The importance of visual and olfactory stimuli during flower visits in Apis mellifera

Flowers attract honeybees using colour and scent signals. Bimodality (having both scent and colour) in flowers leads to increased visitation rates, but how the signals influence each other in a foraging situation is still quite controversial. We studied four basic questions: When faced with conflicting scent and colour information, will bees choose by scent and ignore the “wrong” colour, or vice versa? To get to the bottom of this question, we trained bees on scent-colour combination AX (rewarded) versus BY (unrewarded) and tested them on AY (previously rewarded colour and unrewarded scent) versus BX (previously rewarded scent and unrewarded colour). It turned out that the result depends on stimulus quality: if the colours are very similar (unsaturated blue and blue-green), bees choose by scent. If they are very different (saturated blue and yellow), bees choose by colour. We used the same scents, lavender and rosemary, in both cases. Our second question was: Are individual bees hardwired to use colour and ignore scent (or vice versa), or can this behaviour be modified, depending on which cue is more readily available in the current foraging context? To study this question, we picked colour-preferring bees and gave them extra training on scent-only stimuli. Afterwards, we tested if their preference had changed, and if they still remembered the scent stimulus they had originally used as their main cue. We came to the conclusion that a colour preference can be reversed through scent-only training. We also gave scent-preferring bees extra training on colour-only stimuli, and tested for a change in their preference. The number of animals tested was too small for statistical tests (n = 4), but a common tendency suggested that colour-only training leads to a preference for colour. A preference to forage by a certain sensory modality therefore appears to be not fixed but flexible, and adapted to the bee’s surroundings. Our third question was: Do bees learn bimodal stimuli as the sum of their parts (elemental learning), or as a new stimulus which is different from the sum of the components’ parts (configural learning)? We trained bees on bimodal stimuli, then tested them on the colour components only, and the scent components only. We performed this experiment with a similar colour set (unsaturated blue and blue-green, as above), and a very different colour set (saturated blue and yellow), but used lavender and rosemary for scent stimuli in both cases. Our experiment yielded unexpected results: with the different colours, the results were best explained by elemental learning, but with the similar colour set, bees exhibited configural learning. Still, their memory of the bimodal compound was excellent. Finally, we looked at reverse-learning. We reverse-trained bees with bimodal stimuli to find out whether bimodality leads to better reverse-learning compared to monomodal stimuli. We trained bees on AX (rewarded) versus BY (unrewarded), then on AX (unrewarded) versus BY (rewarded), and finally on AX (rewarded) and BY (unrewarded) again. We performed this experiment with both colour sets, always using the same two scents (lavender and rosemary). It turned out that bimodality does not help bees “see the pattern” and anticipate the switch. Generally, bees trained on the different colour set performed better than bees trained on the similar colour set, indicating that stimulus salience influences reverse-learning.

Proteomic analysis of ocular surface components by use of HPLC based mass spectrometric strategies

In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde eine Top Down (TD) und zwei Bottom Up (BU) MALDI/ESI Massenspektrometrie/HPLC-Methoden entwickelt mit dem Ziel Augenoberfächenkomponenten, d.h. Tränenfilm und Konjunktivalzellen zu analysieren. Dabei wurde ein detaillierter Einblick in die Entwicklungsschritte gegeben und die Ansätze auf Eignung und methodische Grenzen untersucht. Während der TD Ansatz vorwiegend Eignung zur Analyse von rohen, weitgehend unbearbeiteten Zellproben fand, konnten mittels des BU Ansatzes bearbeitete konjunktivale Zellen, aber auch Tränenfilm mit hoher Sensitivität und Genauigkeit proteomisch analysiert werden. Dabei konnten mittels LC MALDI BU-Methode mehr als 200 Tränenproteine und mittels der LC ESI Methode mehr als 1000 Tränen- sowie konjunktivale Zellproteine gelistet werden. Dabei unterschieden sich ESI- and MALDI- Methoden deutlich bezüglich der Quantität und Qualität der Ergebnisse, weshalb differente proteomische Anwendungsgebiete der beiden Methoden vorgeschlagen wurden. Weiterhin konnten mittels der entwickelten LC MALDI/ESI BU Plattform, basierend auf den Vorteilen gegenüber dem TD Ansatz, therapeutische Einflüsse auf die Augenoberfläche mit Fokus auf die topische Anwendung von Taurin sowie Taflotan® sine, untersucht werden. Für Taurin konnten entzündungshemmende Effekte, belegt durch dynamische Veränderungen des Tränenfilms, dokumentiert werden. Außerdem konnten vorteilhafte, konzentrationsabhängige Wirkweisen auch in Studien an konjunktival Zellen gezeigt werden. Für die Anwendung von konservierungsmittelfreien Taflotan® sine, konnte mittels LC ESI BU Analyse eine Regenerierung der Augenoberfläche in Patienten mit Primärem Offenwinkel Glaukom (POWG), welche unter einem “Trockenem Auge“ litten nach einem therapeutischen Wechsel von Xalatan® basierend auf dynamischen Tränenproteomveränderungen gezeigt werden. Die Ergebnisse konnten mittels Microarray (MA) Analysen bestätigt werden. Sowohl in den Taurin Studien, als auch in der Taflotan® sine Studie, konnten charakteristische Proteine der Augenoberfläche dokumentiert werden, welche eine objektive Bewertung des Gesundheitszustandes der Augenoberfläche ermöglichen. Eine Kombination von Taflotan® sine und Taurin wurde als mögliche Strategie zur Therapie des Trockenen Auges bei POWG Patienten vorgeschlagen und diskutiert.

Monte Carlo simulations of nucleation of colloidal crystals

A crystal nucleus in a finite volume may exhibit phase coexistence with a surrounding fluid. The thermodynamic properties of the coexisting fluid (pressure and chemical potential) are enhanced relative to their coexistence values. This enhancement is uniquely related to the surface excess free energy. rnA model for weakly attractive soft colloidal particles is investigated, the so called Asakura-Oosawa model. In simulations, this model allows for the calculation of the pressure in the liquid using the virial formula directly. The phase coexistence pressure in the thermodynamic limit is obtained from the interface velocity method. We introduce a method by which the chemical potential in dense liquids can be measured. There is neither a need to locate the interface nor to compute the anisotropic interfacial tension to obtain nucleation barriers. Therefore, our analysis is appropriate for nuclei of arbitrary shape. Monte Carlo simulations over a wide range of nucleus volumes yield to nucleation barriers independent from the total system volume. The interfacial tension is determined via the ensemble-switch method, hence a detailed test of classical nucleation theory is possible. The anisotropy of the interfacial tension and the resulting non-spherical shape has only a minor effect on the barrier for the Asakura-Oosawa model.