Non linear response of planar asymmetric systems

The seismic behaviour of one-storey asymmetric structures has been studied since 1970s by a number of researches studies which identified the coupled nature of the translational-to-torsional response of those class of systems leading to severe displacement magnifications at the perimeter frames and therefore to significant increase of local peak seismic demand to the structural elements with respect to those of equivalent not-eccentric systems (Kan and Chopra 1987). These studies identified the fundamental parameters (such as the fundamental period TL normalized eccentricity e and the torsional-to-lateral frequency ratio Ωϑ) governing the torsional behavior of in-plan asymmetric structures and trends of behavior. It has been clearly recognized that asymmetric structures characterized by Ωϑ >1, referred to as torsionally-stiff systems, behave quite different form structures with Ωϑ <1, referred to as torsionally-flexible systems. Previous research works by some of the authors proposed a simple closed-form estimation of the maximum torsional response of one-storey elastic systems (Trombetti et al. 2005 and Palermo et al. 2010) leading to the so called “Alpha-method” for the evaluation of the displacement magnification factors at the corner sides. The present paper provides an upgrade of the “Alpha Method” removing the assumption of linear elastic response of the system. The main objective is to evaluate how the excursion of the structural elements in the inelastic field (due to the reaching of yield strength) affects the displacement demand of one-storey in-plan asymmetric structures. The system proposed by Chopra and Goel in 2007, which is claimed to be able to capture the main features of the non-linear response of in-plan asymmetric system, is used to perform a large parametric analysis varying all the fundamental parameters of the system, including the inelastic demand by varying the force reduction factor from 2 to 5. Magnification factors for different force reduction factor are proposed and comparisons with the results obtained from linear analysis are provided.

Bond behaviour and kb factor in GFRP rebars casted in concrete

A proper bond between reinforcement and concrete is key for an appropriate composite action of both materials in reinforced concrete structures. However, to-date limited studies exist on bond of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars in concrete members under flexure. In this paper, the bond strength developed by FRP and steel rebars is evaluated and compared, by testing reinforced concrete beams under three point bending load. The investigation included several beams that were 183 cm long × 15 cm wide × 36 cm deep: many of them were reinforced with sand coated GFRP rebars, while steel was used to reinforce the remaining ones. For each of the reinforcing systems, various different embedded lengths were tested. The beams were tested under a 3-point-bending setup and they were monitored using several measuring devices: LVDTS, potentiometers and strain gauges. Preliminary results show that the GFRP rebars have lower bond capacity than the ones made of steel. Moreover, it was inferred that the embedded lengths suggested by actual code provisions for GFRP rebars are too conservative.