Performance measurement review: a comparison between English and Italian companies

Il sistema di misurazione delle performance (PMS) ha ricevuto particolare attenzione dalla ricerca in ambito accademico e dalle aziende che ogni anno investono risorse nell’implementazione e nel miglioramento di questo strumento. I ruoli assegnati al PMS possono essere: misurazione della performance, implementazione della strategia, comunicazione, allineamento dei comportamenti, apprendimento e miglioramento. Queste differenti finalità sottolineano quanto sia strategica un’efficace implementazione di tale strumento. Negli ultimi anni le aziende si trovano a dover competere in ambienti sempre più turbolenti e mutevoli. La capacità di adattarsi al cambiamento è fondamentale, pertanto anche il PMS deve essere aggiornato per garantire un’implementazione di Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) che siano appropriati e rilevanti, considerando le nuove priorità aziendali e le condizioni al contorno. Questa tesi ha come obiettivo quello di analizzare la revisione del PMS, in quanto un inappropriato set di KPIs implementati possono causare un indebolimento del potenziale di tale strumento ed ancor peggio un fallimento degli investimenti riguardanti tale strumento. L’approccio metodologico di questa tesi è un multiple case-study. Per avere una visione più ampia di come viene sviluppata la revisione del PMS nella pratica si è deciso di inserire nel campione aziende di grandi dimensioni operanti in differenti settori industriali. Le informazioni raccolte attraverso le interviste, hanno permesso di fornire un contributo non presente in letteratura: una categorizzazione delle revisioni svolte dalle aziende e riflessioni su di esse. La limitazione di questo studio è legata ad un basso numero interviste svolte.

Biogas and bio-hydrogen: production and uses. A review

The first part of this essay aims at investigating the already available and promising technologies for the biogas and bio-hydrogen production from anaerobic digestion of different organic substrates. One strives to show all the peculiarities of this complicate process, such as continuity, number of stages, moisture, biomass preservation and rate of feeding. The main outcome of this part is the awareness of the huge amount of reactor configurations, each of which suitable for a few types of substrate and circumstance. Among the most remarkable results, one may consider first of all the wet continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTR), right to face the high waste production rate in urbanised and industrialised areas. Then, there is the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB), aimed at the biomass preservation in case of highly heterogeneous feedstock, which can also be treated in a wise co-digestion scheme. On the other hand, smaller and scattered rural realities can be served by either wet low-rate digesters for homogeneous agricultural by-products (e.g. fixed-dome) or the cheap dry batch reactors for lignocellulose waste and energy crops (e.g. hybrid batch-UASB). The biological and technical aspects raised during the first chapters are later supported with bibliographic research on the important and multifarious large-scale applications the products of the anaerobic digestion may have. After the upgrading techniques, particular care was devoted to their importance as biofuels, highlighting a further and more flexible solution consisting in the reforming to syngas. Then, one shows the electricity generation and the associated heat conversion, stressing on the high potential of fuel cells (FC) as electricity converters. Last but not least, both the use as vehicle fuel and the injection into the gas pipes are considered as promising applications. The consideration of the still important issues of the bio-hydrogen management (e.g. storage and delivery) may lead to the conclusion that it would be far more challenging to implement than bio-methane, which can potentially “inherit” the assets of the similar fossil natural gas. Thanks to the gathered knowledge, one devotes a chapter to the energetic and financial study of a hybrid power system supplied by biogas and made of different pieces of equipment (natural gas thermocatalitic unit, molten carbonate fuel cell and combined-cycle gas turbine structure). A parallel analysis on a bio-methane-fed CCGT system is carried out in order to compare the two solutions. Both studies show that the apparent inconvenience of the hybrid system actually emphasises the importance of extending the computations to a broader reality, i.e. the upstream processes for the biofuel production and the environmental/social drawbacks due to fossil-derived emissions. Thanks to this “boundary widening”, one can realise the hidden benefits of the hybrid over the CCGT system.

An integrated system for building and running reproducible research

Our generation of computational scientists is living in an exciting time: not only do we get to pioneer important algorithms and computations, we also get to set standards on how computational research should be conducted and published. From Euclid’s reasoning and Galileo’s experiments, it took hundreds of years for the theoretical and experimental branches of science to develop standards for publication and peer review. Computational science, rightly regarded as the third branch, can walk the same road much faster. The success and credibility of science are anchored in the willingness of scientists to expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by other scientists. This requires the complete and open exchange of data, procedures and materials. The idea of a “replication by other scientists” in reference to computations is more commonly known as “reproducible research”. In this context the journal “EAI Endorsed Transactions on Performance & Modeling, Simulation, Experimentation and Complex Systems” had the exciting and original idea to make the scientist able to submit simultaneously the article and the computation materials (software, data, etc..) which has been used to produce the contents of the article. The goal of this procedure is to allow the scientific community to verify the content of the paper, reproducing it in the platform independently from the OS chosen, confirm or invalidate it and especially allow its reuse to reproduce new results. This procedure is therefore not helpful if there is no minimum methodological support. In fact, the raw data sets and the software are difficult to exploit without the logic that guided their use or their production. This led us to think that in addition to the data sets and the software, an additional element must be provided: the workflow that relies all of them.