Functional and neural mechanisms of intertemporal choice

People are daily faced with intertemporal choice, i.e., choices differing in the timing of their consequences, frequently preferring smaller-sooner rewards over larger-delayed ones, reflecting temporal discounting of the value of future outcomes. This dissertation addresses two main goals. New evidence about the neural bases of intertemporal choice is provided. Following the disruption of either the medial orbitofrontal cortex or the insula, the willingness to wait for larger-delayed outcomes is affected in odd directions, suggesting the causal involvement of these areas in regulating the value computation of rewards available with different timings. These findings were also supported by a reported imaging study. Moreover, this dissertation provides new evidence about how temporal discounting can be modulated at a behavioral level through different manipulations, e.g., allowing individuals to think about the distant time, pairing rewards with aversive events, or changing their perceived spatial position. A relationship between intertemporal choice, moral judgements and aging is also discussed. All these findings link together to support a unitary neural model of temporal discounting according to which signals coming from several cortical (i.e., medial orbitofrontal cortex, insula) and subcortical regions (i.e., amygdala, ventral striatum) are integrated to represent the subjective value of both earlier and later rewards, under the top-down regulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The present findings also support the idea that the process of outcome evaluation is strictly related to the ability to pre-experience and envision future events through self-projection, the anticipation of visceral feelings associated with receiving rewards, and the psychological distance from rewards. Furthermore, taking into account the emotions and the state of arousal at the time of decision seems necessary to understand impulsivity associated with preferring smaller-sooner goods in place of larger-later goods.

Cognitive and behavioural assessment of parkinsonian syndromes at onset: a longitudinal study

Background: cognitive impairment is one of the non motor features widely descripted in parkinsonian syndrome, it has been related to the motor characteristics of the parkinsonian syndrome, associated with neuropsychiatric dysfunction and the characteristic sleep and autonomic features. It has been shown to be highly prevalent at all disease stages and to contribute significantly to disability. Objectives: aim of this study is to evaluate longitudinally the cognitive and behavioral characteristics of patients with a parkinsonian syndrome at onset; to describe the cognitive and behavioral characteristics of each parkinsonian syndrome; to define in PD patients at onset the presence of MCI or Parkinson disease dementia; to correlate the cognitive and behavioral characteristics with the features of the parkinsonian syndrome and with the associated sleep and autonomic features. Results: we recruited 55 patients, 22 did not present cognitive impairment both at T0 and at T1. 18 patients presented a progression of cognitive impairment. Progressive cognitively impaired patients were older and presented the worst motor phenotype. Progression of cognitive impairment was not associated to sleep and autonomic features. Conclusion: the evaluation of cognitive impairment could not be useful as a predictor of a correct diagnosis but each non motor domain will help to clarify and characterize the motor syndrome. The diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders lies in building a clinical profile in conjunction with other clinical characteristics such as mode of presentation, disease progression, response to medications, sleep and autonomic features.