Involvement and detachment in David Cameron and Ed Miliband’s political discourse. An analysis of deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ in UK 2015 General Election news interviews

The goal of my study is to investigate the relationship between selected deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ and the involvement/detachment dichotomy in a sample of television news interviews. I focus on the use of personal pronouns in political discourse. Drawing upon Caffi’s (2007) classification of mitigating devices into bushes, hedges and shields, I focus on deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’: I examine the way a selection of ‘I’-related deictic shields is employed in a collection of news interviews broadcast during the electoral campaign prior to the UK 2015 General Election. My purpose is to uncover the frequencies of each of the linguistic items selected and the pragmatic functions of those linguistic items in the involvement/detachment dichotomy. The research is structured as follows. Chapter 1 provides an account of previous studies on the three main areas of research: speech event analysis, institutional interaction and the news interview, and the UK 2015 General Election television programmes. Chapter 2 is centred on the involvement/detachment dichotomy: I provide an overview of nonlinguistic and linguistic features of involvement and detachment at all levels of sentence structure. Chapter 3 contains a detailed account of the data collection and data analysis process. Chapter 4 provides an accurate description of results in three steps: quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis and discussion of the pragmatic functions of the selected linguistic features of involvement and detachment. Chapter 5 includes a brief summary of the investigation, reviews the main findings, and indicates limitations of the study and possible inputs for further research. The results of the analysis confirm that, while some of the linguistic items examined point toward involvement, others have a detaching effect. I therefore conclude that deictic shields on the pronoun ‘I’ permit the realisation of the involvement/detachment dichotomy in the speech genre of the news interview.

Mocku for change: an explorative study on the use of “mockumentary” as a new language for climate change education

In the ‘society of acceleration and uncertainty’ (Rosa, 2013), the young are struggling to interpret our complex and fast-changing world. The entity and the velocity of changes are so enormous that we need new narratives or languages to conceptualise them. Among those changes “Climate Change” is placed in a particular difficult position. As the writer A. Ghosh said: “The current climate crisis is also a crisis of culture, and thus of the imagination”. In fact, in today’s literature and cinema a strong dichotomy exists between fictional and non-fictional works, but none of those extremities seems suitable to picture an “adequate representation” of climate change issues, particularly those that are related to future. The main goal of my study, carried out within FEDORA EU project, was to understand to what extent the hybrid film form called “mockumentary” (a language that adopts the aesthetics of factual production to give an illusion of truth to invented stories) could inspire and help students in overcoming the mentioned dichotomy, working as a tool to foster the development of argumentative and imaginative skills needed to picture “immaginary yet realistic” climate change scenarios.