From the traditional verification approach to the spatial methods: a study of applicability of the SAL metric in the framework of the WMO project MesoVICT

Increasing in resolution of numerical weather prediction models has allowed more and more realistic forecasts of atmospheric parameters. Due to the growing variability into predicted fields the traditional verification methods are not always able to describe the model ability because they are based on a grid-point-by-grid-point matching between observation and prediction. Recently, new spatial verification methods have been developed with the aim of show the benefit associated to the high resolution forecast. Nested in among of the MesoVICT international project, the initially aim of this work is to compare the newly tecniques remarking advantages and disadvantages. First of all, the MesoVICT basic examples, represented by synthetic precipitation fields, have been examined. Giving an error evaluation in terms of structure, amplitude and localization of the precipitation fields, the SAL method has been studied more thoroughly respect to the others approaches with its implementation in the core cases of the project. The verification procedure has concerned precipitation fields over central Europe: comparisons between the forecasts performed by the 00z COSMO-2 model and the VERA (Vienna Enhanced Resolution Analysis) have been done. The study of these cases has shown some weaknesses of the methodology examined; in particular has been highlighted the presence of a correlation between the optimal domain size and the extention of the precipitation systems. In order to increase ability of SAL, a subdivision of the original domain in three subdomains has been done and the method has been applied again. Some limits have been found in cases in which at least one of the two domains does not show precipitation. The overall results for the subdomains have been summarized on scatter plots. With the aim to identify systematic errors of the model the variability of the three parameters has been studied for each subdomain.

Evaluation of most promising options for the C1 to C2-coupling: alternative formate coupling

This thesis work contains an overview of potential alternative options to couple formate produced from CO2 with other coupling partners than formate itself. Ultimately, the intent is to produce high value chemicals from CO2 at a high selectivity and conversion, whilst keeping the required utility of electrons in the electrochemical CO2 conversion at a minimum. To select and find new coupling partners, a framework was developed upon which a broad variety of candidates were assessed and ranked. A multi-stage process was used to select first potential classes of molecules. For each class, a variety of commercially available compounds was analysed in depth for its potential suitability in the reaction with the active carbonite intermediate. This analysis has shown that a wide variety of factors come into play and especially the reactivity of the hydride catalyst poses a mayor challenge. The three major potential classes of compounds suitable for the coupling are carbon oxides (CO2 & CO), and aldehydes. As a second step the remaining options were ranked to identify which compound to test first. In this ranking the reactants sustainability, ease of commercial operation and commercial attractiveness of the compound were considered. The highest-ranking compounds that proposed the highest potential are CO2, benzaldehyde and para-formaldehyde. In proof-of-principle experiments CO2 could successfully be incorporated in the form of carbonate, oxalate and potentially formate. The overall incorporation efficiency based on the hydride consumption was shown to be 50%. It is suggested to continue this work with mechanistic studies to understand the reaction in detail as, based on further gained knowledge, the reaction can then be optimized towards optimal CO2 incorporation in the form of oxalate.