1 resultado para costs and benefits
em AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (4)
- Repository Napier (4)
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Aquatic Commons (14)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (16)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (30)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (52)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (31)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (94)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy - Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (23)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (18)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (7)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (10)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (43)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (192)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (11)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (18)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (13)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (147)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (28)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Traceability is often perceived by food industry executives as an additional cost of doing business, one to be avoided if possible. However, a traceability system can in fact comply the regulatory requirements, increase food safety and recall performance, improving marketing performances and, as well as, improving supply chain management. Thus, traceability affects business performances of firms in terms of costs and benefits determined by traceability practices. Costs and benefits affect factors such as, firms’ characteristics, level of traceability and ,lastly, costs and benefits perceived prior to traceability implementation. This thesis was undertaken to understand how these factors are linked to affect the outcome of costs and benefits. Analysis of the results of a plant level survey of the Italian ichthyic processing industry revealed that processors generally adopt various level of traceability while government support appears to increase the level of traceability and the expectations and actual costs and benefits. None of the firms’ characteristics, with the exception of government support, influences costs and level of traceability. Only size of firms and level of QMS certifications are linked with benefits while precision of traceability increases benefits without affecting costs. Finally, traceability practices appear due to the request from “external“ stakeholders such as government, authority and customers rather than “internal” factors (e.g. improving the firm management) while the traceability system does not provide any added value from the market in terms of price premium or market share increase.