Characterization of new molecular targets involved in iodide flux in the thyroid gland: the anoctamins

Iodide transport is necessary for the synthesis of thyroid hormones following accumulation in the follicular lumen out of thyroid cells, via channels unknown with the exception of pendrin. According to our hypothesis, TMEM16A could be the main molecular identity of the channel mediating iodide efflux in the thyroid gland. TMEM16A is the prior candidate for calcium-activated chloride conductance (CaCC). TMEM16A belongs to the TMEM16/anoctamin family comprising ten members (TMEM16A-K). Higher affinity of TMEM16A for iodide and predicted expression in the thyroid gland suggest its mediation of iodide efflux. The aim of this project was to identify the role of TMEM16A in iodide transport in the thyroid gland, by characterizing its molecular expression and functional properties. We demonstrated that TMEM16F, H, K transcripts are expressed in FRTL-5 thyroid cells, as well as TMEM16A, which is TSH-independent. Tumor tissue from human thyroid maintains TMEM16A expression. Functional in vivo experiments in FRTL-5, stably expressing YFP-H148Q/I152L fluorescent protein as a biosensor, showed that iodide efflux is stimulated by agonists of purinergic receptors with an order of potency of ATP>UTP>ADP (compatible with an involvement of P2Y purinergic receptors), and by agonists of adrenergic receptors (epinephrine, norepinephrine and phenylephrine). Iodide efflux was blocked by α-receptor antagonists prazosin and phentolamine, consistent with a role of α1 adrenergic receptors. Iodide efflux was specifically dependent on calcium mobilized from intracellular compartments and induced by the calcium ionophore ionomycin. CaCC blockers suppressed ionomycin-/ATP-/epinephrine-stimulated iodide efflux. Heterologous expression of TMEM16A in CHO K1 cells induced calcium-activated iodide fluxes. All these results support the hypothesis of the involvement of TMEM16A in calcium-dependent iodide efflux induced by receptor agonists in thyroid cells. TMEM16A may represent a new pharmacological target for thyroid cancer therapy, since its blockade may enhance the retention of radioiodide by tumour cells enhancing the efficacy of radioablative therapy.

High sensitivity analysis of BRAF mutations in neoplastic and non-neoplastic thyroid lesions

The clonal distribution of BRAFV600E in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has been recently debated. No information is currently available about precursor lesions of PTCs. My first aim was to establish whether the BRAFV600E mutation occurs as a subclonal event in PTCs. My second aim was to screen BRAF mutations in histologically benign tissue of cases with BRAFV600E or BRAFwt PTCs in order to identify putative precursor lesions of PTCs. Highly sensitive semi-quantitative methods were used: Allele Specific LNA quantitative PCR (ASLNAqPCR) and 454 Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). For the first aim 155 consecutive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens of PTCs were analyzed. The percentage of mutated cells obtained was normalized to the estimated number of neoplastic cells. Three groups of tumors were identified: a first had a percentage of BRAF mutated neoplastic cells > 80%; a second group showed a number of BRAF mutated neoplastic cells < 30%; a third group had a distribution of BRAFV600E between 30-80%. The large presence of BRAFV600E mutated neoplastic cell sub-populations suggests that BRAFV600E may be acquired early during tumorigenesis: therefore, BRAFV600E can be heterogeneously distributed in PTC. For the second aim, two groups were studied: one consisted of 20 cases with BRAFV600E mutated PTC, the other of 9 BRAFwt PTCs. Seventy-five and 23 histologically benign FFPE thyroid specimens were analyzed from the BRAFV600E mutated and BRAFwt PTC groups, respectively. The screening of BRAF mutations identified BRAFV600E in “atypical” cell foci from both groups of patients. “Unusual” BRAF substitutions were observed in histologically benign thyroid associated with BRAFV600E PTCs. These mutations were very uncommon in the group with BRAFwt PTCs and in BRAFV600E PTCs. Therefore, lesions carrying BRAF mutations may represent “abortive” attempts at cancer development: only BRAFV600E boosts neoplastic transformation to PTC. BRAFV600E mutated “atypical foci” may represent precursor lesions of BRAFV600E mutated PTCs.