB prototype. The selectivity of 1BiMAB for its TAA and CD3ε, with affinities in the nanomolar range, has been confirmed by in vitro assays. Its dual binding depends on the design of an N-terminally positioned IMAB362 scFv and the consecutive C-terminally positioned TR66 scFv. 1BiMAB provoked a concentration and target cell dependent T cell activation, proliferation, and upregulation of the cytolytic protein Granzyme B, as well as the consequent elimination of target cells. Our results demonstrate that 1BiMAB is able to activate T cells independent of elements that are usually involved in the T cell recognition program, like antigen presentation, MHC restriction, and co-stimulatory effector molecules. In the first in vivo studies using a subcutaneous xenogeneic tumor mouse model in immune incompetent NSG mice, we could prove a significant therapeutic effect of 1BiMAB with partial or complete tumor elimination. The initial in vitro RIBOMAB experiments correspondingly showed encouraging results. The electroporation of 1BiMAB IVT-RNA into target or effector cells was feasible, while the functionality of translated 1BiMAB was proven by induced T cell activation and target cell lysis. Accordingly, we could show that the in vitro RIBOMAB approach was applicable for all nine BiMABs, which proves the RIBOMAB concept. Thus, the CLDN18.2-BiMAB strategy offers great potential for the treatment of cancer. In the future, administered either as protein or as IVT-RNA, the BiMAB format will contribute towards finding solutions to raise and sustain tumor-specific cellular responses elicited by engaged and activated endogenous T cells. This will potentially enable us to overcome immune evasion mechanisms of tumor cells, consequently supporting current solid gastric cancer therapies.