Interactions between normative systems and software cognitive agents. A formalization in temporal modal defeasible logic and its implementation

Sustainable computer systems require some flexibility to adapt to environmental unpredictable changes. A solution lies in autonomous software agents which can adapt autonomously to their environments. Though autonomy allows agents to decide which behavior to adopt, a disadvantage is a lack of control, and as a side effect even untrustworthiness: we want to keep some control over such autonomous agents. How to control autonomous agents while respecting their autonomy? A solution is to regulate agents’ behavior by norms. The normative paradigm makes it possible to control autonomous agents while respecting their autonomy, limiting untrustworthiness and augmenting system compliance. It can also facilitate the design of the system, for example, by regulating the coordination among agents. However, an autonomous agent will follow norms or violate them in some conditions. What are the conditions in which a norm is binding upon an agent? While autonomy is regarded as the driving force behind the normative paradigm, cognitive agents provide a basis for modeling the bindingness of norms. In order to cope with the complexity of the modeling of cognitive agents and normative bindingness, we adopt an intentional stance. Since agents are embedded into a dynamic environment, things may not pass at the same instant. Accordingly, our cognitive model is extended to account for some temporal aspects. Special attention is given to the temporal peculiarities of the legal domain such as, among others, the time in force and the time in efficacy of provisions. Some types of normative modifications are also discussed in the framework. It is noteworthy that our temporal account of legal reasoning is integrated to our commonsense temporal account of cognition. As our intention is to build sustainable reasoning systems running unpredictable environment, we adopt a declarative representation of knowledge. A declarative representation of norms will make it easier to update their system representation, thus facilitating system maintenance; and to improve system transparency, thus easing system governance. Since agents are bounded and are embedded into unpredictable environments, and since conflicts may appear amongst mental states and norms, agent reasoning has to be defeasible, i.e. new pieces of information can invalidate formerly derivable conclusions. In this dissertation, our model is formalized into a non-monotonic logic, namely into a temporal modal defeasible logic, in order to account for the interactions between normative systems and software cognitive agents.

Essays in Environmental Economics

This dissertation comprises four essays on the topic of environmental economics and industrial organization. In the first essay, we develop a two-country world differential game model with a polluting firm in each country to investigate the equilibrium of the game between firms when they decide to trade or not and to see under which conditions social welfare coincides with the market equilibrium. In the second essay, we built a model where firms strategically choose whether to participate in an auction/lottery to attain pollution permits, or instead invest in green R&D, to show that, somewhat counterintuitively, a desirable side effect of the auction is in fact that of fostering environmental R&D in an admissible range of the model parameters. The third essay investigates a second-best trade agreement between two countries when pollution spillovers are asymmetric to examine the strategic behavior of governments in using pollution taxes and tariffs under trade liberalization. The fouth essay studies the profitability of exogenous output constraint in a differential game model with price dynamics under the feedback strategies.

In vitro characterisation and expansion of human regulatory T cells for their in vivo application in the induction of tolerance in haematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is considered the treatment of choice for many end-stage organ diseases. Thus far, short term results are excellent, with patient survival rates greater than 90% one year post-surgery, but there are several problems with the long term acceptance and use of immunosuppressive drugs. Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation (HSCT) concerns the infusion of haematopoietic stem cells to re-establish acquired and congenital disorders of the hematopoietic system. The main side effect is the Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) where donor T cells can cause pathology involving the damage of host tissues. Patients undergoing acute or chronic GvHD receive immunosuppressive regimen that is responsible for several side effects. The use of immunosuppressive drugs in the setting of SOT and GvHD has markedly reduced the incidence of acute rejection and the tissue damage in GvHD however, the numerous adverse side effects observed boost the development of alternative strategies to improve the long-term outcome. To this effect, the use of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) as a cellular therapy is an attractive approach for autoimmunity disease, GvHD and limiting immune responses to allograft after transplantation. Treg have a pivotal role in maintaining peripheral immunological tolerance, by preventing autoimmunity and chronic inflammation. Results of my thesis provide the characterization and cell processing of Tregs from healthy controls and patients in waiting list for liver transplantation, followed by the development of an efficient expansion-protocol and the investigation of the impact of the main immunosuppressive drugs on viability, proliferative capacity and function of expanded cells after expansion. The conclusion is that ex vivo expansion is necessary to infuse a high Treg dose and although many other factors in vivo can contribute to the success of Treg therapy, the infusion of Tregs during the administration of the highest dose of immunosuppressants should be carefully considered.

Effects of glyphosate and Roundup upon mammalian gametes

The wide use of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) has become a controversial issue due to the potential harmful effects on human health. Commercial formulations, among which Roundup is the most famous one, contain a number of adjuvants inside; most of these are patented and not publicly known, therefore, they can act differently from glyphosate alone and might strengthen its toxic effect. Our study is focused on GBHs reproductive toxicity with a special regard to glyphosate and Roundup impact on male and female mammalian gametes after exposure to concentrations ranging from the one recommended for agricultural use (0.1% Roundup, containing 360 µg/mL glyphosate) to 70-fold lower or more. Sperm quality analysis, either on boar and stallion, showed that Roundup has much more detrimental impact than glyphosate at equivalent concentrations on spermatozoa function and survival. Basing on our results, the toxic effect of these pesticides on spermatozoa may be linked to an impairment in mitochondrial activity and a subsequent decrease in ATP production and/or alterations in the redox balance, which impact cell motility and plasma membrane stability. Moreover, a different species sensitivity to GBHs may exists as high doses of glyphosate affected sperm quality only in boar and not in stallion; furthermore, Roundup had deleterious effects at lower doses in the first compared to the latter. With regard to female gametes, we found that glyphosate and Roundup exposure during IVM detrimentally affect the subsequent developmental ability of swine embryos, providing further evidence of their potential toxic effect on female reproductive system. In addition, Roundup altered steroidogenesis and increased oocyte ROS levels. Therefore, according to our results, we can conclude that GBHs exert a negative impact on both male and female gametes and that Roundup adjuvants enhance glyphosate toxic effects and/or are biologically active in their side-effect.

Essays on Atypicality: A narrative perspective to illuminate how atypical actors can counter the disciplining effect of categories

Using Big Data and Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools, this dissertation investigates the narrative strategies that atypical actors can leverage to deal with the adverse reactions they often elicit. Extensive research shows that atypical actors, those who fail to abide by established contextual standards and norms, are subject to skepticism and face a higher risk of rejection. Indeed, atypical actors combine features and behaviors in unconventional ways, thereby generating confusion in the audience and instilling doubts about their propositions' legitimacy. However, the same atypicality is often cited as the precursor to socio-cultural innovation and a strategic act to expand the capacity for delivering valued goods and services. Contextualizing the conditions under which atypicality is celebrated or punished has been a significant theoretical challenge for scholars interested in reconciling this tension. Nevertheless, prior work has focused on audience side factors or on actor-side characteristics that are only scantily under an actor's control (e.g., status and reputation). This dissertation demonstrates that atypical actors can use strategically crafted narratives to mitigate against the audience’s negative response. In particular, when atypical actors evoke conventional features in their story, they are more likely to overcome the illegitimacy discount usually applied to them. Moreover, narratives become successful navigational devices for atypicality when atypical actors use a more abstract language. This simplifies classification and provides the audience with more flexibility to interpret and understand them.

Preclinical studies of the combined effect of anti-MYCN PNA and Retinoic Acid as potential approach to treat Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the deadliest cancer in early childhood. Around 25% of patients pre- sent MYCN-amplification (MNA) which is linked to poor prognosis, metastasis, and therapy- resistance. While retinoic acid (RA) is beneficial only for some NB patients, the cause of its resistance is still unknown. Thus, there remains a need for new therapies to treat NB. I show that MYCN-specific inhibition by the antigene oligonucleotide BGA002 in combination with 13-cis RA (BGA002-RA) overcome resistance in MNA-NB cell lines, leading to potent MYCN mRNA expression and protein decrease. Moreover, BGA002-RA reactivated neuron differentiation or led to apoptosis in MNA-NB cell lines, and inhibited invasiveness capacity. Since NB and PI3K/mTOR pathway are strictly related MYCN down-regulation by BGA002 led to mTOR pathway inhibition in MNA-NB, that was strengthened by BGA002-RA. I further analyzed if MYCN silencing may induce autophagy reactivation, and indeed BGA002-RA caused a massive increase in lysosomes and macrovacuoles in MNA-NB cells. In addition, while MYCN is known to induce angiogenesis, BGA002-RA in vivo treatment elim- inated the tumor vascularization in a MNA-NB mice model, and significantly increased the survival. Overall, these results indicate that MYCN modulation mediates the therapeutic efficacy of RA and the development of RA resistance in MNA-NB. Furthermore, by targeting MYCN, we show a cancer-specific way of mTOR pathway inhibition only in MNA-NB, avoiding side effects of targeting mTOR in normal cells. These findings warrant clinical testing of BGA002-RA as a potential strategy to overcome RA resistance in MNA-NB.

The dark and bright side of remote work: social isolation, concentration, and performance of remote workers

This dissertation, comprised of three separate studies, focuses on the relationship between remote work adoption and employee job performance, analyzing employee social isolation and job concentration as the main mediators of this relationship. It also examines the impact of concern about COVID-19 and emotional stability as moderators of these relationships. Using a survey-based method in an emergency homeworking context, the first study found that social isolation had a negative effect on remote work productivity and satisfaction, and that COVID-19 concerns affected this relationship differently for individuals with high and low levels of concern. The second study, a diary study analyzing hybrid workers, found a positive correlation between work from home (WFH) adoption and job performance through social isolation and job concentration, with emotional stability serving respectively as a buffer and booster in the relationships between WFH and the mediators. The third study, even in this case a diary study of hybrid workers, confirmed the benefits of work from home on job performance and the importance of job concentration as a mediator, while suggesting that social isolation may not be significant when studying employee job performance, but it is relevant for employee well-being. Although each study provides autonomously a discussion and research and practical implications, this dissertation also presents a general discussion on remote work and its psychological implications, highlighting areas for future research