Immunohistochemical and Molecular Prognostic/Predictive Markers in Neoplastic Diseases

Traditional morphological examinations are not anymore sufficient for a complete evaluation of tumoral tissue and the use of neoplastic markers is of utmost importance. Neoplastic markers can be classified in: diagnostic, prognostic and predictive markers. Three markers were analyzed. 1) Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) was immunohistochemically examined in prostatic tissues: 40 radical prostatectomies from hormonally untreated patients with their preoperative biopsies, 10 radical prostatectomies from patients under complete androgen ablation before surgery and 10 simple prostatectomies from patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Results were compared with α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR). IGFBP2 was expressed in the cytoplasm of untreated adenocarcinomas and, to a lesser extent, in HG-PIN; the expression was markedly lower in patients after complete androgen ablation. AMACR was similarly expressed in both adenocarcinoma and HG-PIN, the level being similar in both lesions; the expression was slightly lower in patients after complete androgen ablation. IGFBP2 may be used a diagnostic marker of prostatic adenocarcinomas. 2) Heparan surface proteoglycan immunohistochemical expression was examined in 150 oral squamous cell carcinomas. Follow up information was available in 93 patients (range: 6-34 months, mean: 19±7). After surgery, chemotherapy was performed in 8 patients and radiotherapy in 61 patients. Multivariate and univariate overall survival analyses showed that high expression of syndecan-1 (SYN-1) was associated with a poor prognosis. In patients treated with radiotherapy, such association was higher. SYN-1 is a prognostic marker in oral squamous cell carcinomas; it may also represent a predictive factor for responsiveness to radiotherapy. 3) EGFR was studied in 33 pulmonary adenocarcinomas with traditional DNA sequencing methods and with two mutation-specific antibodies. Overall, the two antibodies had 61.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation-specific antibodies may represent a predictive marker to identify patients candidate to tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy.

Outcome analysis of predictors in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Guidelines report a wide range of options in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): definitive chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy or the emerging stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (+/- chemotherapy). On behalf of the AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group, we collected retrospective clinical data on 419 LAPC from 15 Italian centers. The study protocol (PAULA-1: Pooled Analysis in Unresectable Locally Advanced pancreatic cancer) was approved by institutional review board of S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital (201/2015/O/OssN). From this large database we performed tree different studies. The first was a retrospective study about 56 LAPC treated with SBRT at a median biologically equivalent dose of 48 Gy +/- chemotherapy. We demonstrated a statistically significant impact of biologically equivalent dose based on an α/β ratio of 10Gy ≥ 48Gy for local control (LC) (p: 0.045) and overall survival (p: 0.042) in LAPC. The second was a retrospective matched-cohort case-control study comparing SBRT (40 patients) and chemoradiation (40 patients) in LAPC in terms of different endpoints. Our findings suggested an equivalence in terms of most outcomes among the two treatments and an advantage of SBRT in terms of LC (p: 0.017). The third study was a retrospective comparison of definitive chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and SBRT (+/- chemotherapy) in terms of different outcomes in LAPC. A predictive model for LC in LAPC was also developed reaching an AUC of 68% (CI 58,7%-77,4%). SBRT treatment emerged as a positive predictive factor for improved LC. Findings deriving from our three studies suggest that SBRT is comparable to standard of care (definitive chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy) in terms of outcomes. SBRT seems to be an emerging therapeutic option in LAPC significantly improving local control. Furthermore, we have shown the potential of a predictive model for LC. Randomized trials are needed to compare these different therapeutic options in LAPC.

Trattamento transcatetere e chirurgico della stenosi valvolare aortica severa in Hesperia Hospital Modena nella seconda decade del ventunesimo secolo

Scopo Confrontare il trattamento transcatetere (TAVI) balloon-expandable con il trattamento chirurgico di sostituzione valvolare aortica (AVR) della stenosi valvolare aortica severa (SVAS) nella pratica clinica real world. Materiali e metodi Nel decennio 2010-2020, 1486 pazienti con SVAS isolata sono stati sottoposti a AVR (n=1049) o TAVI balloon-expandable (n=437) presso Hesperia Hospital Modena. Sono stati analizzati la Mortality nell’intera popolazione e gli episodi di ricovero cardiovascolare nei 5 anni precedenti e durante il follow-up nella popolazione residente in Emilia Romagna (n=1196) al momento della procedura (AVR n=879, TAVI balloon-expandable n=317). Risultati La popolazione TAVI è risultata mediamente più anziana di quella AVR (età media 82.2 vs. 72.7 anni) e maggiormente gravata da comorbidità. L’In-hospital mortality è stata del 1.4% nella AVR e 2.1% nella TAVI (pNS). La sopravvivenza a 5 anni è stata del 85.74% nella AVR e del 59.45% nella TAVI, con la TAVI come fattore predittivo di All-cause mortality (HR 1.44 95%CI 1.14-1.82). La riospedalizzazione per Heart Failure a 5 anni è stata del 20.6% per AVR e 51.3% per TAVI, con dialisi preoperatoria (HR 5.67 95%CI 3.06-10.49) come principale fattore predittivo. Il tasso di All Stroke a 5 anni è stato del 3.7% nella AVR e del 7.5% nella TAVI, con fibrillazione atriale preoperatoria come principale fattore predittivo (HR 1.91 95%CI 1.06-3.45). Il tasso di angioplastica coronarica percutanea (PCI) a 5 anni è stato del 3.1% sia nella AVR che nella TAVI, con previous PCI come principale fattore predittivo (HR 4.86 95%CI 2.57-9.21). L’impianto di pacemaker a 30 giorni è stato del 2.9% nella AVR e 3.4% nella TAVI (pNS). Conclusioni Nella pratica clinica real-world 2010-2020 di un centro cardiochirurgico a medio volume, la TAVI balloon-expandable ha mostrato una eccellente performance a 30 giorni in confronto con la AVR, che invece ha evidenziato una migliore performance durante follow-up.