Accuratezza nella diagnosi prenatale di malformazione fetale

OBJECTIVE: One major problem in counselling couples with a prenatal diagnosis of a correctable fetal anomaly is the ability to exclude associated malformations that may modify the prognosis. Our aim was to assess the precision of fetal sonography in identifying isolated malformations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the prenatal and postnatal records of our center for cases with a prenatal diagnosis of an isolated fetal anomaly in the period 2002-2007. RESULTS: The antenatal diagnosis of an isolated malformation was made in 284 cases. In one of this cases the anomaly disappeared in utero. Of the remaining cases, the prenatal diagnosis was confirmed after birth in 251 (88.7%). In 8 fetuses (7 with a suspected coarctation of the aorta, 1 with ventricular septal defect) the prenatal diagnosis was not confirmed. In 24 fetuses (8.5%) additional malformations were detected at postnatal or post-mortem. In 16 of these cases the anomalies were mild or would not have changed the prognosis. In 8 cases (2.8%) severe anomalies were present (1 hypoplasia of the corpus callosum with ventriculomegaly, 1 tracheal agenesis, 3 cases with multiple anomalies, 1 Opitz Syndrome, 1 with CHARGE Syndrome, 1 COFS Syndrome). Two of these infants died. CONCLUSIONS: the prenatal diagnosis of an isolated fetal anomaly is highly reliable. However, the probability that additional malformations will go undetected albeit small remains tangible. In our experience, it was 2.8%.

A simple voltage/mass index increases the suspicion of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy: an electrocardiographic and echocardiographic study of 767 patients with increased left ventricular wall thickness due to different causes

Background-Amyloidotic cardiomyopathy (AC) can mimic true left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and hypertensive heart disease (HHD). We assessed the diagnostic value of combined electrocardiographic/echocardiographic indexes to identify AC among patients with increased echocardiographic LV wall thickness due to either different etiologies of amyloidosis or HCM or HHD. Method-First, we studied 469 consecutive patients: 262 with biopsy/genetically proven AC (with either AL or transthyretin (TTR)-related amyloidosis); 106 with HCM; 101 with HHD. We compared the diagnostic performance of: low QRS voltage, symmetric LVH, low QRS voltage plus interventricular septal thickness >1.98 cm, Sokolow index divided by the cross-sectional area of LV wall, Sokolow index divided by body surface area indexed LV mass (LVMI), Sokolow index divided by LV wall thickness, Sokolow index divided by (LV wall/height^2.7); peripheral QRS score divided by LVMI, Peripheral QRS score divided by LV wall thickness, Peripheral QRS score divided by LV wall thickness indexed to height^2.7, total QRS score divided by LVMI, total QRS score divided by LV wall thickness; total QRS score divided by (LV wall/height^2.7). We tested each criterion, separately in males and females, in the following settings: AC vs. HCM+HHD; AC vs. HCM; AL vs. HCM+HHD; AL vs. HCM; TTR vs. HCM+HHD; TTR vs. HCM. Results-Low QRS voltage showed high specificity but low sensitivity for the identification of AC. All the combined indexes had a higher diagnostic accuracy, being total QRS score divided by LV wall thickness or by LVMI associated with the best performances and the largest areas under the ROC curve. These results were validated in 298 consecutive patients with AC, HCM or HHD. Conclusions-In patients with increased LV wall thickness, a combined ECG/ echocardiogram analysis provides accurate indexes to non-invasively identify AC. Total QRS score divided by LVMI or LV wall thickness offers the best diagnostic performance.

Relationship between aetiology and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common cardiac disease caused by a range of genetic and acquired disorders. The most common cause is genetic variation in sarcomeric proteins genes. Current ESC guidelines suggest that particular clinical features (‘red flags’) assist in differential diagnosis. Aims: To test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in the presence of increased wall thickness is an age-specific ‘red flag’ for aetiological diagnosis and to determine long-term outcomes in adult patients with various types of HCM. Methods: A cohort of 1697 adult patients with HCM followed at two European referral centres were studied. Aetiological diagnosis was based on clinical examination, cardiac imaging and targeted genetic and biochemical testing. Main outcomes were: all-cause mortality or heart transplantation (HTx) and heart failure (HF) related-death. All-cause mortality included sudden cardiac death or equivalents, HF and stroke-related death and non-cardiovascular death. Results: Prevalence of different aetiologies was as follows: sarcomeric HCM 1288 (76%); AL amyloidosis 115 (7%), hereditary TTR amyloidosis 86 (5%), Anderson-Fabry disease 85 (5%), wild-type TTR amyloidosis 48 (3%), Noonan syndrome 15 (0.9%), mitochondrial disease 23 (1%), Friedreich’s ataxia 11 (0.6%), glycogen storage disease 16 (0.9%), LEOPARD syndrome 7 (0.4%), FHL1 2 (0.1%) and CPT II deficiency 1 (0.1%). Systolic dysfunction at first evaluation was significantly more frequent in phenocopies than sarcomeric HCM [105/409 (26%) versus 40/1288 (3%), (p<0.0001)]. All-cause mortality/HTx and HF-related death were higher in phenocopies compared to sarcomeric HCM (p<0.001, respectively). When considering specific aetiologies, all-cause mortality and HF-related death were higher in cardiac amyloidosis (p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Systolic dysfunction at first evaluation is more common in phenocopies compared to sarcomeric HCM representing an age-specific ‘red flag’ for differential diagnosis. Long-term prognosis was more severe in phenocopies compared to sarcomeric HCM and when comparing specific aetiologies, cardiac amyloidosis showed the worse outcomes.