Generation and characterization of mouse models of Small cell lung cancer and Basal cell carcinoma for the preclinical evaluation of new therapies

Background. Human small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounting for approximately 15-20% of all lung cancers, is an aggressive tumor with high propensity for early regional and distant metastases. Although the initial tumor rate response to chemotherapy is very high, SCLC relapses after approximately 4 months in ED and 12 months in LD. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent cancer in the western world, and its incidence is increasing worldwide. This type of cancer rarely metastasizes and the death rate is extraordinary low. Surgery is curative for most of the patients, but for those that develop locally advanced or metastatic BCC there is currently no effective treatment. Both types of cancer have been deeply investigated and genetic alterations, MYCN amplification (MA) among the most interesting, have been found. These could become targets of new pharmacological therapies. Procedures. We created and characterized novel BLI xenograft orthotopic mouse models of SCLC to evaluate the tumor onset and progression and the efficacy of new pharmacological strategies. We compared an in vitro model with a transgenic mouse model of BCC, to investigate and delineate the canonical HH signalling pathway and its connections with other molecular pathways. Results and conclusions. The orthotopic models showed latency and progression patterns similar to human disease. Chemotherapy treatments improved survival rates and validated the in vivo model. The presence of MA and overexpression were confirmed in each model and we tested the efficacy of a new MYCN inhibitor in vitro. Preliminar data of BCC models highlighted Hedgehog pathway role and underlined the importance of both in vitro and in vivo strategies to achieve a better understanding of the pathology and to evaluate the applicability of new therapeutic compounds

Rural governance and livelihoods systems diversification in the Western Balkans: comparative case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia

Agriculture is still important for socio-economic development in rural areas of Bosnia, Montenegro and Serbia (BMS). However, for sustainable rural development rural economies should be diversified so attention should be paid also to off-farm and non-farm income-generating activities. Agricultural and rural development (ARD) processes and farm activity diversification initiatives should be well governed. The ultimate objective of this work is to explore linkages between ARD governance and rural livelihoods diversification in BMS. The thesis is based on an extended secondary data analysis and surveys. Questionnaires for ARD governance and coordination were sent via email to public, civil society and international organizations. Concerning rural livelihood diversification, the field questionnaire surveys were carried out in three rural regions of BMS. Results show that local rural livelihoods are increasingly diversified but a significant share of households are still engaged in agriculture. Diversification strategies have a chance to succeed taking into consideration the three rural regions’ assets. However, rural households have to tackle many problems for developing new income-generating activities such as the lack of financial resources. Weak business skills are also a limiting factor. Fully exploiting rural economy diversification potential in BMS requires many interventions including improving rural governance, enhancing service delivery in rural areas, upgrading rural people’s human capital, strengthening rural social capital and improving physical capital, access of the rural population to finance as well as creating a favourable and enabling legal and legislative environment fostering diversification. Governance and coordination of ARD policy design, implementation and evaluation is still challenging in the three Balkan countries and this has repercussions also on the pace of rural livelihoods diversification. Therefore, there is a strong and urgent need for mobilization of all rural stakeholders and actors through appropriate governance arrangements in order to foster rural livelihoods diversification and quality of life improvement.