Detection and localization of GLUTs in spermatozoa from different domestic species

Sperm cells need hexoses as a substrate for their function, for both the maintenance of membrane homeostasis and the movement of the tail. These cells have a peculiar metabolism that has not yet been fully understood, but it is clear that they obtain energy from hexoses through glycolisis and/or oxidative phosphorylation. Spermatozoa are in contact with different external environments, beginning from the testicular and epididymal fluid, passing to the seminal plasma and finally to the female genital tract fluids; in addition, with the spread of reproductive biotechnologies, sperm cells are diluted and stored in various media, containing different energetic substrates. To utilize these energetic sources, sperm cells, as other eukaryotic cells, have a well-constructed protein system, that is mainly represented by the GLUT family proteins. These transporters have a membrane-spanning α-helix structure and work as an enzymatic pump that permit a fast gradient dependent passage of sugar molecules through the lipidic bilayer of sperm membrane. Many GLUTs have been studied in man, bull and rat spermatozoa; the presence of some GLUTs has been also demonstrated in boar and dog spermatozoa. The aims of the present study were - to determine the presence of GLUTs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in boar, horse, dog and donkey spermatozoa and to describe their localization; - to study eventual changes in GLUTs location after capacitation and acrosome reaction in boar, stallion and dog spermatozoa; - to determine possible changes in GLUTs localization after capacitation induced by insulin and IGF stimulation in boar spermatozoa; - to evaluate changes in GLUTs localization after flow-cytometric sex sorting in boar sperm cells. GLUTs 1, 2, 3 and 5 presence and localization have been demonstrated in boar, stallion, dog and donkey spermatozoa by western blotting and immunofluorescence analysis; a relocation in GLUTs after capacitation has been observed only in dog sperm cells, while no changes have been observed in the other species examined. As for boar, the stimulation of the capacitation with insulin and IGF didn’t cause any change in GLUTs localization, as well as for the flow cytometric sorting procedure. In conclusion, this study confirms the presence of GLUTs 1, 2 ,3 and 5 in boar, dog, stallion and donkey spermatozoa, while GLUT 4 seems to be absent, as a confirmation of other studies. Only in dog sperm cells capacitating conditions induce a change in GLUTs distribution, even if the physiological role of these changes should be deepened.

Effect of season and cryopreservation on oxidative status of stallion spermatozoa

The aim of this study was to investigate 1) the effect of different ROS and lipid peroxidation on sperm quality, and 2) differences in ROS between non-breeding and breeding seasons. Eighteen ejaculates from six stallions were collected in January and July (N = 36), processed for freezing. After 90’ of cooling, some straws were not frozen (unfrozen), some were frozen (frozen). Rapid sperm (RAP, CASA), membrane-acrosome integrity (MAI), high mitochondrial membrane potential (Mpos), intracellular Ca2+ (Fneg), lipid peroxidation (BODIPY), ROS (DCFH, MitoSOX) and chromatin fragmentation (DFI%) were evaluated by flow cytometry during incubation at +37°C at T0 (after 90 min at +4°C and after thawing), 3, 6, 12 and 24h. In winter, ROS and BODIPY were higher and faster (P < 0.0001) in frozen than unfrozen; DFI% was similar at 0h (P > 0.05) but higher in frozen after 3h of incubation (P < 0.0001). RAP, PMAI, Mpos and Fneg were lower in frozen compared to unfrozen (P < 0.0001). Summer and winter data were compared. Overall, ROS concentrations and BODIPY were higher and faster (P < 0.001) in winter, DFI% was lower in winter (P < 0.001), but similar between the two groups within seasons after thawing. Differences were found at 3h and 12h for DFI%, and for DCFH and MitoSOX at 0h and 12h of incubation in winter and summer respectively. A moderate positive correlations was found between DFI% and MitoSOX, DCFH, BODIPY, whereas a negative correlation, stronger in winter, between RAP, PMAI, Mpos, Fneg and BODIPY, DCFH, MitoSOX. DFI was not different in unfrozen and frozen, despite a significant higher ROS level in winter, and incubation allowed to asses differences in DFI, suggesting that incubation should be included when evaluating stallion frozen semen. Higher level of ROS and BODIPY in winter was less detrimental than freezing-thawing.

Effects of glyphosate and Roundup upon mammalian gametes

The wide use of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) has become a controversial issue due to the potential harmful effects on human health. Commercial formulations, among which Roundup is the most famous one, contain a number of adjuvants inside; most of these are patented and not publicly known, therefore, they can act differently from glyphosate alone and might strengthen its toxic effect. Our study is focused on GBHs reproductive toxicity with a special regard to glyphosate and Roundup impact on male and female mammalian gametes after exposure to concentrations ranging from the one recommended for agricultural use (0.1% Roundup, containing 360 µg/mL glyphosate) to 70-fold lower or more. Sperm quality analysis, either on boar and stallion, showed that Roundup has much more detrimental impact than glyphosate at equivalent concentrations on spermatozoa function and survival. Basing on our results, the toxic effect of these pesticides on spermatozoa may be linked to an impairment in mitochondrial activity and a subsequent decrease in ATP production and/or alterations in the redox balance, which impact cell motility and plasma membrane stability. Moreover, a different species sensitivity to GBHs may exists as high doses of glyphosate affected sperm quality only in boar and not in stallion; furthermore, Roundup had deleterious effects at lower doses in the first compared to the latter. With regard to female gametes, we found that glyphosate and Roundup exposure during IVM detrimentally affect the subsequent developmental ability of swine embryos, providing further evidence of their potential toxic effect on female reproductive system. In addition, Roundup altered steroidogenesis and increased oocyte ROS levels. Therefore, according to our results, we can conclude that GBHs exert a negative impact on both male and female gametes and that Roundup adjuvants enhance glyphosate toxic effects and/or are biologically active in their side-effect.