Dark humour as a culture specific phenomenon: a study in screen translation

The present study aims at analyzing how dark humour as a cinematic genre travels cross-culturally through a specific mode of audiovisual translation, i.e. dubbing. In particular, it takes into consideration the processes involved in dubbing humour from English into Italian as observed in the English- and Italian-language versions of ten British and American dark comedies from the 1940s to the 2000s. In an attempt to identify some of the main mechanisms of the dark humour genre, the humorous content of the films was analyzed in terms of the elements on which specific scenes are based, mainly the non-verbal and verbal components. In the cases in which verbal elements were involved, i.e. the examples of verbally expressed humour, the analysis was concerned with whether they were adapted into Italian and to what effect. Quantification of the different kinds of dark humour revealed that in the sample of dark comedies verbal dark humour had a higher frequency (85.3%) than non-verbal dark humour (14.7%), which partially disconfirmed the first part of the research hypothesis. However, the significance of contextual elements in the conveying of dark humour, both in the form of Nsp VEH (54.31%) and V-V (V+VE) (21.68%), provided support for the hypothesis that, even when expressed verbally, dark humour is more closely linked to context-based rather than purely linguistic humour (4.9%). The second part of the analysis was concerned with an investigation of the strategies adopted for the translation of verbal dark humour elements from the SL (English) into the TL (Italian) through the filter of dubbing. Four translational strategies were identified as far as the rendering of verbal dark humour is concerned: i) complete omission; ii) weakening; iii) close rendering; and iv) increased effect. Complete omission was found to be the most common among these strategies, with 80.9% of dark humour examples being transposed in a way that kept the ST’s function substantially intact. Weakening of darkly humorous lines was applied in 12% of cases, whereas increased effect accounted for 4.6% and complete omission for 2.5%. The fact that for most examples of Nsp VEH (84.9%) and V-AC (V+VE) (91.4%) a close rendering effect was observed and that 12 out of 21 examples of V-AC (PL) (a combined 57%) were either omitted or weakened seemed to confirm, on the one hand, the complexity of the translation process required by cases of V-AC (PL) and V-AC (CS). On the other hand, as suggested in the second part of the research hypothesis, the data might be interpreted as indicating that lesser effort on the translator/adaptor’s part is involved in the adaptation of V-AC (Nsp VEH) and V-V (V+VE). The issue of the possible censorial intervention undergone by examples of verbal dark humour in the sample still remains unclear.

Kissing stenting of aortic bifurcation for aorto-iliac obstructive disease: a comparison between bare metal stents and covered stents

INTRODUCTION Aim of this multicentric study:to compare the short-and mid-term results of bare metal stents(BMS)and covered stents(CS)in the Kissing Stent(KS)technique. METHODS Patients undertaking a KS with BMS or CS between January 2017-August 2021 included. Morphological features of plaques were classified as per the extension of calcifications and thrombosis. Every endpoint and outcome was compared in relation to BMS or CS. All patients included received dual anti-platelets DAPT)for at least one month. RESULTS Thirty-four patients enrolled,17 treated with BMS and 17 with CS. Average age 66 years. The 80% of patients were part of TASC C-D categories. DAPT was administered to 82.4%(28/34)of patients with a mean duration of 4.4±1.6 months. Mean follow-up 32.1±17.8 months. Technical Success was 100%. Immediate Clinical Success was reached in 29 cases(85.3%). Immediate and 30-day Clinical Success was higher in CS(64.7% vs 100%, p=.01). Overall Clinical Success at 1-year follow-up was 91.2%,and resulted significantly higher in CS(82.4% vs 100%,p .04). Overall Primary Patency,Assisted Patency,and Secondary Patency at 30 days were 97.1%,97.1%,and 100%,without differences between BMS and CS(94.1% vs 100%,94.1% vs 100%,and 100% vs 100%;p =.7). Two cases(5.9%)of thrombosis were registered,and both occurred within 3 months after the procedure and both in the BMS,without statistical differences with the CS group(11.8% vs 0%,p .48). Both cases of thrombosis occurred in patients who were not treated with dual antiplatelet therapy(33.3% vs 0%,p .027). Survival statistically differed only at the mean follow-up in favour of CS(70.6% and 100%,p .04). CONCLUSIONS The endovascular approach is currently safe and effective in the treatment of AIOD,and KS offers excellent results in particular if performed with CS; however,no statistically significant differences emerged between the two types of stents in terms of patency,reintervention,and complications. DAPT seems to warrant the best results in terms of patency,although there is still no consensus about the ideal duration of administration.