1 resultado para constitutional referendums
em AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (50)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (31)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (11)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (107)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (6)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (29)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (126)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (61)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (3)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (16)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (83)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (6)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (80)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (159)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (10)
Resumo:
This dissertation seeks to improve the usage of direct democracy in order to minimize agency cost. It first explains why insights from corporate governance can help to improve constitutional law and then identifies relevant insights from corporate governance that can make direct democracy more efficient. To accomplish this, the dissertation examines a number of questions. What are the key similarities in corporate and constitutional law? Do these similarities create agency problems that are similar enough for a comparative analysis to yield valuable insights? Once the utility of corporate governance insights is established, the dissertation answers two questions. Are initiatives necessary to minimize agency cost if referendums are already provided for? And, must the results of direct democracy be binding in order for agency cost to be minimized?