Involvement and detachment in David Cameron and Ed Miliband’s political discourse. An analysis of deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ in UK 2015 General Election news interviews

The goal of my study is to investigate the relationship between selected deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ and the involvement/detachment dichotomy in a sample of television news interviews. I focus on the use of personal pronouns in political discourse. Drawing upon Caffi’s (2007) classification of mitigating devices into bushes, hedges and shields, I focus on deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’: I examine the way a selection of ‘I’-related deictic shields is employed in a collection of news interviews broadcast during the electoral campaign prior to the UK 2015 General Election. My purpose is to uncover the frequencies of each of the linguistic items selected and the pragmatic functions of those linguistic items in the involvement/detachment dichotomy. The research is structured as follows. Chapter 1 provides an account of previous studies on the three main areas of research: speech event analysis, institutional interaction and the news interview, and the UK 2015 General Election television programmes. Chapter 2 is centred on the involvement/detachment dichotomy: I provide an overview of nonlinguistic and linguistic features of involvement and detachment at all levels of sentence structure. Chapter 3 contains a detailed account of the data collection and data analysis process. Chapter 4 provides an accurate description of results in three steps: quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis and discussion of the pragmatic functions of the selected linguistic features of involvement and detachment. Chapter 5 includes a brief summary of the investigation, reviews the main findings, and indicates limitations of the study and possible inputs for further research. The results of the analysis confirm that, while some of the linguistic items examined point toward involvement, others have a detaching effect. I therefore conclude that deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ permit the realisation of the involvement/detachment dichotomy in the speech genre of the news interview.

Tree regularized neural networks for key point analysis

This thesis contributes to the ArgMining 2021 shared task on Key Point Analysis. Key Point Analysis entails extracting and calculating the prevalence of a concise list of the most prominent talking points, from an input corpus. These talking points are usually referred to as key points. Key point analysis is divided into two subtasks: Key Point Matching, which involves assigning a matching score to each key point/argument pair, and Key Point Generation, which consists of the generation of key points. The task of Key Point Matching was approached using different models: a pretrained Sentence Transformers model and a tree-constrained Graph Neural Network were tested. The best model was the fine-tuned Sentence Transformers, which achieved a mean Average Precision score of 0.75, ranking 12 compared to other participating teams. The model was then used for the subtask of Key Point Generation using the extractive method in the selection of key point candidates and the model developed for the previous subtask to evaluate them.