Applicazione della metodologia Life Cycle Assessment al Passito di Pantelleria

Il presente studio riguarda l’applicazione della metodologia Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) ad una bottiglia di Passito di Pantelleria, prodotta dall’Azienda vitivinicola “Donnafugata” localizzata nel comune di Marsala in Sicilia. L’obiettivo di tale studio consiste nel quantificare e valutare le prestazioni energetico-ambientali derivanti dall’intero ciclo di vita del processo produttivo, nonché le fasi di produzione che presentano il maggiore impatto. Lo studio è stato ulteriormente approfondito effettuando una comparazione tra la produzione della singola bottiglia di Passito nei diversi anni 2007, 2008 e 2009 con lo scopo di determinare quali tra questi risulta avere il maggiore impatto ambientale. Gli impatti ambientali di un’Azienda vitivinicola risultano avere la loro particolare importanza in quanto la produzione di vino è un processo di natura complessa. Di conseguenza tali impatti possono compromettere le componenti fondamentali del processo produttivo, a partire dalle uve coltivate in vigna fino ad arrivare in cantina, dove avviene la trasformazione dell’uva in mosto e la successiva fase di vinificazione che determina il prodotto finale messo in commercio. Proprio attraverso il fluire delle seguenti fasi di trasformazione, in che misura queste consumano energia e producono emissioni? È importante sottolineare che lo studio del ciclo di vita di un prodotto può essere considerato come un supporto fondamentale allo sviluppo di schemi di etichettatura ambientale attraverso i quali è possibile indirizzare il consumatore finale verso beni più rispettosi dell’ambiente e fornire informazioni chiare e trasparenti sulle prestazioni ambientali del prodotto stesso. Allo stesso tempo tale strumento può essere adoperato dall’azienda per fornire garanzia delle credenziali ambientali del prodotto acquisendo così un vantaggio competitivo rispetto alle aziende concorrenti. Infatti, nell’ambito delle politiche comunitarie di prodotto, una delle applicazioni più significative della valutazione del ciclo di vita si ha nella dichiarazione ambientale di prodotto o EPD (Environmental Product Declaration). L’EPD è uno schema di certificazione volontaria che rappresenta un marchio di qualità ecologica per i prodotti, permettendo di comunicare informazioni oggettive, confrontabili e credibili relative alla prestazione ambientale degli stessi. Per essere convalidabili, le prestazioni ambientali presenti nelle EPD devono rispettare i requisiti stabiliti dal PCR- Product Category Rules, un documento nel quale sono presenti le regole per lo studio di una certa categoria di prodotto. Il presente lavoro può essere suddiviso in cinque step successivi. Il primo prevede la descrizione della metodologia LCA, adottata per la quantificazione dell’impatto ambientale, analizzandone singolarmente le quattro fasi principali che la caratterizzano; il secondo presenta la descrizione dell’Azienda vitivinicola e del Passito di Pantelleria, oggetto della valutazione, mettendo in evidenza anche le particolarità ambientali del territorio Pantesco in cui il prodotto prende vita; il terzo fornisce una descrizione delle caratteristiche principali dello strumento applicativo utilizzato per l’analisi, SimaPro nella versione 7.3; il quarto descrive le diverse attività di lavorazione svolte nel complesso processo di produzione della bottiglia di Passito, focalizzando l’attenzione sui componenti primari dell’oggetto di valutazione ed il quinto riguarda la descrizione dell’analisi LCA applicata alla singola bottiglia di Passito.

Flat roofs renovation: a life cycle approach for environmental impact assessment and economic effectiveness

The high energy consumption caused by the building sector and the continuous growth and ageing of the existing housing stock show the importance of housing renovation to improve the quality of the environment. This research compares the environmental performance of flat roof systems (insulation, roofing membrane and covering layer) using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The aim is to give indications on how to improve the environmental performance of housing. This research uses a reference building located in the Netherlands and considers environmental impacts related to materials, energy consumption for heating and maintenance activities. It indicates impact scores for each material taking into account interconnections between the layers and between the different parts of the life cycle. It compares the environmental and economic performances of PV panels and of different materials and thermal resistance values for the insulation. These comparisons show that PV panels are convenient from an environmental and economic point of view. The same is true for the insulation layer, especially for materials as PIR (polyisocyanurate) and EPS (expanded polystyrene). It shows that energy consumption for heating causes a larger share of impact scores than production of the materials and maintenance activities. The insulation also causes larger impact scores comparing to roofing membrane and covering layer. The results show which materials are preferable for flat roof renovation and what causes the largest shares of impact. This gives indication to the roofers and to other stakeholders about how to reduce the environmental impact of the existing housing stock.

Life cycle assessment (lca) of six separation methods of polyethylene and aluminum in tetra pak

In food and beverage industry, packaging plays a crucial role in protecting food and beverages and maintaining their organoleptic properties. Their disposal, unfortunately, is still difficult, mainly because there is a lack of economically viable systems for separating composite and multilayer materials. It is therefore necessary not only to increase research in this area, but also to set up pilot plants and implement these technologies on an industrial scale. LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) can fulfil these purposes. It allows an assessment of the potential environmental impacts associated with a product, service or process. The objective of this thesis work is to analyze the environmental performance of six separation methods, designed for separating the polymeric from the aluminum fraction in multilayered packaging. The first four methods utilize the chemical dissolution technique using Biodiesel, Cyclohexane, 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF) and Cyclopentyl-methyl-ether (CPME) as solvents. The last two applied the mechanical delamination technique with surfactant-activated water, using Ammonium laurate and Triethanolamine laurate as surfactants, respectively. For all six methods, the LCA methodology was applied and the corresponding models were built with the GaBi software version 10.6.2.9, specifically for LCA analyses. Unfortunately, due to a lack of data, it was not possible to obtain the results of the dissolution methods with the solvents 2-MeTHF and CPME; for the other methods, however, the individual environmental performances were calculated. Results revealed that the methods with the best environmental performance are method 2, for dissolution methods, and method 5, for delamination methods. This result is confirmed both by the analysis of normalized and weighted results and by the analysis of 'original' results. An hotspots analysis was also conducted.

Waste management in Forlì-Cesena province: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Forlì incinerator

This work assesses the environmental impact of a municipal solid waste incinerator with energy recovery in Forlì-Cesena province (Emilia-Romagna region, Italy). The methodology used is Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). As the plant already applies the best technologies available in waste treatment, this study focuses on the fate of the residues (bottom and fly ash) produced during combustion. Nine scenarios are made, based on different ash treatment disposing/recycling techniques. The functional unit is the amount of waste incinerated in 2011. Boundaries are set from waste arrival in the plant to the disposal/recovery of the residues produced, with energy recovery. Only the operative period is considered. Software used is GaBi 4 and the LCIA method used is CML2001. The impact categories analyzed are: abiotic depletion, acidification, eutrophication, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, global warming, human toxicity, ozone layer depletion, photochemical oxidant formation, terrestrial ecotoxicity and primary energy demand. Most of the data are taken from Herambiente. When primary data are not available, data from Ecoinvent and GaBi databases or literature data are used. The whole incineration process is sustainable, due to the relevant avoided impact given by co-generator. As far as regards bottom ash treatment, the most influential process is the impact savings from iron recovery. Bottom ash recycling in road construction or as building material are both valid alternatives, even if the first option faces legislative limits in Italy. Regarding fly ash inertization, the adding of cement and Ferrox treatment results the most feasible alternatives. However, this inertized fly ash can maintain its hazardous nature. The only method to ensure the stability of an inertized fly ash is to couple two different stabilization treatments. Ash stabilization technologies shall improve with the same rate of the flexibility of the national legislation about incineration residues recycling.

Life cycle assessment in construction field: A life cycle cost analysis of reinforcement concrete bridge

The present work is included in the context of the assessment of sustainability in the construction field and is aimed at estimating and analyzing life cycle cost of the existing reinforced concrete bridge “Viadotto delle Capre” during its entire life. This was accomplished by a comprehensive data collection and results evaluation. In detail, the economic analysis of the project is performed. The work has investigated possible design alternatives for maintenance/rehabilitation and end-of-life operations, when structural, functional, economic and also environmental requirements have to be fulfilled. In detail, the economic impact of different design options for the given reinforced concrete bridge have been assessed, whereupon the most economically, structurally and environmentally efficient scenario was chosen. The Integrated Life-Cycle Analysis procedure and Environmental Impact Assessment were also discussed in this work. The scope of this thesis is to illustrate that Life Cycle Cost analysis as part of Life Cycle Assessment approach could be effectively used to drive the design and management strategy of new and existing structures. The final objective of this contribution is to show how an economic analysis can influence decision-making in the definition of the most sustainable design alternatives. The designers can monitor the economic impact of different design strategies in order to identify the most appropriate option.

Towards the sustainable production of methyl methacrylate: A comparative analysis of industrial chemical production processes using life cycle assessment methodology

Increasing environmental awareness has been a significant driving force for innovations and process improvements in different sectors and the field of chemistry is not an outlier. Innovating around industrial chemical processes in line with current environmental responsibilities is however no mean feat. One of such hard to overhaul process is the production of methyl methacrylate (MMA) commonly produced via the acetone cyanohydrin (ACH) process developed back in the 1930s. Different alternatives to the ACH process have emerged over the years and the Alpha Lucite process has been particularly promising with a combined plant capacity of 370,000 metric tonnes in Singapore and Saudi Arabia. This study applied Life Cycle Assessment methodology to conduct a comparative analysis between the ACH and Lucite processes with the aim of ascertaining the effect of applying principles of green chemistry as a process improvement tool on overall environmental impacts. A further comparison was made between the Lucite process and a lab-scale process that is further improvement on the former, also based on green chemistry principles. Results showed that the Lucite process has higher impacts on resource scarcity and ecosystem health whereas the ACH process has higher impacts on human health. On the other hand, compared to the Lucite process the lab-scale process has higher impacts in both the ecosystem and human health categories with lower impacts only in the resource scarcity category. It was observed that the benefits of process improvements with green chemistry principles might not be apparent in some categories due to some limitations of the methodology. Process contribution analysis was also performed and it revealed that the contribution of energy is significant, therefore a sensitivity analysis with different energy scenarios was performed. An uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo analysis was also performed to validate the consistency of the results in each of the comparisons.

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a bio-fuel cell fed with waste biomass: potential for scale-up and process optimization

In this Thesis, a life cycle analysis (LCA) of a biofuel cell designed by a team from the University of Bologna was done. The purpose of this study is to investigate the possible environmental impacts of the production and use of the cell and a possible optimization for an industrial scale-up. To do so, a first part of the paper was devoted to studying the present literature on biomass, and fuel cell treatments and then LCA studies on them. The experimental part presents the work done to create the Life Cycle Inventory and Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Several alternative scenarios were created to study process optimization. Reagents and energy supply were changed. To examine whether this technology can be competitive, a comparison was made with some biofuel cell use scenarios with traditional biomass treatment technologies. The result of this study is that this technology is promising from an environmental point of view in case it is possible to recover nutrients in output, without excessive energy consumption, and to minimize the use of energy used to prepare the solution.

Analisi del fine vita degli pneumatici attraverso una metodologia Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

This study aims to show the scope of environment impact due to tyre treatments. The study scrutinises a firm’s case, Marangoni S.p.A, which is one of the first pneumatics treatments firm with emphasis on disposed and recostructed exhausted pneumatics. In particular those pneumatic’s treatments are two: reconstruction (30% of the whole amount of the pneumatics given) and incineration (70% of the whole amount of the pneumatics given). With LCA methods (EcoIndicator 99, EPS 2000, EDIP 97, IMPACT 2002) it has been possible to value the impact on the environments in terms of human health, ecosystem quality and resources. In addition, comparison with the principal process and subsidiary processes within the main one has brought to highlight how some results could be understood in different way. This interpretation should bring politics and socials network to take decision in order to save our planet.

Valutazione di impatto ambientale di un gruppo elettrogeno mediante Life Cycle Assessment: il caso COGEM.

Il presente lavoro ha come oggetto l’analisi di impatto ambientale, svolta mediante la metodologia Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) di un gruppo elettrogeno prodotto da COGEM s.r.l., azienda italiana situata a Castel d’Argile, nel bolognese, con l’obiettivo di supportare eventuali scelte di riprogettazione del prodotto anche in termini di Design for Disassembly. Dopo una prima analisi del contesto attuale in cui si colloca, la metodologia LCA è stata studiata nel dettaglio per poterla poi applicare al prodotto in oggetto. Esso è stato individuato mediante un’analisi delle vendite di COGEM, in seguito si è svolta una fase di raccolta dati e si sviluppata l’analisi LCA usando il software SimaPro 7.1. I risultati ottenuti hanno consentito di individuare le possibili aree di miglioramento dell’impatto ambientale dell’intero ciclo di vita del gruppo elettrogeno. In particolare si sono valutate due soluzioni innovative: un gruppo elettrogeno alimentato a olio vegetale e uno progettato in ottica DFD per consentire un corretto smaltimento dei rifiuti.

Life Cycle Assessment comparativo tra il processo di co-digestione della frazione organica dei rifiuti solidi urbani e dei fanghi di depurazione disidratati e il sistema di gestione attuale. Il caso di Bagnacavallo (RA)

Waste management is becoming, year after year, always more important both for the costs associated with it and for the ever increasing volumes of waste generated. The discussion on the fate of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) leads everyday to new solutions. Many alternatives are proposed, ranging from incineration to composting passing through anaerobic digestion. “For Biogas” is a collaborative effort, between C.I.R.S.A. and R.E.S. cooperative, whose main goal is to generate “green” energy from both biowaste and sludge anaerobic co-digestion. Specifically, the project include a pilot plant receiving dewatered sludge from both urban and agro-industrial sewage (DS) and the organic fraction of MSW (in 2/1 ratio) which is digested in absence of oxygen to produce biogas and digestate. Biogas is piped to a co-generation system producing power and heat reused in the digestion process itself, making it independent from the national grid. Digestate undergoes a process of mechanical separation giving a liquid fraction, introduced in the treatment plant, and a solid fraction disposed in landfill (in future it will be further processed to obtain compost). This work analyzed and estimated the impacts generated by the pilot plant in its operative phase. Once the model was been characterized, on the basis of the CML2001 methodology, a comparison is made with the present scenario assumed for OFMSW and DS. Actual scenario treats separately the two fractions: the organic one is sent to a composting plant, while sludge is sent to landfill. Results show that the most significant difference between the two scenarios is in the GWP category as the project "For Biogas" is able to generate “zero emission” power and heat. It also generates a smaller volume of waste for disposal. In conclusion, the analysis evaluated the performance of two alternative methods of management of OFMSW and DS, highlighting that "For Biogas" project is to be preferred to the actual scenario.

Impatto ambientale di sistemi di riscaldamento domestico a biomasse: applicazione della metodologia LCA (Life Cycle Assessment)

Le biomasse hanno sempre rappresentato per l’umanità una fonte estremamente versatile e rinnovabile di risorse e tutt’oggi il loro impiego risulta vantaggioso in particolare per produrre energia termica ed elettrica attraverso processi di combustione, sistemi che tuttavia emettono sostanze dannose verso la salute umana e l’ecosistema. Queste pressioni ambientali hanno indotto alcune amministrazioni regionali (fra cui la Lombardia) a bandire temporaneamente l’installazione di nuovi impianti a biomasse, per prevenire e contenere le emissioni in atmosfera a tutela della salute e dell’ambiente. Il presente studio intende approfondire l’effetto ambientale di tali sistemi di riscaldamento domestico attraverso la tecnologia di analisi LCA (Life Cycle Assessment). Lo scopo dell’elaborato di Tesi consiste nell’eseguire un’analisi dell’intero ciclo di vita di due processi di riscaldamento domestico che utilizzino biomassa legnosa: una stufa innovativa a legna e una stufa a pellet. L’analisi ha quindi posto a confronto i due scenari con mezzi di riscaldamento domestico alternativi quali il boiler a gas, il pannello solare termico integrato con caldaia a gas e la pompa di calore elettrica. È emerso che tra i due scenari a biomassa quello a legna risulti decisamente più impattante verso le categorie salute umana e qualità dell’ecosistema , mentre per il pellet si è riscontrato un impatto maggiore del precedente nella categoria consumo di risorse. Dall’analisi di contributo è emerso che l’impatto percentuale maggiore per entrambi gli scenari sia legato allo smaltimento delle ceneri, pertanto si è ipotizzata una soluzione alternativa in cui esse vengano smaltite nell’inceneritore, riducendo così gli impatti. I risultati del punteggio singolo mostrano come lo scenario di riscaldamento a legna produca un quantitativo di particolato superiore rispetto al processo di riscaldamento a pellet, chiaramente dovuto alle caratteristiche chimico-fisiche dei combustibili ed alla efficienza di combustione. Dal confronto con gli scenari di riscaldamento alternativi è emerso che il sistema più impattante per le categorie salute umana e qualità dell’ecosistema rimane quello a legna, seguito dal pellet. I processi alternativi presentano impatti maggiori alla voce consumo di risorse. Per avvalorare i risultati ottenuti per i due metodi a biomassa è stata eseguita un’analisi di incertezza attraverso il metodo Monte Carlo, ad un livello di confidenza del 95%. In conclusione si può affermare che i sistemi di riscaldamento domestico che impiegano processi di combustione della biomassa legnosa sono certamente assai vantaggiosi, poiché pareggiano il quantitativo di CO2 emessa con quella assorbita durante il ciclo di vita, ma al tempo stesso possono causare maggiori danni alla salute umana e all’ecosistema rispetto a quelli tradizionali.