Guidelines of Special Care Dentistry in Patients with Chromosomal and Genetic syndromes

Chromosomal and genetic syndromes are frequently associated with dental and cranio-facial alterations. The aim of our study is to identify and describe the dental and craniofacial alterations typical of six genetic and chromosomal syndromes examined. Materials and Methods- A dental visit was performed to 195 patients referred from Sant’Orsola Hospital of Bologna, University of Bologna, to Service of Special Need Dentistry, Dental Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna. The patients recruited were 137 females and 58 males, in an age range of 3-49 years (mean age of 13.8±7.4). The total sample consisted of subjects affected with Down Syndrome (n=133), Familiar Hypophosphatemic Ricket (n=10), Muscular Dystrophies (n=12), Noonan Syndrome (n=13), Turner Syndrome (n=17), Williams Syndrome(n=10). A questionnaire regarding detailed medical and dental history, oral health and dietary habits, was filled by parents/caregivers, or patients themselves when possible. The intra-oral and extra-oral examination valued the presence of facial asymmetries, oral habits, dental and skeletal malocclusions, dental formula, dental anomalies, Plaque Index (Silness&LÖe Index), caries prevalence (dmft/DMFT index), gingivitis and periodontal disease, and mucosal lesions. Radiographic examinations (Intraoral radiographies, Orthopanoramic, Skull teleradiography) were executed according to patient’s age and treatment planning. A review of literature about each syndrome and its dental and cranio-facial characteristics and about caries, hygiene status and malocclusion prevalence on syndromic and non-syndromic population was performed. Results - The data of all the patients were collected in the “Data Collection Tables” created for each syndrome. General anamnesis information, oral hygiene habits and dmft/DMFT, PI, malocclusion prevalence were calculated and compared to syndromic and non-syndromic population results found in literature. Discussions and conclusions - Guidelines of Special Care dentistry were indicated for each syndrome, in relation to each syndrome features and individual patient characteristics.

Multi-Principal Agency and the Compliance with Professional Guidelines in Health Systems: Economic and Regulatory Perspectives

Amid the trend of rising health expenditure in developed economies, changing the healthcare delivery models is an important point of action for service regulators to contain this trend. Such a change is mostly induced by either financial incentives or regulatory tools issued by the regulators and targeting service providers and patients. This creates a tripartite interaction between service regulators, professionals, and patients that manifests a multi-principal agent relationship, in which professionals are agents to two principals: regulators and patients. This thesis is concerned with such a multi-principal agent relationship in healthcare and attempts to investigate the determinants of the (non-)compliance to regulatory tools in light of this tripartite relationship. In addition, the thesis provides insights into the different institutional, economic, and regulatory settings, which govern the multi-principal agent relationship in healthcare in different countries. Furthermore, the thesis provides and empirically tests a conceptual framework of the possible determinants of (non-)compliance by physicians to regulatory tools issued by the regulator. The main findings of the thesis are first, in a multi-principal agent setting, the utilization of financial incentives to align the objectives of professionals and the regulator is important but not the only solution. This finding is based on the heterogeneity in the financial incentives provided to professionals in different health markets, which does not provide a one-size-fits-all model of financial incentives to influence clinical decisions. Second, soft law tools as clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are important tools to mitigate the problems of the multi-principal agent setting in health markets as they reduce information asymmetries while preserving the autonomy of professionals. Third, CPGs are complex and heterogeneous and so are the determinants of (non-)compliance to them. Fourth, CPGs work but under conditions. Factors such as intra-professional competition between service providers or practitioners might lead to non-compliance to CPGs – if CPGs are likely to reduce the professional’s utility. Finally, different degrees of soft law mandate have different effects on providers’ compliance. Generally, the stronger the mandate, the stronger the compliance, however, even with a strong mandate, drivers such as intra-professional competition and co-management of patients by different professionals affected the (non-)compliance.