Extending the 2P-Kt ecosystem: CLP and Labelled LP

The ability to create hybrid systems that blend different paradigms has now become a requirement for complex AI systems usually made of more than a component. In this way, it is possible to exploit the advantages of each paradigm and exploit the potential of different approaches such as symbolic and non-symbolic approaches. In particular, symbolic approaches are often exploited for their efficiency, effectiveness and ability to manage large amounts of data, while symbolic approaches are exploited to ensure aspects related to explainability, fairness, and trustworthiness in general. The thesis lies in this context, in particular in the design and development of symbolic technologies that can be easily integrated and interoperable with other AI technologies. 2P-Kt is a symbolic ecosystem developed for this purpose, it provides a logic-programming (LP) engine which can be easily extended and customized to deal with specific needs. The aim of this thesis is to extend 2P-Kt to support constraint logic programming (CLP) as one of the main paradigms for solving highly combinatorial problems given a declarative problem description and a general constraint-propagation engine. A real case study concerning school timetabling is described to show a practical usage of the CLP(FD) library implemented. Since CLP represents only a particular scenario for extending LP to domain-specific scenarios, in this thesis we present also a more general framework: Labelled Prolog, extending LP with labelled terms and in particular labelled variables. The designed framework shows how it is possible to frame all variations and extensions of LP under a single language reducing the huge amount of existing languages and libraries and focusing more on how to manage different domain needs using labels which can be associated with every kind of term. Mapping of CLP into Labeled Prolog is also discussed as well as the benefits of the provided approach.

Un approccio per la disambiguazione di autori di articoli scientifici: algoritmo e implementazione

Dalla necessità di risolvere il problema della disambiguazione di un insieme di autori messo a disposizione dall'Università di Bologna, il Semantic Lancet, è nata l'idea di progettare un algoritmo di disambiguazione in grado di adattarsi, in caso di bisogno, a qualsiasi tipo di lista di autori. Per la fase di testing dell'algoritmo è stato utilizzato un dataset generato (11724 autori di cui 1295 coppie da disambiguare) dalle informazioni disponibili dal "database systems and logic programming" (DBLP), in modo da essere il più etereogeneo possibile, cioè da contenere il maggior numero di casi di disambiguazione possibile. Per i primi test di sbarramento è stato definito un algoritmo alternativo discusso nella sezione 4.3 ottenendo una misura di esattezza dell'1% ed una di completezza dell'81%. L'algoritmo proposto impostato con il modello di configurazione ha ottenuto invece una misura di esattezza dell'81% ed una di completezza del 70%, test discusso nella sezione 4.4. Successivamente l'algoritmo è stato testato anche su un altro dataset: Semantic Lancet (919 autori di cui 34 coppie da disambiguare), ottenendo, grazie alle dovute variazioni del file di configurazione, una misura di esattezza del 84% e una di completezza del 79%, discusso nella sezione 4.5.

Applying the reactive programming paradigm: Toward a more declarative application development approach

After almost 10 years from “The Free Lunch Is Over” article, where the need to parallelize programs started to be a real and mainstream issue, a lot of stuffs did happened: • Processor manufacturers are reaching the physical limits with most of their approaches to boosting CPU performance, and are instead turning to hyperthreading and multicore architectures; • Applications are increasingly need to support concurrency; • Programming languages and systems are increasingly forced to deal well with concurrency. This thesis is an attempt to propose an overview of a paradigm that aims to properly abstract the problem of propagating data changes: Reactive Programming (RP). This paradigm proposes an asynchronous non-blocking approach to concurrency and computations, abstracting from the low-level concurrency mechanisms.

Implementation of a non ground meta interpreter for defeasible logic

Human reasoning is a fascinating and complex cognitive process that can be applied in different research areas such as philosophy, psychology, laws and financial. Unfortunately, developing supporting software (to those different areas) able to cope such as complex reasoning it’s difficult and requires a suitable logic abstract formalism. In this thesis we aim to develop a program, that has the job to evaluate a theory (a set of rules) w.r.t. a Goal, and provide some results such as “The Goal is derivable from the KB5 (of the theory)”. In order to achieve this goal we need to analyse different logics and choose the one that best meets our needs. In logic, usually, we try to determine if a given conclusion is logically implied by a set of assumptions T (theory). However, when we deal with programming logic we need an efficient algorithm in order to find such implications. In this work we use a logic rather similar to human logic. Indeed, human reasoning requires an extension of the first order logic able to reach a conclusion depending on not definitely true6 premises belonging to a incomplete set of knowledge. Thus, we implemented a defeasible logic7 framework able to manipulate defeasible rules. Defeasible logic is a non-monotonic logic designed for efficient defeasible reasoning by Nute (see Chapter 2). Those kind of applications are useful in laws area especially if they offer an implementation of an argumentation framework that provides a formal modelling of game. Roughly speaking, let the theory is the set of laws, a keyclaim is the conclusion that one of the party wants to prove (and the other one wants to defeat) and adding dynamic assertion of rules, namely, facts putted forward by the parties, then, we can play an argumentative challenge between two players and decide if the conclusion is provable or not depending on the different strategies performed by the players. Implementing a game model requires one more meta-interpreter able to evaluate the defeasible logic framework; indeed, according to Göedel theorem (see on page 127), we cannot evaluate the meaning of a language using the tools provided by the language itself, but we need a meta-language able to manipulate the object language8. Thus, rather than a simple meta-interpreter, we propose a Meta-level containing different Meta-evaluators. The former has been explained above, the second one is needed to perform the game model, and the last one will be used to change game execution and tree derivation strategies.