1 resultado para democratic knowledge processes
em AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (55)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (84)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (26)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (21)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (3)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (43)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Ecology and Society (3)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (92)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (63)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (7)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (28)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (25)
- Repositório de Administração Pública (REPAP) - Direção-Geral da Qualificação dos Trabalhadores em Funções Públicas (INA), Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (13)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (38)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (24)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (8)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (11)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (183)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
Resumo:
Group work allows participants to pool their thoughts and examine difficulties from several angles. In these settings, it is possible to attempt things that an individual could not achieve, combining a variety of abilities and knowledge to tackle more complicated and large-scale challenges. That’s why nowadays collaborative work is becoming more and more widespread to solve complex innovation dilemmas. Since innovation isn’t a tangible thing, most innovation teams used to take decisions based on performance KPIs such as forecasted engagement, projected profitability, investments required, cultural impacts etc. Have you ever wondered the reason why sometimes innovation group processes come out with decisions which are not the optimal meeting point of all the KPIs? Has this decision been influenced by other factors? Some researchers account part of this phenomenon to the emotions in group-based interaction between participants. I will develop a literature review that is split into three parts: first, I will consider some emotions theories from an individual perspective; secondly, a wider view of collective interactions theories will be provided; lastly, I will supply some recent collective interaction empirical studies. After the theoretical and empirical gaps have been tackled, the study will additionally move forward with a methodological point of view, about the Circumplex Model, which is the model I used to evaluate emotions in my research. This model has been applied to SUGAR project, which is the biggest design thinking academy worldwide.