Studio della patogenesi di HIV-1 nel compartimento osseo: effetti della terapia antiretrovirale convenzionale e nuovi approcci all'eradicazione

L’obiettivo della tesi è studiare il virus HIV-1 in relazione alle alterazioni sistemiche, riscontrate nel paziente HIV-infetto, in particolare alterazioni a carico del sistema scheletrico, indotte dal virus o dall’azione dei farmaci utilizzati nella terapia antiretrovirale (HAART). L’incidenza dell’osteoporosi nei pazienti HIV-positivi è drammaticamente elevata rispetto alla popolazione sana. Studi clinici hanno evidenziato come alcuni farmaci, ad esempio inibitori della proteasi virale, portino alla compromissione dell’omeostasi ossea, con aumento del rischio fratturativo. Il nostro studio prevede un follow-up di 12 mesi dall’inizio della HAART in una coorte di pazienti naïve, monitorando diversi markers ossei. I risultati ottenuti mostrano un incremento dei markers metabolici del turnover osseo, confermando l’impatto della HAART sull’omeostasi ossea. Successivamente abbiamo focalizzato la nostra attenzione sugli osteoblasti, il citotipo che regola la sintesi di nuova matrice ossea. Gli esperimenti condotti sulla linea HOBIT mettono in evidenza come il trattamento, in particolare con inibitori della proteasi, porti ad apoptosi nel caso in cui vi sia una concentrazione di farmaco maggiore di quella fisiologica. Tuttavia, anche concentrazioni fisiologiche di farmaci possono regolare negativamente alcuni marker ossei, come ALP e osteocalcina. Infine esiste la problematica dell’eradicazione di HIV-1 dai reservoirs virali. La HAART riesce a controllare i livelli viremici, ciononostante diversi studi propongono alcuni citotipi come potenziali reservoir di infezione, vanificando l’effetto della terapia. Abbiamo, perciò, sviluppato un nuovo approccio molecolare all’eradicazione: sfruttare l’enzima virale integrasi per riconoscere in modo selettivo le sequenze LTR virali per colpire il virus integrato. Fondendo integrasi e l’endonucleasi FokI, abbiamo generato diversi cloni. Questi sono stati transfettati stabilmente in cellule Jurkat, suscettibili all’infezione. Una volta infettate, abbiamo ottenuto una significativa riduzione dei markers di infezione. Successivamente la transfezione nella linea linfoblastica 8E5/LAV, che porta integrata nel genoma una copia di HIV, ha dato risultati molto incoraggianti, come la forte riduzione del DNA virale integrato.

Evaluation of Antitumoral activity of bone targeted drugs/conventional chemotherapies and identification of biomarkers for the selection of patients with breast cancer for the bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting

Bone metastases are responsible for different clinical complications defined as skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia, bone marrow infiltration and severe bone pain requiring palliative radiotherapy. The general aim of these three years research period was to improve the management of patients with bone metastases through two different approaches of translational research. Firstly in vitro preclinical tests were conducted on breast cancer cells and on indirect co-colture of cancer cells and osteoclasts to evaluate bone targeted therapy singly and in combination with conventional chemotherapy. The study suggests that zoledronic acid has an antitumor activity in breast cancer cell lines. Its mechanism of action involves the decrease of RAS and RHO, as in osteoclasts. Repeated treatment enhances antitumor activity compared to non-repeated treatment. Furthermore the combination Zoledronic Acid + Cisplatin induced a high antitumoral activity in the two triple-negative lines MDA-MB-231 and BRC-230. The p21, pMAPK and m-TOR pathways were regulated by this combined treatment, particularly at lower Cisplatin doses. A co-colture system to test the activity of bone-targeted molecules on monocytes-breast conditioned by breast cancer cells was also developed. Another important criticism of the treatment of breast cancer patients, is the selection of patients who will benefit of bone targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. A retrospective case-control study on breast cancer patients to find new predictive markers of bone metastases in the primary tumors was performed. Eight markers were evaluated and TFF1 and CXCR4 were found to discriminate between patients with relapse to bone respect to patients with no evidence of disease. In particular TFF1 was the most accurate marker reaching a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 79%. This marker could be a useful tool for clinicians to select patients who could benefit for bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting.

The "Orthoplastic" combined surgical approach to open tibia fractures: a multicentric prospective outcome study

Introduction: Open fractures of the leg represent a severe trauma. The combined approach, shared between plastic and orthopaedic surgeons, is considered to be important, although this multidisciplinary treatment is not routinely performed. Aim of this study was to verify whether the orthoplastic treatment is of any advantage over the traditional simply orthopedic treatment, through a multicentric inclusion of these unfrequent injuries into a prospective study. Material and methods: The following trauma centres were involved: Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute/University of Bologna (leading centre) and Maggiore Hospital (Bologna, Italy), Frenchay Hospital (Bristol, United Kingdom), Jinnah Hospital (Lahore, Pakistan). All patients consecutively hospitalized in the mentioned centres between January 2012 and December 2013 due to tibial open fractures were included in the study and prospectively followed up to December 2014. Demographics and other clinical features were recorded, including the type of treatment (orthopaedic or orthoplastic). The considered outcome measures included duration of hospitalization, time for bone union and soft tissue closure, Enneking score at 3, 6 and 12 months, the incidence of osteomyelitis and other complications. Results: A total of 164 patients were included in the study. Out of them 68% were treated with an orthoplastic approach, whereas 32% received a purely orthopedic treatment. All considered outcome measures showed to be improved by the orthoplastic approach, compared to the orthopaedic one: time for soft tissue closure (2 versus 25 weeks), duration of hospital stay (22 versus 55 days), time for bone union (6 versus 8.5 months) , number of additional operations (0.6 versus 1.2) and functional recovery of the limb at 12 months (27 versus 19, Enneking’s score). All results were statistically significant. Conclusion: The combined orthoplastic approach to the treatment of open tibia fractures, in particular for high grade injuries (Gustilo 3B), is proven to improve the outcome of these severe injuries.