Stenodactilina e lanceolina: due nuove potenti “ribosome-inactivating proteins” bicatenarie. Purificazione, caratterizzazione chimico-fisica e studio dei meccanismi citotossici

Two lectins, called lanceolin and stenodactylin, were purified by affinity chromatography on CL Sepharose 6B from the caudices of the Passifloraceae Adenia lanceolata and Adenia stenodactyla, respectively. They are glycoproteins with Mw of 61,243 (lanceolin) and 63,131 daltons (stenodactylin), consisting of an enzymatic A chain linked to a larger B chain with lectin properties, with N-terminal amino acid sequences similar to that of volkensin, the toxic lectin from Adenia volkensii. These two lectins agglutinate red blood cells, inhibit protein synthesis in a cell-free system as well as in whole cells, and depurinate ribosomes and DNA, but not tRNA or poly(A). They are highly toxic to cells, in which they induce apoptosis and strongly inhibit protein synthesis, and to mice, with LD50s 8.16 mg/kg (lanceolin) and 2.76 mg/kg (stenodactylin) at 48 hours after administration. Thus, lanceolin and stenodactylin have all the properties of the toxic type 2 ribosomeinactivating proteins (RIPs). Further experiments were conducted in order to clarify the effects of these RIPs in cells. We investigated the cronological relationship between cytotoxic activity, indirectly evaluated as inhibition of protein synthesis, and loss of cell viability in NB100 cell line. The induction of apoptosis was assessed by determining caspases 3 and 7 levels, which increase 8-16 hours earlier than the beginning of protein synthesis inhibition. This suggest that the arrest of protein synthesis is not a central event in the pathway of cell poisoning by RIPs. The high toxicity and the induction of cell death only by apoptosis and not by necrosis in two muscular cell lines (TE671 and RD/18) suggest that lanceolin and stenodactylin may be potential candidates for experimental chemoablation in strabism and blepharospasm. These results show that lanceolin and stenodactylin are amongst the most potent toxins of plant origin.

Ribosome Biogenesis and cell cycle regulation: Effect of RNA Polymerase III inhibition

In cycling cells positive stimuli like nutrient, growth factors and mitogens increase ribosome biogenesis rate and protein synthesis to ensure both growth and proliferation. In contrast, under stress situation, proliferating cells negatively modulate ribosome production to reduce protein synthesis and block cell cycle progression. The main strategy used by cycling cell to coordinate cell proliferation and ribosome biogenesis is to share regulatory elements, which participate directly in ribosome production and in cell cycle regulation. In fact, there is evidence that stimulation or inhibition of cell proliferation exerts direct effect on activity of the RNA polymerases controlling the ribosome biogenesis, while several alterations in normal ribosome biogenesis cause changes of the expression and the activity of the tumor suppressor p53, the main effector of cell cycle progression inhibition. The available data on the cross-talk between ribosome biogenesis and cell proliferation have been until now obtained in experimental model in which changes in ribosome biogenesis were obtained either by reducing the activity of the RNA polymerase I or by down-regulating the expression of the ribosomal proteins. The molecular pathways involved in the relationship between the effect of the inhibition of RNA polymerase III (Pol III) activity and cell cycle progression have been not yet investigated. In eukaryotes, RNA Polymerase III is responsible for transcription of factors involved both in ribosome assembly (5S rRNA) and rRNA processing (RNAse P and MRP).Thus, the aim of this study is characterize the effects of the down-regulation of RNA Polymerase III activity, or the specific depletion of 5S rRNA. The results that will be obtained might lead to a deeper understanding of the molecular pathway that controls the coordination between ribosome biogenesis and cell cycle, and might give useful information about the possibility to target RNA Polymerase III for cancer treatment.