I fondi comuni di investimento: Aspetti inerenti alla separazione patrimoniale

Il presente lavoro mira a una ricostruzione della condizione giuridica del fondo comune di investimento, definito come “patrimonio autonomo e distinto”, su cui il legislatore non ha preso alcuna posizione espressa sul piano della titolarità, lasciando all’interprete il relativo (e tormentato) compito. A tal fine, l’esame critico della disciplina, alla luce di ulteriori forme di separazione patrimoniale rinvenibili nell’ordinamento giuridico, richiede un approccio metodologico teso sì a una ricostruzione in retrospettiva della questione ma anche a una sua analisi sistematica. La prima parte prende avvio dall’analisi della disciplina dei fondi comuni di investimento e della gestione collettiva del risparmio, ripercorrendo i tratti salienti della normativa al fine di acclararne la ratio. Rifuggendo da una redazione meramente compilativa, tale analisi risulta necessaria ai fini dell’esame degli aspetti problematici concernenti la natura giuridica dei fondi comuni di investimento, che non può essere avulso dal relativo contesto normativo. La seconda parte è dedicata al tema della qualificazione giuridica del fondo e della relativa titolarità alla luce della risalente dottrina, dell’evoluzione normativa e della giurisprudenza pronunciatasi sul punto. Sotto questo profilo, la prospettiva di indagine mira ad approfondire alcuni degli spunti emergenti dalle riflessioni teoriche concernenti la natura e la titolarità del fondo, avendo riguardo non solo alla classiche categorie civilistiche ma anche alla reale essenza della struttura e della disciplina dei fondi comuni di investimento e alle specifiche finalità di tutela degli interessi degli investitori perseguite dalla disciplina. Seguendo questo percorso, l’ultima parte volge uno sguardo doveroso alle tematiche concernenti le funzioni della separazione dei patrimoni nell'ambito dei mercati finanziari e del diritto positivo, senza pretermettere le categorie civilistiche, di diritto interno e di diritto straniero, sottese alle fattispecie considerate.

Ricerche sulle Res cottidianae

Le Res cottidianae sive Aurea sono un’opera giuridica elementare di diritto privato romano. A differenza delle Institutiones di Gaio, di cui abbiamo conoscenza in larga misura grazie al palinsesto Codice Veronese, tutto ciò che sappiamo delle res cottidianae si arresta a ventisei frammenti che ci sono tramandati dal Digesto. Dibattuta è la loro paternità, dibattuta la genuinità del loro contenuto, dibattuti sono il titolo che recavano e di quanti libri fossero composte. La presente ricerca tenta di rispondere a queste vexatae quaestiones e offrire nuove prospettive alla risoluzione del c.d. «enigma gaiano». Punto di partenza sarà una indagine preliminare sul rapporto intercorrente tra le res cottidianae e le Institutiones di Gaio, volta a mostrare la struttura parallela delle due opere, le analogie testuali, i punti di contatto e divergenza. Ci si addentrerà, in seguito, nei ventisei frammenti delle res cottidianae, posto che qualsiasi riflessione scientifica sull’opera non può essere svincolata dall’analisi testuale. Si offrirà infine un bilancio complessivo delle res cottidianae, anche in relazione all’effettiva portata del lascito gaiano agli studi giuridici di diritto positivo.

Quantifying the Economics of Medical Malpractice - A View from a Civil Law Perspective

Life is full of uncertainties. Legal rules should have a clear intention, motivation and purpose in order to diminish daily uncertainties. However, practice shows that their consequences are complex and hard to predict. For instance, tort law has the general objectives of deterring future negligent behavior and compensating the victims of someone else's negligence. Achieving these goals are particularly difficult in medical malpractice cases. To start with, when patients search for medical care they are typically sick in the first place. In case harm materializes during the treatment, it might be very hard to assess if it was due to substandard medical care or to the patient's poor health conditions. Moreover, the practice of medicine has a positive externality on the society, meaning that the design of legal rules is crucial: for instance, it should not result in physicians avoiding practicing their activity just because they are afraid of being sued even when they acted according to the standard level of care. The empirical literature on medical malpractice has been developing substantially in the past two decades, with the American case being the most studied one. Evidence from civil law tradition countries is more difficult to find. The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the empirical literature on medical malpractice, using two civil law countries as a case-study: Spain and Italy. The goal of this thesis is to investigate, in the first place, some of the consequences of having two separate sub-systems (administrative and civil) coexisting within the same legal system, which is common in civil law tradition countries with a public national health system (such as Spain, France and Portugal). When this holds, different procedures might apply depending on the type of hospital where the injury took place (essentially whether it is a public hospital or a private hospital). Therefore, a patient injured in a public hospital should file a claim in administrative courts while a patient suffering an identical medical accident should file a claim in civil courts. A natural question that the reader might pose is why should both administrative and civil courts decide medical malpractice cases? Moreover, can this specialization of courts influence how judges decide medical malpractice cases? In the past few years, there was a general concern with patient safety, which is currently on the agenda of several national governments. Some initiatives have been taken at the international level, with the aim of preventing harm to patients during treatment and care. A negligently injured patient might present a claim against the health care provider with the aim of being compensated for the economic loss and for pain and suffering. In several European countries, health care is mainly provided by a public national health system, which means that if a patient harmed in a public hospital succeeds in a claim against the hospital, public expenditures increase because the State takes part in the litigation process. This poses a problem in a context of increasing national health expenditures and public debt. In Italy, with the aim of increasing patient safety, some regions implemented a monitoring system on medical malpractice claims. However, if properly implemented, this reform shall also allow for a reduction in medical malpractice insurance costs. This thesis is organized as follows. Chapter 1 provides a review of the empirical literature on medical malpractice, where studies on outcomes and merit of claims, costs and defensive medicine are presented. Chapter 2 presents an empirical analysis of medical malpractice claims arriving to the Spanish Supreme Court. The focus is on reversal rates for civil and administrative decisions. Administrative decisions appealed by the plaintiff have the highest reversal rates. The results show a bias in lower administrative courts, which tend to focus on the State side. We provide a detailed explanation for these results, which can rely on the organization of administrative judges career. Chapter 3 assesses predictors of compensation in medical malpractice cases appealed to the Spanish Supreme Court and investigates the amount of damages attributed to patients. The results show horizontal equity between administrative and civil decisions (controlling for observable case characteristics) and vertical inequity (patients suffering more severe injuries tend to receive higher payouts). In order to execute these analyses, a database of medical malpractice decisions appealed to the Administrative and Civil Chambers of the Spanish Supreme Court from 2006 until 2009 (designated by the Spanish Supreme Court Medical Malpractice Dataset (SSCMMD)) has been created. A description of how the SSCMMD was built and of the Spanish legal system is presented as well. Chapter 4 includes an empirical investigation of the effect of a monitoring system for medical malpractice claims on insurance premiums. In Italy, some regions adopted this policy in different years, while others did not. The study uses data on insurance premiums from Italian public hospitals for the years 2001-2008. This is a significant difference as most of the studies use the insurance company as unit of analysis. Although insurance premiums have risen from 2001 to 2008, the increase was lower for regions adopting a monitoring system for medical claims. Possible implications of this system are also provided. Finally, Chapter 5 discusses the main findings, describes possible future research and concludes.

Bank Governance and the Bail-in in the EU. A Law & Finance analysis on the role of bail-inable creditors

This dissertation assesses the impact of the EU Directive on Bank Recovery and Resolution (BRRD) on bank corporate governance and investigates a fundamental question. Can the resolution framework for distressed banks enhance the quality of banks’ decision making? According to the Directive, the Resolution Authority can impose losses on bank’s creditors in case of distress through a bail-in. Bail-inable creditors become residual claimants of the bank, contingent on its distress. The first part of the dissertation establishes an analytical framework for bank governance, starting from the problem of what can be defined as “good governance” in banking. The dissertation hypothesizes that governance regulation represents a necessary link between the incentives of corporate constituencies and the goals of substantive regulation. The second part builds upon this analytical framework and carries out a positive analysis encompassing three channels of debt governance; namely, price internalisation of risk; contractual arrangements and the discrete impact of different type of creditors. The existence of a resolution framework should incentivise bail-inable creditors to better discipline the borrowing bank; yet, the design of both the capital and resolution regulation largely foreclose such possibility to creditors. Against this backdrop, the third part of the dissertation moves to normative considerations. The approach to this normative part combines and complements the study of cash flow rights of the management with the study of the voting rights to bail-inable creditors. On the cash flow side, the dissertation proposes to include bail-inable debt as part of the variable remuneration for bank risk-takers. On the voting right, the proposal is to grant a limited basket of ex-ante governance rights to bail-inable creditors. Such a unified approach is rather uncommon in the literature, where cash flow rights and voting rights are often approached separately whereas those complement each other in the dissertation.

Transitional Justice as a Post-Revolution Constitutional Arrangement: A Law and Economics Approach

This dissertation addresses the timely questions of transitional justice (TJ) in the aftermath of revolutions against autocratic regimes, dealing with TJ as a constitutional arrangement through the lenses of constitutional economics. After an introductory chapter, chapter 2 deals with why nations rarely adopt meaningful TJ processes in the first place, it then explains the limitations of civil society as the arbiter, facilitator, and enforcer of TJ policies. Chapter 3 tackles the question of which mechanisms to choose? It uses the UN Guidelines on TJ that sets five principal TJ mechanisms. It provides a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of each mechanism and suggests policy implications accordingly. The CBA inspires chapter 4 analysis, suggesting a tradeoff between restrictive fair trial standards under constitutional laws and justice considerations. The tradeoff explains the suggested efficiency of the balanced TJ approaches that combine trials and amnesties. This approach is used for the case study analysis of TJ in Tunisia after the 2011 revolution in chapter 5. The chapter presents the first index of TJ mechanisms in Tunisia through novel data collected by the author. It shows an ultimate TJ design that ended with a modest harvest in the application. The lack of cooperation between the Tunisian parties, added to the absence of transparency in many TJ measures, threatens any possible positive outcomes of the partial TJ process. It is also alarming regarding constitutional compliance in a system that – until recently - was considered the only democracy in the Arab region. Chapter 6 is a summary