Involvement and detachment in David Cameron and Ed Miliband’s political discourse. An analysis of deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ in UK 2015 General Election news interviews

The goal of my study is to investigate the relationship between selected deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ and the involvement/detachment dichotomy in a sample of television news interviews. I focus on the use of personal pronouns in political discourse. Drawing upon Caffi’s (2007) classification of mitigating devices into bushes, hedges and shields, I focus on deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’: I examine the way a selection of ‘I’-related deictic shields is employed in a collection of news interviews broadcast during the electoral campaign prior to the UK 2015 General Election. My purpose is to uncover the frequencies of each of the linguistic items selected and the pragmatic functions of those linguistic items in the involvement/detachment dichotomy. The research is structured as follows. Chapter 1 provides an account of previous studies on the three main areas of research: speech event analysis, institutional interaction and the news interview, and the UK 2015 General Election television programmes. Chapter 2 is centred on the involvement/detachment dichotomy: I provide an overview of nonlinguistic and linguistic features of involvement and detachment at all levels of sentence structure. Chapter 3 contains a detailed account of the data collection and data analysis process. Chapter 4 provides an accurate description of results in three steps: quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis and discussion of the pragmatic functions of the selected linguistic features of involvement and detachment. Chapter 5 includes a brief summary of the investigation, reviews the main findings, and indicates limitations of the study and possible inputs for further research. The results of the analysis confirm that, while some of the linguistic items examined point toward involvement, others have a detaching effect. I therefore conclude that deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ permit the realisation of the involvement/detachment dichotomy in the speech genre of the news interview.

A comparison between vertical mixing parameterizations in the Levantine Sea

The goal of this thesis was the study of an optimal vertical mixing parameterization scheme in a mesoscale dominated field characterized from a strong vorticity and the presence of a layer of colder, less saline water at about 100 m depth (Atlantic Waters); in these conditions we compared six different experiments, that differ by the turbulent closure schemes, the presence or not of an enhanced diffusion parameterization and the presence or not of a double diffusion mixing parameterization. To evaluate the performance of the experiments and the model we compared the simulations with the ARGO observations of temperature and salinity available in our domain, in our period of interest. The conclusions were the following: • the increase of the resolution gives better results in terms of temperature in all the considered cases, and in terms of salinity. • The comparisons between the Pacanovski-Philander and the TKE turbulent closure schemes don’t show significant differences when the simulations are compared to the observations. • The removing of the enhanced diffusion parameterization in presence of the TKE turbulent closure submodel doesn’t give positive results, and show limitations in the resolving of gravitational instabilities near the surface • The k-ϵ turbulent closure model utilized in all the GLS experiments, is the best performing closure model among the three considered, with positive results in all the salinity comparison with the in situ observation and in most of the temperature comparisons. • The double mixing parameterization utilized in the k-ϵ closure submodel improves the results of the experiments improving both the temperature and salinity in comparison with the ARGO data.