Machine Learning algorithm on seat comfort level measurement, mapping pressure values with body regions

The comfort level of the seat has a major effect on the usage of a vehicle; thus, car manufacturers have been working on elevating car seat comfort as much as possible. However, still, the testing and evaluation of comfort are done using exhaustive trial and error testing and evaluation of data. In this thesis, we resort to machine learning and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to develop a fully automated approach. Even though this approach has its advantages in minimizing time and using a large set of data, it takes away the degree of freedom of the engineer on making decisions. The focus of this study is on filling the gap in a two-step comfort level evaluation which used pressure mapping with body regions to evaluate the average pressure supported by specific body parts and the Self-Assessment Exam (SAE) questions on evaluation of the person’s interest. This study has created a machine learning algorithm that works on giving a degree of freedom to the engineer in making a decision when mapping pressure values with body regions using ANN. The mapping is done with 92% accuracy and with the help of a Graphical User Interface (GUI) that facilitates the process during the testing time of comfort level evaluation of the car seat, which decreases the duration of the test analysis from days to hours.

A ROS-based Workspace Control and Trajectory Planner for a seven degrees of freedom Robotic arm

In this Bachelor Thesis I want to provide readers with tools and scripts for the control of a 7DOF manipulator, backed up by some theory of Robotics and Computer Science, in order to better contextualize the work done. In practice, we will see most common software, and developing environments, used to cope with our task: these include ROS, along with visual simulation by VREP and RVIZ, and an almost "stand-alone" ROS extension called MoveIt!, a very complete programming interface for trajectory planning and obstacle avoidance. As we will better appreciate and understand in the introduction chapter, the capability of detecting collision objects through a camera sensor, and re-plan to the desired end-effector pose, are not enough. In fact, this work is implemented in a more complex system, where recognition of particular objects is needed. Through a package of ROS and customized scripts, a detailed procedure will be provided on how to distinguish a particular object, retrieve its reference frame with respect to a known one, and then allow navigation to that target. Together with technical details, the aim is also to report working scripts and a specific appendix (A) you can refer to, if desiring to put things together.

Direct Kinematics of Underactuated Cable-Driven Parallel Robots: Sensitivity to Redundant Measurements

Underactuated cable-driven parallel robots (UACDPRs) shift a 6-degree-of-freedom end-effector (EE) with fewer than 6 cables. This thesis proposes a new automatic calibration technique that is applicable for under-actuated cable-driven parallel robots. The purpose of this work is to develop a method that uses free motion as an exciting trajectory for the acquisition of calibration data. The key point of this approach is to find a relationship between the unknown parameters to be calibrated (the lengths of the cables) and the parameters that could be measured by sensors (the swivel pulley angles measured by the encoders and roll-and-pitch angles measured by inclinometers on the platform). The equations involved are the geometrical-closure equations and the finite-difference velocity equations, solved using the least-squares algorithm. Simulations are performed on a parallel robot driven by 4 cables for validation. The final purpose of the calibration method is, still, the determination of the platform initial pose. As a consequence of underactuation, the EE is underconstrained and, for assigned cable lengths, the EE pose cannot be obtained by means of forward kinematics only. Hence, a direct-kinematics algorithm for a 4-cable UACDPR using redundant sensor measurements is proposed. The proposed method measures two orientation parameters of the EE besides cable lengths, in order to determine the other four pose variables, namely 3 position coordinates and one additional orientation parameter. Then, we study the performance of the direct-kinematics algorithm through the computation of the sensitivity of the direct-kinematics solution to measurement errors. Furthermore, position and orientation error upper limits are computed for bounded cable lengths errors resulting from the calibration procedure, and roll and pitch angles errors which are due to inclinometer inaccuracies.