Nuove acquisizioni in termini di insufficienza mitralica: complicanze tromboemboliche dopo chirurgia della valvola mitrale: incidenza, predittori e implicazioni cliniche

Objectives: to define in patients undergoing surgery for mitral regurgitation (MR) the risk of thrombo-embolic complications, particularly ischemic stroke (IS) compared to that in the general population. Background: MR is frequent, occurs mostly in the elderly and guidelines recommend surgery in asymptomatic patients but IS risks are unknown. Methods: in 1344 patients (65±12 years) consecutively operated for MR (procedures: 897 valve repair, MRep; 447 valve replacement, 231 mechanical, MVRm; 216 biological, MVRb), thrombo-embolic complications particularly IS (diagnosed by a neurologist) during follow-up were assessed early (<30 days), mid-term (30-180 days) and long-term (180 days). Results: IS occurred in 130 patients and IS or transient ischemic attack in 201. IS rates were 1.9±0.4% and 2.7±0.5%, at 30 and 180 days and 8.1±0.8% at 5 years. IS rates were lowest after MRep vs. MVRb and MVRm (6.1±0.9, 8±2.1 and 16.1±2.7% at 5 years, p<0.001). Comparison to IS expected rates in the population showed high risk within 30 days of surgery (Risk-ratio 41[26-60], p<0.001 but p>0.10 between procedures) and moderate risk after 30 days (risk-ratio 1.7 overall, p<0.001; 1.3 for MRep, p=0.07; 0.98 for MVRb, p=0.95; 4.8 for MVRm, p<0.001). Beyond 180 days, IS risk declined further and was not different from the general population for MRep (1.2, p=0.30) and for MVRb (0.9, p=0.72). Risk of IS or transient ischemic attack was higher than the general population in all groups up to 180 days. The risk of bleeding beyond 30 days was lowest in MRep vs. MVRb and MVRm (7±1, 14±4 and 16±3% at 10 years, p<0.001). Conclusion: thrombo-embolic complications after MR surgery are both reason for concern and encouragement. IS risk is notable early, irrespective of the procedure performed, but long-term is not higher than in the general population after MRep and MVRb. Preference for MRep should be emphasized and trials aimed at preventing IS should be conducted to reduce the thrombo-embolic and hemorrhagic risk in patients undergoing surgery for MR.

Key issues in diagnosing and treating acute aortic syndromes: results from the metropolitan area of Bologna network

Background: Survival of patients with Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS) may relate to the speed of diagnosis. Diagnostic delay is exacerbated by non classical presentations such as myocardial ischemia or acute heart failure (AHF). However little is known about clinical implications and pathophysiological mechanisms of Troponin T elevation and AHF in AAS. Methods and Results: Data were collected from a prospective metropolitan AAS registry (398 patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2013). Troponin T values (either standard or high sensitivity assay, HS) were available in 248 patients (60%) of the registry population; the overall frequency of troponin positivity was 28% (ranging from 16% to 54%, using standard or HS assay respectively, p = 0.001). Troponin positivity was associated with a twofold increased risk of long in-hospital diagnostic time (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.05-3.52, p = 0.03), but not with in-hospital mortality. The combination of positive troponin and ACS-like ECG abnormalities resulted in a significantly increased risk of inappropriate therapy due to a misdiagnosis of ACS (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.12-5.54, p = 0.02). Patients with AHF were identified by the presence of dyspnea as presentation symptom or radiological signs of pulmonary congestion or cardiogenic shock. The overall frequency of AHF was 28 % (32% type A vs. 20% type B AAS, p = 0.01). AHF was due to a variety of pathophysiological mechanisms including cardiac tamponade (26%), aortic regurgitation (25%), myocardial ischemia (17%), hypertensive crisis (10%). AHF was associated with increased surgical delay and with increased risk of in-hospital death (adjusted OR 1.97 95% CI1.13-3.37,p=0.01). Conclusions: Troponin positivity (particularly HS) was a frequent finding in AAS. Abnormal troponin values were strongly associated with ACS-like ECG findings, in-hospital diagnostic delay, and inappropriate therapy. AHF was associated with increased surgical delay and was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as Bridge-to-Decision in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Background. A sizable group of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) can undergo neither surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) nor transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) because of clinical contraindications. The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a “bridge-to-decision” in selected patients with severe AS and potentially reversible contraindications to definitive treatment. Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 645 patients who underwent first BAV at our Institution between July 2007 and December 2012. Of these, the 202 patients (31.2%) who underwent BAV as bridge-to-decision (BTD) requiring clinical re-evaluation represented our study population. BTD patients were further subdivided in 5 groups: low left ventricular ejection fraction; mitral regurgitation grade ≥3; frailty; hemodynamic instability; comorbidity. The main objective of the study was to evaluate how BAV influenced the final treatment strategy in the whole BTD group and in its single specific subgroups. Results. Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 23.5±15.3%, mean age was 81±7 years. Mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47±17 mmHg to 33±14 mmHg. Of the 193 patients with BTD-BAV who received a second heart team evaluation, 72.5% were finally deemed eligible for definitive treatment (25.4%for AVR; 47.2% for TAVI): respectively, 96.7% of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction recovery; 70.5% of patients with mitral regurgitation reduction; 75.7% of patients who underwent BAV in clinical hemodynamic instability; 69.2% of frail patients and 68% of patients who presented relevant comorbidities. 27.5% of the study population was deemed ineligible for definitive treatment and treated with standard therapy/repeated BAV. In-hospital mortality was 4.5%, cerebrovascular accident occurred in 1% and overall vascular complications were 4% (0.5% major; 3.5% minor). Conclusions. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty should be considered as bridge-to-decision in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot be immediate candidates for definitive percutaneous or surgical treatment.