Validation of a new method for human nerve decellularization: toward a new tool in peripheral nerve reconstructive surgery.

Defects of the peripheral nervous system are extremely frequent in trauma and surgeries and have high socioeconomic costs. In case of peripheral nerve injury, the first approach is primary neurorrhaphy, which is direct nerve repair with epineural microsutures of the two stumps. However, this is not feasible in case of stump retraction or in case of tissue loss (gap > 2 cm), where the main surgical options are autologous grafts, allogenic grafts, or nerve conduits. While the gold standard is the autograft, it has disadvantages related to its harvesting, with an inevitable donor site morbidity and functional deficit. Fresh nerve allografts have therefore become a viable alternative option, but they require immunosuppression, which is often contraindicated. Acellular Nerve Allografts (ANA) represent a valid alternative, they do not need immunosuppression and appear to be safe and effective based on recent studies. The purpose of this study is to propose and develop an innovative method of nerve decellularization (Rizzoli method), conforming to cleanroom requirements in order to perform the direct tissue manipulation step and the nerve decellularization process within five hours, so as to accelerate the detachment of myelin and cellular debris, without detrimental effects on nerve architecture. In this study, the safety and the efficacy of the new method are evaluated in vitro and in vivo by histological, immunohistochemical, and histomorphometric studies in rabbits and humans. The new method is rapid, safe, and cheaper if compared with available commercial ANAs. The present study shows that the method, previously optimized in vitro and in vivo on animal model presented by our group, can be applied on human nerve samples. This work represents the first step in providing a novel, safe, and inexpensive tool for use by European tissue banks to democratize the use of nerve tissue transplantation for nerve injury reconstruction.

Differenziamento macrofagico: gli effetti dei polimeri sintetici

Research for new biocompatible and easily implantable materials continuously proposes new molecules and new substances with biological, chemical and physical characteristics, that are more and more adapted to aesthetic and reconstructive surgery and to the development of biomedical devices such as cardiovascular prostheses. Two classes of polymeric biomaterials seem to meet better these requirements: “hydrogels” , which includes polyalkylimide (PAI) and polyvinylalcohol (PVA) and “elastomers”, which includes polyurethanes (PUs). The first ones in the last decade have had a great application for soft tissue augmentation, due to their similarity to this tissue for their high water content, elasticity and oxygen permeability (Dini et al., 2005). The second ones, on the contrary, are widely used in cardiovascular applications (catheters, vascular grafts, ventricular assist devices, total artificial hearts) due to their good mechanical properties and hemocompatibility (Zdrahala R.J. and Zdrahala I.J., 1999). In the biocompatibility evaluation of these synthetic polymers, that is important for its potential use in clinical applications, a fundamental aspect is the knowledge of the polymers cytotoxicity and the effect of their interaction with cells, in particular with the cell populations involved in the inflammatory responses, i.e. monocyte/macrophages. In consideration of what above said, the aim of this study is the comprehension of the in vitro effect of PAI, PVA and PU on three cell lines that represent three different stages of macrophagic differentiation: U937 pro-monocytes, THP-1 monocytes and RAW 264.7 macrophages. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by measuring the rate of viability with MTT, Neutral Red and morphological analysis at light microscope in time-course dependent experiments. The influence of these polymers on monocyte/macrophage activation in terms of cells adhesion, monocyte differentiation in macrophages, antigens distribution, aspecific phagocytosis, fluid-phase endocitosis, pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and nitric oxide (NO) release was evaluated. In conclusion, our studies have indicated that the three different polymeric biomaterials are highly biocompatible, since they scarcely affected viability of U937, THP-1 and RAW 264.7 cells. Moreover, we have found that even though hydrogels and polyurethane influences monocyte/macrophage differentiation (depending on the particular type of cell and polymer), they are immunocompatible since they not induced significantly high cytokine release. For these reasons their clinical applications are strongly encouraged.

Reconstructive Microsurgery and Tissue Engineering in Musculo-Skeletal Oncology - Innovative Techniques

Tumors involving bone and soft tissues are extremely challenging situations. With the recent advances of multi-modal treatment, not only the type of surgery has moved from amputation to limb-sparing procedures, but also the survivorship has improved considerably and reconstructive techniques have the goal to allow a considerably higher quality of life. In bone reconstruction, tissue engineering strategies are the main area of research. Re-vascularization and re-vitalisation of a massive allograft would considerably improve the outcome of biological reconstructions. Using a rabbit animal model, in this study we showed that, by implanting a vascular pedicle inside a weight bearing massive cortical allograft, the bone regeneration inside the allograft was higher compared to the non-vascularized implants, given the patency of the vascular pedicle. Improvement in the animal model and the addition of Stem Cells and Growth factors will allow a further improvement in the results. In soft tissue tumors, free and pedicled flaps have been proven to be of great help as reconstruction strategies. In this study we analyzed the functional and overall outcome of 14 patients who received a re-innervated vascularized flap. We have demonstrated that the use of the innovative technique of motor re-innervated muscular flaps is effective when the resection involves important functional compartments of the upper or lower limb, with no increase of post-operative complications. Although there was no direct comparison between this type of reconstruction and the standard non-innervated reconstruction, we underlined the remarkable high overall functional scores and patient satisfaction following this procedure.