Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Magnetic Separation of Pollutants from Wastewater

This Thesys reports the study of a HGMS (High GradientMagnetic Separation) process for the treatment of industrialwastewaters that considers an assisted chemical-physical pre-treatment for the removal of heavy metals through the bound by adsorption with added iron-oxide particulate matter (hematite). The considered filter, constituted by ferromagnetic stainless steel wool and permanent magnets, is studied with a new approach based on a statistical analysis that requires the study of the trajectories of the particles. Experimental activity on a laboratory device has been carried out in order to test the model.

Theoretical and experimental study of novel hybrid composite and metal-composites interfaces

The growing demand for lightweight solutions in every field of engineering is driving the industry to seek new technological solutions to exploit the full potential of different materials. The combination of dissimilar materials with distinct property ranges embodies a transparent allocation of component functions while allowing an optimal mix of their characteristics. From both technological and design perspectives, the interaction between dissimilar materials can lead to severe defects that compromise a multi-material hybrid component's performance and its structural integrity. This thesis aims to develop methodologies for designing, manufacturing, and monitoring of hybrid metal-composite joints and hybrid composite components. In Chapter 1, a methodology for designing and manufacturing hybrid aluminum/composite co-cured tubes is assessed. In Chapter 2, a full-field methodology for fiber misalignment detection and stiffness prediction for hybrid, long fiber reinforced composite systems is shown and demonstrated. Chapter 3 reports the development of a novel technology for joining short fiber systems and metals in a one-step co-curing process using lattice structures. Chapter 4 is dedicated to a novel analytical framework for the design optimization of two lattice architectures.

Medical Malpractice in Public Healthcare Systems: An Empirical Investigation of Scheduled Damages

In the last decades, medical malpractice has been framed as one of the most critical issues for healthcare providers and health policy, holding a central role on both the policy agenda and public debate. The Law and Economics literature has devoted much attention to medical malpractice and to the investigation of the impact of malpractice reforms. Nonetheless, some reforms have been much less empirically studied as in the case of schedules, and their effects remain highly debated. The present work seeks to contribute to the study of medical malpractice and of schedules of noneconomic damages in a civil law country with a public national health system, using Italy as case study. Besides considering schedules and exploiting a quasi-experimental setting, the novelty of our contribution consists in the inclusion of the performance of the judiciary (measured as courts’ civil backlog) in the empirical analysis. The empirical analysis is twofold. First, it investigates how limiting compensations for pain and suffering through schedules impacts on the malpractice insurance market in terms of presence of private insurers and of premiums applied. Second, it examines whether, and to what extent, healthcare providers react to the implementation of this policy in terms of both levels and composition of the medical treatments offered. Our findings show that the introduction of schedules increases the presence of insurers only in inefficient courts, while it does not produce significant effects on paid premiums. Judicial inefficiency is attractive to insurers for average values of schedules penetration of the market, with an increasing positive impact of inefficiency as the territorial coverage of schedules increases. Moreover, the implementation of schedules tends to reduce the use of defensive practices on the part of clinicians, but the magnitude of this impact is ultimately determined by the actual degree of backlog of the court implementing schedules.

Seismotectonic study on two strategic infrastructures in Southern Italy

With the entry into force of the latest Italian Building Code (NTC 2008, 2018), innovative criteria were provided, especially for what concerns the seismic verifications of large infrastructures. In particular, for buildings considered as strategic, such as large dams, a seismotectonic study of the site was declared necessary, which involves a re-assessment of the basic seismic hazard. This PhD project fits into this context, being part of the seismic re-evaluation process of large dams launched on a national scale following the O.P.C.M. 3274/2003, D.L. 79/2004. A full seismotectonic study in the region of two large earth dams in Southern Italy was carried out. We identified and characterized the structures that could generate earthquakes in our study area, together with the definition of the local seismic history. This information was used for the reassessment of the basic seismic hazard, using probabilistic seismic hazard assessment approaches. In recent years, fault-based models for the seismic hazard assessment have been proposed all over the world as a new emerging methodology. For this reason, we decided to test the innovative SHERIFS approach on our study area. The occasion of the seismotectonic study gave also the opportunity to focus on the characteristics of the seismic stations that provided the data for the study itself. In the context of the work presented here, we focused on the 10 stations that had been active for the longest time and we carried out a geophysical characterization, the data of which merged into a more general study on the soil-structure interaction at seismic stations and on the ways in which it could affect the SHA. Lastly, an additional experimental study on the two dams and their associated minor structures is also presented, aimed at defining their main dynamic parameters, useful for subsequent dynamic structural and geotechnical studies.

Promuovere l'autovalutazione e il miglioramento delle strategie di apprendimento degli studenti internazionali cinesi: una ricerca empirica presso l'Università di Bologna

Nel quadro di alcuni filoni di ricerca inerenti alla promozione delle strategie cognitive, metacognitive e motivazionali degli studenti per una migliore efficacia del loro apprendimento (anche a livello universitario), il contributo presenta l’impianto e gli esiti di una ricerca empirica volta a indagare le percezioni degli studenti internazionali cinesi sulla loro esperienza universitaria in Italia, con un focus sulle eventuali difficoltà nell’adozione di un approccio autonomo e strategico all’apprendimento, e a sperimentare un intervento formativo messo a punto per sostenerli nel miglioramento del loro approccio all’apprendimento attraverso l’uso di procedure sistematiche di autoriflessione, self-recording e autovalutazione supportate dalla ricercatrice. Il disegno della ricerca è un quasi-esperimento a due gruppi con pre-test e post-test. Il campione è costituito da 60 studenti di diversi Dipartimenti dell’Università di Bologna che hanno partecipato volontariamente alla ricerca, di cui 30 hanno preso parte all’intervento. Gli strumenti utilizzati per la misurazione in ingresso e in uscita sono il Questionario sui Processi di Apprendimento e alcune scale del Questionario sulle Strategie di Apprendimento. Agli studenti del gruppo sperimentale è stato somministrato anche un questionario finale di valutazione del percorso formativo. Sono state inoltre effettuate alcune interviste a distanza di tempo come fase di follow up. Gli studenti in entrambi i gruppi affrontano sfide relative all’ambientamento nel contesto universitario italiano, con particolare riferimento a difficoltà linguistiche e di integrazione sociale. I principali fattori influenti sull’efficacia dello studio includono le barriere linguistiche, la gestione del tempo, la consapevolezza e l’uso delle strategie di studio. Nonostante emerga un miglioramento del gruppo sperimentale tra pre e post test, le differenze tra i due gruppi non sono risultate statisticamente significative. Tuttavia, i feedback forniti dagli studenti nel questionario di soddisfazione per il percorso formativo e nelle interviste post-intervento evidenziano percezioni positive sull’utilità del percorso, con benefici relativi al loro approccio allo studio.