Ribosome Biogenesis and cell cycle regulation: Effect of RNA Polymerase III inhibition

In cycling cells positive stimuli like nutrient, growth factors and mitogens increase ribosome biogenesis rate and protein synthesis to ensure both growth and proliferation. In contrast, under stress situation, proliferating cells negatively modulate ribosome production to reduce protein synthesis and block cell cycle progression. The main strategy used by cycling cell to coordinate cell proliferation and ribosome biogenesis is to share regulatory elements, which participate directly in ribosome production and in cell cycle regulation. In fact, there is evidence that stimulation or inhibition of cell proliferation exerts direct effect on activity of the RNA polymerases controlling the ribosome biogenesis, while several alterations in normal ribosome biogenesis cause changes of the expression and the activity of the tumor suppressor p53, the main effector of cell cycle progression inhibition. The available data on the cross-talk between ribosome biogenesis and cell proliferation have been until now obtained in experimental model in which changes in ribosome biogenesis were obtained either by reducing the activity of the RNA polymerase I or by down-regulating the expression of the ribosomal proteins. The molecular pathways involved in the relationship between the effect of the inhibition of RNA polymerase III (Pol III) activity and cell cycle progression have been not yet investigated. In eukaryotes, RNA Polymerase III is responsible for transcription of factors involved both in ribosome assembly (5S rRNA) and rRNA processing (RNAse P and MRP).Thus, the aim of this study is characterize the effects of the down-regulation of RNA Polymerase III activity, or the specific depletion of 5S rRNA. The results that will be obtained might lead to a deeper understanding of the molecular pathway that controls the coordination between ribosome biogenesis and cell cycle, and might give useful information about the possibility to target RNA Polymerase III for cancer treatment.

A novel phase variation mechanism in the meningococcus driven by a ligand-responsive repressor and differential spacing of distal promoter elements

Phase variable expression, mediated by high frequency reversible changes in the length of simple sequence repeats, facilitates adaptation of bacterial populations to changing environments and is frequently important in bacterial virulence. Here we elucidate a novel phase variable mechanism for NadA expression, an adhesin and invasin of Neisseria meningitidis. The NadR repressor protein binds to operators flanking the phase variable tract of the nadA promoter gene and contributes to the differential expression levels of phase variant promoters with different numbers of repeats, likely due to different spacing between operators. It is shown that IHF binds between these operators, and may permit looping of the promoter, allowing interaction of NadR at operators located distally or overlapping the promoter. The 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, a metabolite of aromatic amino acid catabolism that is secreted in saliva, induces nadA expression by inhibiting the DNA binding activity of the NadR repressor. When induced, only minor differences are evident between NadR-independent transcription levels of promoter phase variants, which are likely due to differential RNA polymerase contacts leading to altered promoter activity. These results suggest that NadA expression is under both stochastic and tight environmental-sensing regulatory control, and both regulations are mediated by the NadR repressor that and may be induced during colonization of the oropharynx where it plays a major role in the successful adhesion and invasion of the mucosa. Hence, simple sequence repeats in promoter regions may be a strategy used by host-adapted bacterial pathogens to randomly switch between expression states that may nonetheless still be induced by appropriate niche-specific signals.