Wind analysis of the Messina Strait Bridge design project proposal with stabilizing cables

A new study on suspension bridges has been prompted by the big disaster of the Tacoma Narrow Bridge at half its design speed. The aerodynamic instability of long-span bridges has been studied using wind tunnel tests. As a result of improved aerodynamic performance from the geometrical configuration of the bridge deck, the aerodynamic criteria for suspension and cable-stayed bridges have become well established in recent years, thereby allowing longer bridge spans to be developed. Although the Messina Strait Bridge has yet to be constructed, we are looking forward to evaluating the impact of different deck cross-sections on both aerodynamic stability and cost reduction. To further improve the aerodynamic characteristics of long-span suspension bridges, an optimized multi-box bridge deck model with two side decks for traffic lanes, two middle railway decks, and three gaps separating them has been proposed aerodynamic performance has been experimentally verified. 1:80 scale wind tunnel tests have been conducted. According to the current MIDAS Model, the first torsional and the first vertical frequency ratios are 1.27787 and 1.36[1] respectively. It is the torsional/vertical frequency ratio, combined with the deck aerodynamic properties, that determines the wind response properties of the bridge for the most dangerous possible form of aeroelastic instability. The classic flutter is caused by the coupling of torsional and vertical modes. Stabilizing cables to the deck could be a solution to this classic flutter by reducing lateral displacement of the deck and increasing frequency ratios. Stabilizing cables will be installed on the deck in three different orientations: vertical, inclined, and horizontal, with diameters of 80 cm, 60 cm, and 40 cm in each orientation respectively. An overview of the research undertaken on this topic will be presented, as well as the most important findings.

Numerical prediction of the lateral displacement capacity of flexural reinforced concrete shear walls

Previous earthquakes showed that shear wall damage could lead to catastrophic failures of the reinforced concrete building. The lateral load capacity of shear walls needs to be estimated to minimize associated losses during catastrophic events; hence it is necessary to develop and validate reliable and stable numerical methods able to converge to reasonable estimations with minimum computational effort. The beam-column 1-D line element with fiber-type cross-section model is a practical option that yields results in agreement with experimental data. However, shortcomings of using this model to predict the local damage response may come from the fact that the model requires fine calibration of material properties to overcome regularization and size effects. To reduce the mesh-dependency of the numerical model, a regularization method based on the concept of post-yield energy is applied in this work to both the concrete and the steel material constitutive laws to predict the nonlinear cyclic response and failure mechanism of concrete shear walls. Different categories of wall specimens known to produce a different response under in plane cyclic loading for their varied geometric and detailing characteristics are considered in this study, namely: 1) scaled wall specimens designed according to the European seismic design code and 2) unique full-scale wall specimens detailed according to the U.S. design code to develop a ductile behavior under cyclic loading. To test the boundaries of application of the proposed method, two full-scale walls with a mixed shear-flexure response and different values of applied axial load are also considered. The results of this study show that the use of regularized constitutive models considerably enhances the response predictions capabilities of the model with regards to global force-drift response and failure mode. The simulations presented in this thesis demonstrate the proposed model to be a valuable tool for researchers and engineers.