Il Nilotinib nella terapia di prima linea della leucemia mieloide cronica

Background: Nilotinib is a potent and selective BCR-ABL inhibitor. The phase 3 ENESTnd trial demonstrated superior efficacy nilotinib vs imatinib, with higher and faster molecular responses. After 24 months, the rates of progression to accelerated-blastic phase (ABP) were 0.7% and 1.1% with nilotinib 300mg and 400mg BID, respectively, significantly lower compared to imatinib (4.2%). Nilotinib has been approved for the frontline treatment of Ph+ CML. With imatinib 400mg (IRIS trial), the rate of any event and of progression to ABP were higher during the first 3 years. Consequently, a confirmation of the durability of responses to nilotinib beyond 3 years is extremely important. Aims: To evaluate the response and the outcome of patients treated for 3 years with nilotinib 400mg BID as frontline therapy. Methods: A multicentre phase 2 trial was conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT00481052). Minimum 36-month follow-up data for all patients will be presented. Definitions: Major Molecular Response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0,1%IS; Complete Molecular Response (CMR): undetectable transcript levels with ≥10,000 ABL transcripts; failures: according to the revised ELN recommendations; events: failures and treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the analysis has been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: 73 patients enrolled: median age 51 years; 45% low, 41% intermediate and 14% high Sokal risk. The cumulative incidence of CCgR at 12 months was 100%. CCgR at each milestone: 78%, 96%, 96%, 95%, 92% at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. The overall estimated probability of MMR was 97%, while the rates of MMR at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52%, 66%, 85%, 81% and 82%, respectively. The overall estimated probability of CMR was 79%, while the rates of CMR at 12 and 24 months were 12% and 27%, respectively. No patient achieving a MMR progressed to AP. Only one patient progressed at 6 months to ABP and subsequently died (high Sokal risk, T315I mutation). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable with appropriate dose adaptations. During the first 12 months, the mean daily dose was 600-800mg in 74% of patients. The nilotinib last daily dose was as follows: 800mg in 46 (63%) patients, 600mg in 3 (4%) patients and 400mg in 18 (25%), 6 permanent discontinuations. Detail of discontinuation: 1 patient progressed to ABP; 3 patients had recurrent episodes of amylase and/or lipase increase (no pancreatitis); 1 patient had atrial fibrillation (unrelated to study drug) and 1 patient died after 32 months of mental deterioration and starvation (unrelated to study drug). Two patients are currently on imatinib second-line and 2 on dasatinib third-line. With a median follow-up of 39 months, the estimated probability of overall survival, progression-free survival and failure-free survival was 97%, the estimated probability of event-free survival was 91%. Conclusions: The rate of failures was very low during the first 3 years. Responses remain stable. The high rates of responses achieved during the first 12 months are being translated into optimal outcome for most of patients.

Pre-clinical and clinical development of leukemia stem cell inhibitors in acute leukemias

In Leukemias, recent developments have demonstrated that the Hedgehog pathway plays a key-role in the peculiar ability of self renewal of leukemia stem cells. The aim of this research activity was to investigate, through a first in man, Phase I, open label, clinical trial, the role and the impact, mainly in terms of safety profile, adverse events and pharmacokinetics, of a Sonic Hedgehog inhibitor compound on a population of heavely pretreated patients affected by AML, CML, MF, or MDS, resistant or refractory to standard chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients have been enrolled. The drug was administered orally, in 28 days cycles, without rest periods. The compound showed a good safety profile. The half life was of 17-35 hours, justifying the daily administration. Significant signs of activity, in terms of reduction of bone marrow blast cell amount were seen in most of the patients enrolled. Interestingly, correlative biological studies demonstrated that, comparing the gene expression profyiling signature of separated CD34+ cells before and after one cycle of treatment, the most variably expressed genes were involved in the Hh pathway. Moreover, we observed that many genes involved in MDR (multidrug resistance)were significantly down regulated after treatment. These data might lead to future clinical trials based on combinatory approaches, including, for instance, Hh inhibitors and conventional chemotherapy.

Caratterizzazione citogenetico-molecolare alla diagnosi di pazienti con leucemia mieloide cronica in fase cronica trattati con inibitori delle tirosinchinasi: ruolo prognostico.

L’applicazione della citogenetica convenzionale e molecolare può identificare: Ph-negatività, traslocazioni t(9;22) varianti e alterazioni citogenetiche addizionali (ACA) al cromsoma Ph in pazienti con LMC alla diagnosi. Prima dell’introduzione della terapia con Imatinib, esse mostravano un impatto prognostico negativo o non chiaro. Nel nostro studio, 6 casi di LMC Ph- erano trattati con Imatinib. La FISH identificava 4 casi con riarrangiamento BCR/ABL sul der(9q), 1 sul der(22q) e 1 su entrambi i derivativi. Quattro pazienti (66,7%) raggiungevano la RCgC, 2 fallivano il trattamento e 1 sottoposto a TMO. A causa dello scarso numero di casi, non era possibile nessuna correlazione con la prognosi. Nell’ambito di studi prospettici multicentrici del GIMEMA-WP, abbiamo valutato: traslocazioni varianti e ACA. Dei 559 pazienti arruolati, 30(5%) mostravano traslocazioni varianti, 24 valutabili in FISH: 18(75%) mostravano meccanismo 1-step, 4(16,7%) meccanismo 2-step e 2(8,3%) meccanismo complesso. Abbiamo confermato che le varianti non influenzano la risposta e la sopravvivenza dei pazienti trattati con Imatinib. Dei 378 pazienti valutabili alla diagnosi con citogenetica convenzionale, 21(5,6%) mostravano ACA: 9(43%) avevano la perdita del cromosoma Y, 3(14%) trisomia 8, 2(10%) trisomia 19, 6(28%) altre singole anomalie e 1 cariotipo complesso. La presenza di ACA influenzava la risposta: le RCgC e RMolM erano significativamente più basse rispetto al gruppo senza ACA e le curve di sopravvivenza EFS e FFS non erano significativamente diverse. Le curve di PFS e OS erano sovrapponibili nei due gruppi, per il basso numero di eventi avversi oppure perché alcuni raggiungevano la risposta con TKI di seconda generazione. Le anomalie “major route” mostravano decorso clinico peggiore, ma non è stato possibile determinare l’impatto prognostico in relazione al tipo di alterazione. Pertanto, le ACAs alla diagnosi rivestono un ruolo negativo nella prognosi dei pazienti trattati con Imatinib, che quindi rappresentano una categoria più a rischio per la risposta.