Citizen science as a tool for the environmental quality assessment of the Mediterranean coastal habitats

The growing need to assess the environmental status of the Mediterranean coastal marine habitats and the large availability of data collected by Reef Check Italia onlus (RCI) volunteers suggest the possibility to develop innovative and reliable indices that may support decision makers in applying conservation strategies. The aims of this study were to check the reliability of data collected by RCI volunteers, analyse the spatial and temporal distribution of RCI available data, resume the knowledge on the biology and ecology of the monitored species, and develop innovative indices to asses the ecological quality of Mediterranean subtidal rocky shores and coralligenous habitats. Subtidal rocky shores and coralligenous were chosen because these are the habitats more attractive for divers; therefore mlst data are referring to them, moreover subtidal rocky bottom are strongly affected by coastal urbanisation, land use, fishing and tourist activities, that increase pollution, turbidity and sedimentation. Non-indigenous species (NIS) have been recognized as a major threat to the integrity of Mediterranean native communities because of their proliferation, spread and impact on resident communities. Monitoring of NIS’ spreading dynamics at the basin spatial scale is difficult but urgent. According to a field test, the training provided by RCI appears adequate to obtain reliable data by volunteers. Based on data collected by RCI volunteers, three main categories of indices were developed: indices based on species diversity, indices on the occurrence non-indigenous species, and indices on species sensitive toward physical, chemical and biological disturbances. As case studies, indices were applied to stretches of coastline defined according to management criteria (province territories and marine protected areas). The assessments of ecological quality in the Tavolara Marine Protected Area using the species sensitivities index were consisten with those previously obtained with traditional methods.

Portofino Seaweed Garden: a local citizen science case study on Ericaria amentacea (C.Agardh) Molinari & Guiry, 2020 restoration

Ericaria amentacea is an endemic alga of the Mediterranean Sea that lives in the littoral rocky fringe. The species is sensitive to environmental changes, so it’s used to assess the water ecological quality. Nevertheless, E. amentacea is deeply impacted by coastal development which cause rapid regression despite data on its distribution and healthy status are still limited. Moreover, it’s little known by people outside the scientific community. In this context, Portofino Seaweed Garden was born, a conservation and citizen science project aim to involve marine outdoor enthusiasts in protecting and restoring E. amentacea, creating a submerged garden. Restoration measures have been encouraged by EU regulations. Here, using citizen science, 1) I evaluated the spatial variability of E. amentacea abundance along the central-eastern Ligurian coast, to evaluate its status and choose donor and restoration sites. 2) I carried out an E. amentacea restoration (with outplanting lab-cultured embryos on 50 clay tiles). 3) I assessed the community involvement and education of volunteers. Simple protocol was created to train them on the monitoring. Unprecedented E. amentacea reproductive mismatch affected the restoration performance, probably caused by marine heat wave that hit the Mediterranean in summer 2022. After fertile apices collection in Pontetto (GE) and during laboratory phase, gametes spawned on the discs didn’t settle as expected. Only 16 tiles showed juveniles and they were outplanted at Punta Castello (C zone of Portofino MPA). Unfortunately, they didn’t survive in the field due to an interplay of physical and biological factors. From citizen science point of view, the project demonstrated positive outcomes of collaborations between people and scientists by involving more than 100 participants. Citizen scientists became specialize in the protocol providing quality data for E. amentacea conservation. Current results suggest that outplanting should be further tested.

Soil quality in an experimental vineyard treated with biochar and compost

In order to increase fertility of agricultural soils, in the framework of circular economy, the use of soil amendments such as biochar, compost, and mixtures of the two, has been implemented in recent years. Although it has been demonstrated that their use can improve the physico-chemical characteristics of soil and plant yield, few studies investigated the effect of these amendments on the soil fauna, and consequently the biological quality of soils. This study aimed to provide information on soil fauna, in particular microarthropods , in plots of an experimental vineyard treated with different soil amendments (biochar, compost, and CB mix, i.e. a mixture of biochar and compost) compared to untreated plots. What emerged from this study is that taxa abundances are significantly increased in compost-treated soil samples compared to untreated and CB mix ones. The value of the QBS-ar index obtained in soil samples treated with CB mix is lower than in samples treated with compost, biochar, and untreated, although the difference was not statistically significant. The physico-chemical soil characteristics are, in general, significantly more favorable in samples treated with CB mix than in the control, although the soil fauna seems to be partially negatively influenced by the treatment with CB mix. In fact, the number of taxa, in particular the number of taxa most adapted to edaphic life, are significantly negatively affected by the application of the CB mix. Concluding, improved physico-chemical characteristics induced by soil amendments do not always correspond to a positive response of the soil fauna, at least with respect to the QBS-ar approach.

Ecological status of mesophotic biogenic reefs off Chioggia

This study investigated the coralligenous reefs' benthic assemblages at 6 sites off Chioggia, in the northern Adriatic Sea, comparing 2 different methods of analysis of photographic samples: the grid method (overlapping a grid of 400 cells) and the random point method (random distribution of 100 points on the photo). For the first method, taxonomic recognition and the percentage coverage estimations were performed manually using photoQuad software. In the second, CoralNet semi-automated web-based annotation system was applied. This allows for assisted and supervised identification, the success rate of which gradually improves after initial software training. The results obtained with the two methods of analysing photographic samples are slightly different. The random points method gives lower species richness values and some differences in coverage estimations; all of this is reflected in the calculation of the biotic index. NAMBER values are significantly lower with the random points method and provide locally different classifications (3 out of 6 sites). However, the results obtained with the two methods are closely related to each other and depict a similar spatial trend. These results rise caution in applying different, albeit similar, methods in the analysis of benthic assemblages aimed to environmental quality assessment.