Double Dyke System - Natural engineering solutions

According to various studies, the effects of climate change will be a danger to ecosystems and the population, especially in coastal areas, increasing the risk of floods. Authorities are taking action to prevent future disasters using traditional engineering solutions. These solutions can have high environmental and economic costs, fixing the coastline, increasing the salinization of aquifers, and can be subject to failure mechanisms. For this reason, studies were made to use natural engineering solutions for coastal protection, instead of traditional solutions, to achieve the UN SDGs. Coastal ecosystems have the natural ability to repair and restore themselves, increasing soil elevation, and attenuating waves. One of these solutions is the Double Dyke System, consisting of creating a salt marsh between the first dyke and a second inland. The goal is to protect the coasts and to restore ecosystems. The purpose of this study is to compare the costs of natural engineering solutions with traditional ones. It is assumed that these solutions may be more effective and less expensive in the long run. For this evaluation, a suitability analysis of the polders in the Dutch Zeeland region to assess the costs and benefits under different SLR scenarios was made. A saline intrusion model was also created to analyze the effects of a salt marsh on the aquifers. From the analyzes conducted, the implementation of the DDS turns out to be the cheapest coastal defense system in all SLR scenarios. The presence of a salt marsh could also have a positive impact on the prevention of saline intrusion in the various scenarios considered. The DDS could have a positive economic and environmental impact in the long term, reducing the investment costs for coastal defense and bringing important benefits for the protection of man and nature. Despite the results, more studies are needed on the efficiency of this defense system and on the economic evaluation of non-marketable ecosystem services.

Assessing the relationship between bee/flower diversity and vegetation structural heterogeneity through UAV photogrammetry

The ecosystem services provided by bees are very important. Factors as habitat fragmentation, intensive agriculture and climate change are contributing to the decline of bee populations. The use of remote sensing could be a useful tool for the recognition of sites with a high diversity, before performing a more expensive survey in the field. In this study the ability of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) images to estimate biodiversity at local scale has been analysed testing the concept of the Height Variation Hypothesis (HVH). This approach states that, the higher the vegetation height heterogeneity (HH) measured by remote sensing information, the higher the vertical complexity and the higher vegetation species diversity. In this thesis the concept has been brought to a higher level, in order to understand if the vegetation HH can be considered a proxy also of bee species diversity and abundance. We tested this approach collecting field data on bees/flowers and RGB images through an UAV campaign in 30 grasslands in the South of the Netherlands. The Canopy Height Model (CHM) were derived through the photogrammetry technique "Structure from Motion" (SfM) with resolutions of 10cm, 25cm, 50cm. Successively, the HH assessed on the CHM using the Rao's Q heterogeneity index was correlated to the field data (bee abundance, diversity and bee/flower species richness). The correlations were all positive and significant. The highest R2 values were found when the HH was calculated at 10cm and correlated to bee species richness (R2 = 0.41) and Shannon’s H index (R2 = 0.38). Using a lower spatial resolution the goodness of fit slightly decreases. For flower species richness the R2 ranged between 0.36 to 0.39. Our results suggest that methods based on the concept behind the HVH, in this case deriving information of HH from UAV data, can be developed into valuable tools for large-scale, standardized and cost-effective monitoring of flower diversity and of the habitat quality for bees.