Patent translation with CAT tools and Machine Translation

The aim of this essay, which focuses on patent translation, is to compare the use of Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) and Machine Translation (MT). During my curricular internship at a specialized-translation agency called Centro Traduzioni Imolese, I was able to practice patent translation thanks to CAT tools like SDL Trados Studio, something I have never studied at university in Forlì. Nowadays, however, Machine Translation is widely used in patent translation as well, due to the vast number of technical terms and their repetitiveness in patents, so the machine can translate automatically and rapidly all repeated terms with the same word, thanks to the use of corpora and translation memories linked to the patent field. In the first chapter I will give a definition of what a patent is, and I will introduce the concept of patent literature; afterwards, I will illustrate the differences between Computer-Assisted Translation and Machine Translation used in patent translation. In the second chapter I will translate two portions of patent 102019000018530, via the Matecat online application, translating the first part with CAT and the second part with MT, then doing the same for the second portion selected from the patent. Finally, in the third chapter, I will analyse the two translations, comparing the results in order to discover which is the more efficient method for translating patents.

Methods for monitoring Machine Learning models

The following thesis aims to investigate the issues concerning the maintenance of a Machine Learning model over time, both about the versioning of the model itself and the data on which it is trained and about data monitoring tools and their distribution. The themes of Data Drift and Concept Drift were then explored and the performance of some of the most popular techniques in the field of Anomaly detection, such as VAE, PCA, and Monte Carlo Dropout, were evaluated.