Apnea e reflusso gastroesofageo nel neonato pretermine

Objective: To document the existence of a relationship between apnea of prematurity (AOP) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in preterm infants. Setting: One Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Patients: Twenty-six preterm infants (gestational age<32 weeks) with recurrent apneas. Intervention: Simultaneous and synchronized recording of polysomnography and pH-impedance monitoring (pH-MII). Polysomnography detects and characterizes apneas, by recording of breathing movement, nasal airflow, electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter saturation. pH-MII is the state-of-theart methodology for GER detection in preterm newborns. Main outcome measures: Relationship between AOP and GER, which were considered temporally related if both started within 30 seconds of each other. Results: One-hundred-fifty-four apneas out of 1136 were temporally related to GER. The frequency of apnea during the one-minute time around the onset of GER was significantly higher than the one detected in the GER-free period (p=0.03). Furthermore, the frequency of apnea in the 30 seconds after GER (GER-triggered apneas) was greater than that detected in the 30 seconds before (p=0.01). A great inter-individual variability was documented in the proportion of GERtriggered apneas. A strong correlation between total number of apneas and the difference between apneas detected 30 seconds after and before GER was found (p=0.034). Conclusions: Our data show that a variable rate of apneas can be triggered by GER in very preterm infant. Further studies are needed to recognise clinical features which identify those patients who are more susceptible to GER-triggered apneas.

Validazione e applicazioni cliniche della metodica NIRA (Near Infrared Reflectance Analysis) per la valutazione del contenuto nutrizionale del latte materno in terapia intensiva neonatale

Phase 1: To validate Near-Infrared Reflectance Analysis (NIRA) as a fast, reliable and suitable method for routine evaluation of human milk’s nitrogen and fat content. Phase 2: To determine whether fat content, protein content and osmolality of HM before and after fortification may affect gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in symptomatic preterm infants. Patients and Methods: Phase 1: 124 samples of expressed human milk (55 from preterm mothers and 69 from term mothers) were used to validate NIRA against traditional methods (Gerber method for fat and Kjeldhal method for nitrogen). Phase 2: GER was evaluated in 17 symptomatic preterm newborns fed naïve and fortified HM by combined pH/intraluminal-impedance monitoring (pH-MII). HM fat and protein content was analysed by a Near-Infrared-Reflectance-Analysis (NIRA). HM osmolality was tested before and after fortification. GER indexes measured before and after fortification were compared, and were also related with HM fat and protein content and osmolality before and after fortification. Results: Phase 1: · A strong agreement was found between traditional methods’ and NIRA’s results (expressed as g/100 g of milk), both for fat and nitrogen content in term (mean fat content: NIRA=2.76; Gerber=2.76; mean nitrogen content: NIRA=1.88; Kjeldhal =1.92) and preterm (mean fat content: NIRA=3.56; Kjeldhal=3.52; mean nitrogen content: NIRA=1.91; Kjeldhal =1.89) mother’s milk. · Nitrogen content of the milk samples, measured by NIRA, ranged from 1.18 to 2.71 g/100 g of milk in preterm milk and from 1.48 to 2.47 in term milk; fat content ranged from 1.27 to 6.23 g/100 g of milk in preterm milk and from 1.01 to 6.01 g/100 g of milk in term milk. Phase 2: · An inverse correlation was found between naïve HM protein content and acid reflux index (RIpH: p=0.041, rho=-0.501). · After fortification, osmolality often exceeded the values recommended for infant feeds; furthermore, a statistically significant (p<.05) increase in non acid reflux indexes was observed. Conclusions: NIRA can be used as a fast, reliable and suitable tool for routine monitoring of macronutrient content of human milk. Protein content of naïve HM may influence acid GER in preterm infants. A standard fortification of HM may worsen non acid GER indexes and, due to the extreme variability in HM composition, may overcome both recommended protein intake and HM osmolality. Thus, an individualized fortification, based on the analysis of the composition of naïve HM, could optimize both nutrient intake and feeding tolerance.

Analisi proteomica dei meccanismi sottesi alla malatia da reflusso gastroesofageo

La malattia da reflusso gastroesofageo (GERD) si divide in due categorie: malattia non erosiva (NERD) ed erosiva (ERD). Questi due fenotipi di GERD mostrano caratteristiche patofisiologiche e cliniche differenti. NERD è la forma più comune. Anche se ERD e NERD sono difficili da distinguere a livello clinico, la forma NERD possiede caratteristiche fisiologiche, patofisiologiche, anatomiche, e istologiche uniche. La replicazione cellulare dello strato basale si pensa sia una delle cause implicate nella resistenza della mucosa e nella difesa strutturale dell’epitelio. Diversi studi hanno dimostrato che la proliferazione cellulare è ridotta nella mucosa esofagea esposta ad insulti acidi e peptici cronici, in pazienti GERD, in più uno studio recente ha dimostrato che il recettore per i cannabinoidi CB1 era implicato nella riparazione delle ferite nella mucosa del colon. Sulla base di questi dati abbiamo valutato la presenza del recettore CB1 in biopsie della mucosa esofagea, di pazienti ERD, NERD e di controlli sani, tramite analisi Western Blot, Immunoistochimica e Real-Time PCR, dimostrando per la prima volta la presenza di questo recettore nell’epitelio dell’esofago e una riduzione dei suoi livelli di espressione nei pazienti ERD, camparati con i NERD e con i controlli sani. Successivamente, per chiarire meglio i meccanismi molecolari che caratterizzano ERD e NERD, abbiamo effettuato un analisi proteomica con la tecnica shotgun, la quale ha evidenziato un patter proteico di 33 proteine differenzialmente espresse in pazienti NERD vs ERD, sette delle quali confermate in wester Blot, e quattro in immunoistochimica. Concludendo i nostri risultati hanno confermato che ERD e NERD sono due entità distinte a livello proteico, e hanno proposto dei candidati biomarker per la diagnosi differenziale di ERD e NERD.