1 resultado para Model of Decision Making
em AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Archive of European Integration (18)
- Aston University Research Archive (89)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (11)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (84)
- Brock University, Canada (14)
- Brunel University (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (7)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (42)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (33)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (7)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (6)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (30)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (15)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (34)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (15)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (4)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (13)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (13)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (19)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (13)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (24)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (77)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (21)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (85)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Group work allows participants to pool their thoughts and examine difficulties from several angles. In these settings, it is possible to attempt things that an individual could not achieve, combining a variety of abilities and knowledge to tackle more complicated and large-scale challenges. That’s why nowadays collaborative work is becoming more and more widespread to solve complex innovation dilemmas. Since innovation isn’t a tangible thing, most innovation teams used to take decisions based on performance KPIs such as forecasted engagement, projected profitability, investments required, cultural impacts etc. Have you ever wondered the reason why sometimes innovation group processes come out with decisions which are not the optimal meeting point of all the KPIs? Has this decision been influenced by other factors? Some researchers account part of this phenomenon to the emotions in group-based interaction between participants. I will develop a literature review that is split into three parts: first, I will consider some emotions theories from an individual perspective; secondly, a wider view of collective interactions theories will be provided; lastly, I will supply some recent collective interaction empirical studies. After the theoretical and empirical gaps have been tackled, the study will additionally move forward with a methodological point of view, about the Circumplex Model, which is the model I used to evaluate emotions in my research. This model has been applied to SUGAR project, which is the biggest design thinking academy worldwide.